Echinocandins Are the Preferred Antifungal for Empirical Therapy in Sepsis
For empirical antifungal therapy in sepsis, echinocandins (anidulafungin, micafungin, or caspofungin) are the preferred first-line agents, especially in hemodynamically unstable patients with septic shock or those with recent azole exposure. 1, 2
Risk Assessment for Fungal Infection in Sepsis
- Empiric antifungal therapy should be considered in critically ill septic patients with risk factors for invasive candidiasis when no other cause of fever is identified 2
- Key risk factors for invasive Candida infections include:
- Immunocompromised status (neutropenia, chemotherapy, transplant, diabetes mellitus) 1
- Prolonged invasive vascular devices (hemodialysis catheters, central venous catheters) 1
- Total parenteral nutrition 1, 2
- Necrotizing pancreatitis 1
- Recent major surgery (particularly abdominal) 1
- Prolonged administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics 1
- Prolonged hospital/ICU admission 1
- Recent fungal infection 1
- Multisite Candida colonization 1, 3
First-Line Antifungal Selection
Echinocandins are the preferred empiric therapy for suspected invasive candidiasis in sepsis, particularly in:
Recommended echinocandin dosing regimens:
Alternative Antifungal Options
Fluconazole (800 mg loading dose, then 400 mg daily) is an acceptable alternative in:
Liposomal formulations of amphotericin B (3-5 mg/kg daily) are reasonable alternatives in patients with echinocandin intolerance or toxicity 1, 4
Timing and Duration of Therapy
- Antifungal therapy should be initiated as soon as possible in patients with suspected fungal sepsis, ideally within 1 hour of recognition 1
- Delayed antifungal therapy is associated with increased mortality in patients with septic shock due to Candida 2, 5
- Empiric antifungal therapy should typically be continued for 14 days in patients who improve clinically 2
- De-escalation to a more targeted antifungal should occur once the pathogen and susceptibilities are identified 1
Special Considerations
- Central venous catheter removal is strongly recommended in non-neutropenic patients with candidemia 2
- For neutropenic patients, catheter removal should be considered on an individual basis 2
- Dilated funduscopic examinations should be performed to rule out endophthalmitis in patients with candidemia 2
- For persistent candidemia, consider imaging of the genitourinary tract, liver, and spleen 2
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Delaying antifungal therapy in high-risk patients with septic shock can significantly increase mortality 2, 6
- Empiric therapy based solely on colonization with Candida species without other risk factors is inadequate 2
- Premature discontinuation of antifungal therapy before complete resolution can lead to relapse, especially in immunocompromised patients 4
- Failure to consider local resistance patterns when selecting empiric therapy 1
Evidence on Outcomes
- Early appropriate antifungal therapy significantly reduces time to appropriate treatment in Candida-related septic shock (10.6 hours vs 40.5 hours with standard therapy) 7
- Patients receiving empiric therapy are more likely to receive appropriate therapy within 12 hours of shock onset (69.2% vs 6.7%) 7
- The EMPIRICUS trial showed that empirical micafungin decreased the rate of new invasive fungal infections compared to placebo (3% vs 12%) in critically ill patients with Candida colonization and sepsis 3