What is the standard method for CT grading in chronic rhinosinusitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Standard CT Grading Method for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The Lund-Mackay scoring system is the standard method for CT grading in chronic rhinosinusitis, based on the degree of opacification for the paranasal sinuses and ostiomeatal complex. 1

Lund-Mackay Scoring System Details

  • The Lund-Mackay system scores each sinus based on the degree of opacification: 0 (none), 1 (partial), or 2 (complete) 1
  • The following sinuses are evaluated bilaterally: maxillary, anterior ethmoids, posterior ethmoids, frontal, and sphenoid 1
  • The ostiomeatal complex is scored as either 0 (not obstructed) or 2 (obstructed) 1
  • The maximum total score is 24 points (12 points per side) 1
  • This scoring system has been validated in multiple studies and is widely accepted as the standard method 1

Clinical Relevance of Lund-Mackay Scores

  • A Lund-Mackay score of 2 or less has excellent negative predictive value 1
  • A score of 5 or more has excellent positive predictive value, strongly indicating true disease 1
  • In pediatric rhinosinusitis, a Lund-Mackay score of at least 5 provides 86% sensitivity and 85% specificity 1
  • Using a cut-off value greater than 2 for CRS diagnosis yields 94% sensitivity and 41% specificity 1
  • When using "normal" LMS scores (>4) as the threshold, specificity increases to 59% 1

Alternative Scoring Systems

  • Alternative CT scoring systems have been proposed but have not shown significant improvement in correlation with symptom severity scores or health-related quality of life impairment 1
  • Another scoring system described in clinical trials grades based on the degree of obstruction and amount of mucosal thickening:
    • Nasal passages and ostiomeatal complex: scored 0-3 points based on soft tissue obstruction 1
    • Paranasal sinuses: scored 0-3 points based on mucosal thickening measured in millimeters 1

Clinical Application Guidelines

  • CT imaging is not normally recommended until after an appropriate course of medical therapy has failed 1
  • The EPOS2020 steering group considers a total Lund-Mackay score of 0 as clinically irrelevant 1
  • Scores of 2 due to complete obstruction of one sinus, or scores of 3 or greater (whether unilateral or bilateral) are considered clinically relevant 1
  • The presence of complete opacification of any sinus is considered clinically positive 1
  • For both medical and surgical treatment planning, a CT scan performed within the previous six months is considered acceptable 1

Correlation with Symptoms and Disease

  • The only symptom that significantly correlates with CT scores is olfaction 1
  • There is generally weak correlation between CT stage and patient-reported symptoms in CRS overall 1
  • CT scores correlate significantly with the stage of inflammation in histopathological analysis of sinus mucosal samples, most notably in CRS without nasal polyps 1
  • Recent studies show that preoperative Lund-Mackay scores in patients with medically recalcitrant CRS correlate with preoperative symptom severity and can indicate postsurgical quality of life outcomes 1

Important Considerations

  • Low-dose CT protocols have significantly reduced radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy 1
  • The pattern of inflammation may have diagnostic value - a central radiological pattern of mucosal disease (the "black halo" sign) is associated with inhalant allergen sensitization 1
  • Other radiologic features such as neo-osteogenesis may have prognostic implications and can be scored separately 1
  • When evaluating CT scans, the degree of mucosal thickening, number of sinuses affected, and status of the ostiomeatal complex should all be considered, though their individual importance remains unclear 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.