What is the significance of the Sofa-2 (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment-2) score in defining sepsis and guiding treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

SOFA-2 Score in Defining Sepsis

The SOFA-2 score is a critical tool for defining sepsis as it measures life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with an increase of 2 or more points representing organ dysfunction that defines sepsis according to the Sepsis-3 criteria. 1, 2

Components and Scoring of SOFA

  • The SOFA score evaluates dysfunction across six organ systems, with each system scored from 0-4 points (total possible range 0-24) 3:

    • Respiratory system: PaO2/FiO2 ratio
    • Cardiovascular system: Mean arterial pressure and vasopressor requirements
    • Neurological system: Glasgow Coma Scale
    • Renal system: Creatinine levels and urine output
    • Hepatic system: Bilirubin levels
    • Coagulation system: Platelet count
  • The SOFA-2 score has updated thresholds that better describe organ dysfunction distribution and associated mortality (AUROC 0.79) compared to the original SOFA score (AUROC 0.77) 4

Clinical Significance in Defining Sepsis

  • According to the Sepsis-3 definition, sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, with organ dysfunction represented by an increase in SOFA score of 2 points or more 1

  • The SOFA score was originally developed to sequentially assess the degree of multi-organ failure in critically ill patients with sepsis and has been widely validated across healthcare settings 3, 5

  • The European Medicines Agency has accepted that a change in SOFA score is an acceptable surrogate marker of efficacy in exploratory trials of novel therapeutic agents in sepsis 5

Quick SOFA (qSOFA) and Screening

  • The qSOFA score includes three clinical variables: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or less, systolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or less, and respiratory rate 22/min or greater 1

  • Patients with at least 2 of these 3 qSOFA criteria may be prone to poor outcomes typical of sepsis and should be further evaluated using the complete SOFA score 1

  • While qSOFA serves as a bedside screening tool, the full SOFA score provides a more comprehensive assessment of organ dysfunction 1, 6

Prognostic Value

  • The SOFA score has high discriminative ability in predicting mortality in sepsis patients, with an area under the ROC curve of approximately 0.75 3, 7

  • When the SOFA score is >11, its sensitivity and negative predictive values for sepsis diagnosis are both 100% 7

  • For predicting in-hospital mortality, a SOFA score >9 has a sensitivity of 65.8% and specificity of 75.5% 7

  • An increase in SOFA score (ΔSOFA) of ≥2 points from day 1 to day 3 is associated with significantly higher mortality rates 8

Clinical Application

  • Regular, repeated scoring of SOFA enables monitoring of disease progression throughout a patient's ICU stay 3, 2

  • The SOFA score should be calculated on admission and then sequentially to monitor progression of organ dysfunction and response to treatment 2

  • For patients with suspected sepsis, SOFA scores guide management decisions and resource allocation 2

Limitations and Considerations

  • The SOFA score does not incorporate gastrointestinal or immune dysfunction due to insufficient data and lack of content validity 2, 4

  • Unlike other scoring systems such as APACHE II, SOFA does not consider the patient's age or comorbidities 3, 9

  • SOFA is not suitable for categorizing patients with low-moderate severity without sepsis or organ failure in the first 24 hours of hospital admission 3

  • Standardization between different assessors in widespread centers is key to detecting response to treatment when using SOFA as an outcome in sepsis clinical trials 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Organ Dysfunction Assessment in Critical Illness

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Sepsis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Critically Ill Patients with Organ Dysfunction

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.