Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Myeloma
Multiple myeloma is diagnosed when there are ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE) including CRAB criteria or other specific biomarkers. 1, 2
Core Diagnostic Requirements
Clonal plasma cell evidence: Either ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells OR a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma 2, 1
PLUS at least one of the following multiple myeloma defining events (MDE):
CRAB criteria (evidence of end-organ damage):
OR any of these biomarkers of malignancy (even without CRAB features):
Diagnostic Workup
Initial Laboratory Testing
- Serum and urine protein electrophoresis with immunofixation 2
- 24-hour urine collection for protein electrophoresis (not random sample) 2
- Nephelometric quantification of IgG, IgA, and IgM immunoglobulins 2
- Serum free light chain (FLC) assay with kappa/lambda ratio 2
- Complete blood count (CBC) 4
- Serum calcium and creatinine 4
- β2-microglobulin 4
Bone Marrow Examination
- Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy 2
- CD138 staining to accurately determine plasma cell percentage 2
- Cytogenetic/FISH studies for risk stratification 2
Imaging
- Skeletal survey 4
- MRI of thoracic-lumbar spine and pelvis (especially if conventional imaging is negative) 4, 1
Distinguishing Multiple Myeloma from Related Conditions
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
- Serum monoclonal protein <3 g/dL 2
- Clonal bone marrow plasma cells <10% 2
- Absence of end-organ damage (CRAB criteria) 2
- No immediate treatment required, but lifelong follow-up recommended 2
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)
- Intermediate stage between MGUS and MM 2
- Higher risk of progression (10% per year for first 5 years) 2
- Requires closer monitoring than MGUS 2
- No immediate treatment currently recommended 2
Risk Stratification
- High-risk multiple myeloma features include:
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Failing to distinguish between smoldering multiple myeloma and symptomatic multiple myeloma, which require different management approaches 5
- Performing unnecessary bone marrow biopsies and imaging in low-risk MGUS patients 2
- Delaying treatment in patients with clear CRAB criteria, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality 5
- Not recognizing the evolving versus non-evolving patterns of disease, which have different progression timelines (evolving: ~1.5 years; non-evolving: ~4 years) 4
Follow-up Recommendations
- For confirmed SMM patients: follow-up at 3-month intervals for the first year to establish the pattern of evolution 4
- For high-risk SMM patients (M-protein >3 g/dL and >10% BMPC, >95% phenotypically abnormal BMPC, immunoparesis, or evolving type): closer monitoring 4
- For lower-risk patients: less frequent follow-up may be sufficient 4