What are the diagnostic criteria for multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Criteria for Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma is diagnosed when there are ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE) including CRAB criteria or other specific biomarkers. 1, 2

Core Diagnostic Requirements

  • Clonal plasma cell evidence: Either ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells OR a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma 2, 1

  • PLUS at least one of the following multiple myeloma defining events (MDE):

    • CRAB criteria (evidence of end-organ damage):

      • C: Hypercalcemia (serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) 2
      • R: Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL or creatinine clearance <40 mL/min) 2
      • A: Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL or 2 g/dL below lower limit of normal) 2
      • B: Bone lesions (lytic lesions, severe osteopenia, or pathologic fractures) 2
    • OR any of these biomarkers of malignancy (even without CRAB features):

      • Bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60% 3, 1
      • Serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L) 1
      • 1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1

Diagnostic Workup

Initial Laboratory Testing

  • Serum and urine protein electrophoresis with immunofixation 2
  • 24-hour urine collection for protein electrophoresis (not random sample) 2
  • Nephelometric quantification of IgG, IgA, and IgM immunoglobulins 2
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay with kappa/lambda ratio 2
  • Complete blood count (CBC) 4
  • Serum calcium and creatinine 4
  • β2-microglobulin 4

Bone Marrow Examination

  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy 2
  • CD138 staining to accurately determine plasma cell percentage 2
  • Cytogenetic/FISH studies for risk stratification 2

Imaging

  • Skeletal survey 4
  • MRI of thoracic-lumbar spine and pelvis (especially if conventional imaging is negative) 4, 1

Distinguishing Multiple Myeloma from Related Conditions

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)

  • Serum monoclonal protein <3 g/dL 2
  • Clonal bone marrow plasma cells <10% 2
  • Absence of end-organ damage (CRAB criteria) 2
  • No immediate treatment required, but lifelong follow-up recommended 2

Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM)

  • Intermediate stage between MGUS and MM 2
  • Higher risk of progression (10% per year for first 5 years) 2
  • Requires closer monitoring than MGUS 2
  • No immediate treatment currently recommended 2

Risk Stratification

  • High-risk multiple myeloma features include:
    • del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, del 1p, or p53 mutation 1
    • Double-hit myeloma: presence of any two high-risk factors 1
    • Triple-hit myeloma: presence of three or more high-risk factors 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to distinguish between smoldering multiple myeloma and symptomatic multiple myeloma, which require different management approaches 5
  • Performing unnecessary bone marrow biopsies and imaging in low-risk MGUS patients 2
  • Delaying treatment in patients with clear CRAB criteria, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality 5
  • Not recognizing the evolving versus non-evolving patterns of disease, which have different progression timelines (evolving: ~1.5 years; non-evolving: ~4 years) 4

Follow-up Recommendations

  • For confirmed SMM patients: follow-up at 3-month intervals for the first year to establish the pattern of evolution 4
  • For high-risk SMM patients (M-protein >3 g/dL and >10% BMPC, >95% phenotypically abnormal BMPC, immunoparesis, or evolving type): closer monitoring 4
  • For lower-risk patients: less frequent follow-up may be sufficient 4

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Workup and Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma vs MGUS

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Multiple Myeloma Patients Meeting CRAB Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.