Differentiating SIADH and Cerebral Salt Wasting
The key difference between SIADH and CSW is volume status: SIADH patients are euvolemic while CSW patients are hypovolemic, requiring fundamentally different treatment approaches. 1, 2, 3
Diagnostic Criteria
Clinical Features
- SIADH: Euvolemic hyponatremia with normal skin turgor, no orthostatic hypotension, and no edema 2, 3
- CSW: Hypovolemic hyponatremia with signs of dehydration, orthostatic hypotension, dry mucous membranes, and unquenchable thirst 2, 4
Laboratory Findings
| Parameter | SIADH | CSW |
|---|---|---|
| Serum sodium | <135 mmol/L | <135 mmol/L |
| Serum osmolality | <275 mosm/kg | <275 mosm/kg |
| Urine sodium | >20 mmol/L | >20 mmol/L |
| Urine osmolality | >500 mosm/kg (inappropriately high) | >500 mosm/kg |
| Volume status | Euvolemic | Hypovolemic |
| Central venous pressure | 6-10 cm H₂O | <6 cm H₂O |
| NT-proBNP | <125 pg/ml | >125 pg/ml |
| Serum uric acid | <4 mg/dL (improves after correction) | <4 mg/dL (persists after correction) |
Pathophysiology
- SIADH: Excessive ADH secretion causing inappropriate water retention and dilutional hyponatremia 3
- CSW: Excessive natriuresis due to natriuretic peptide release, leading to volume depletion and secondary hyponatremia 4, 7
Treatment Algorithm
For SIADH:
- Fluid restriction to 1 L/day as cornerstone of treatment for mild/asymptomatic cases 1, 3
- For severe symptoms (seizures, coma):
- For resistant cases:
For CSW:
- Volume and sodium replacement as primary treatment 1, 4
- Normal saline or hypertonic saline based on severity 1, 4
- For severe cases:
- Avoid fluid restriction as it can worsen outcomes 1, 3
Critical Monitoring Parameters
- Maximum correction rate: 8 mmol/L in 24 hours (4-6 mmol/L for high-risk patients) 1, 3
- Monitor for signs of osmotic demyelination syndrome (dysarthria, dysphagia, quadriparesis) 1
- For severe symptoms: check sodium levels every 2 hours initially 1
Special Considerations
- In neurosurgical patients, CSW is more common than SIADH 1, 5
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage patients at risk for vasospasm should not receive fluid restriction 1, 3
- NT-proBNP >125 pg/ml has high sensitivity (87.5%) and specificity (93.3%) for diagnosing CSW 5
- Persistent hypouricemia after hyponatremia correction suggests CSW rather than SIADH 6, 9
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Misdiagnosing volume status leading to inappropriate treatment 1, 9
- Using fluid restriction in CSW (worsens outcomes) 1, 3
- Overly rapid correction causing osmotic demyelination syndrome 1, 3
- Inadequate monitoring during active correction 1
- Failing to recognize and treat the underlying cause 1, 3
By carefully assessing volume status and using appropriate laboratory tests, clinicians can differentiate between these two conditions and implement the correct treatment strategy to improve patient outcomes.