What is the recommended management for a 65-year-old female with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and cellular changes associated with atrophy on a Pap test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of ASC-US with Atrophic Changes in a 65-Year-Old Female

For a 65-year-old female with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and cellular changes associated with atrophy, the recommended management is HPV testing, with colposcopy if HPV-positive or repeat cytology in 12 months if HPV-negative. 1, 2

Initial Management Algorithm

  • For women with ASC-US, reflex HPV DNA testing is the preferred initial management strategy 3
  • If HPV testing is positive, colposcopy is recommended due to increased risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, 1
  • If HPV testing is negative, repeat cytology in 12 months is recommended 2, 4
  • Women over 65 years with ASC-US should not exit screening without additional negative tests, even with HPV-negative results 1

Rationale for Management

  • The risk of CIN3+ after an HPV-negative/ASC-US result is higher than after a completely negative co-test (0.48% vs 0.11%) 4
  • Studies show that approximately 9.7% of women with ASC-US have CIN 2 or more serious abnormality, necessitating further evaluation 3
  • Atrophic changes can mimic dysplasia, but should not alter the management algorithm for ASC-US 1
  • The 5-year cancer risk after HPV-negative/ASC-US (0.043%) is closer to that after a negative Pap test alone (0.031%) than after a negative co-test (0.014%), supporting a 3-year rather than 5-year follow-up interval 4

Follow-up Recommendations

  • If HPV testing is positive, follow-up after colposcopy depends on colposcopy results 3
  • If HPV testing is negative, repeat co-testing (Pap and HPV) in 3 years is recommended 1, 2, 4
  • Women should not exit screening at age 65 with a recent ASC-US result, even if HPV-negative 1
  • Continued screening is necessary until the patient has 2 consecutive negative co-tests or 3 consecutive negative Pap tests 1

Special Considerations for Older Women with Atrophic Changes

  • Atrophic changes in postmenopausal women can lead to ASC-US interpretations due to cellular changes that mimic dysplasia 5
  • Despite atrophic changes, the management algorithm remains the same as for other ASC-US results 1
  • Women over 60 years with HPV-positive ASC-US may have a higher risk for cervical cancer during follow-up than younger women 1
  • Risk estimates for cancer among women with HPV-positive ASC-US test results in this age group suggest caution is warranted 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not allow exit from screening at age 65 with a recent ASC-US result, as this is insufficient for exiting screening 1
  • Do not extend screening interval beyond 3 years for HPV-negative ASC-US, as the previous 5-year interval recommendation has been revised based on newer evidence 1, 4
  • Do not assume that an HPV-negative ASC-US result carries the same ultralow risk as a negative co-test 2
  • Do not perform colposcopy immediately for all ASC-US results regardless of HPV status, as it can lead to unnecessary procedures 2

Considerations for HIV-Infected Women

  • For HIV-infected women, more frequent screening is recommended regardless of age 3
  • Women with atypical squamous cells should undergo colposcopy and directed biopsy 3
  • Abnormal cervical cytology is 10–11 times more common in HIV-infected women compared with the general female population 3

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.