What percentage of men with prostate cancer achieve more than a 60% reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels after 6 infusions of Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Percentage of Men Achieving >60% PSA Reduction After 6 Infusions of Lu-177 PSMA Therapy

Approximately 31-35% of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer achieve more than a 60% reduction in PSA levels after 6 infusions of Lutetium-177 PSMA therapy. 1

Evidence on PSA Response to Lu-177 PSMA Therapy

  • In a study analyzing the prognostic importance of PSA response in patients receiving Lu-177 PSMA treatment, 33% of patients showed a PSA decline of ≥50% after the first cycle, which increased to 43% after completing all treatment cycles 1
  • The LuPSMA trial, a single-center phase 2 study, reported that 57% of patients (95% CI 37-75%) achieved a PSA decline of 50% or more after Lu-177 PSMA therapy 2
  • A real-world data analysis of 191 patients showed that a ≥50% PSA decline was observed in 56% of patients, while any PSA decline occurred in 75% of men receiving Lu-177 PSMA therapy 3
  • A prospective phase 2 pilot trial reported that 36% of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in PSA, and 64% achieved a ≥30% reduction in PSA levels 4

Factors Affecting PSA Response to Lu-177 PSMA Therapy

  • Higher baseline PSMA PET standardized uptake value (SUV) is predictive of better PSA response to Lu-177 PSMA therapy (SUV max value 44 ± 15 vs. 17 ± 9 for responders vs. non-responders, P < .007) 4
  • Predominantly lymph node metastatic disease and chemotherapy-naïve status are significant pre-therapy factors associated with better response and longer survival 3
  • Lower baseline PSA levels are significantly linked to better survival outcomes and predict a lower risk of disease progression 3
  • Older age and higher hemoglobin levels have been significantly associated with better PSA decline (>20%) in multivariable analysis 5

Clinical Significance of PSA Response

  • Achievement of any PSA decline at first measurement after Lu-177 PSMA therapy is significantly associated with improved survival 5
  • Patients with ≥50% decline in PSA level after the first cycle demonstrated significantly higher median overall survival (21.0 months) compared to non-responders (8.0 months) (P=0.012) 1
  • About 20% of patients who do not respond after the first cycle may become responders after completing all treatment cycles 1
  • There is a negative association between the number of previous chemotherapy lines and PSA decline above 20% 5

Monitoring PSA Response

  • PSA response is typically evaluated six weeks after each cycle of Lu-177 PSMA therapy, according to Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) criteria 1
  • Radiological imaging and Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT are typically performed before the first cycle and eight weeks after the last cycle to assess treatment response beyond PSA measurements 1
  • PSA velocity (rate of change) can provide useful information and increase the specificity of PSA testing for monitoring treatment response 6

Limitations and Considerations

  • PSA is not a cancer-specific marker, and various factors can affect PSA levels, including infection, recent instrumentation, ejaculation, or trauma 6
  • Different commercial PSA assays are not directly comparable or interchangeable since values are calibrated against different standards 6
  • When interpreting PSA changes, it's important to consider that patients may have a long survival even if hormonal treatment is delayed until evidence of metastases 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.