Liquid Paraffin for Constipation: Not Recommended Due to Safety Concerns
Liquid paraffin is not recommended for constipation management due to minimal efficacy and significant safety concerns including aspiration risk and perianal burning. 1, 2
Safety Concerns with Liquid Paraffin
- Liquid paraffin (mineral oil) is contraindicated if there is any risk of aspiration, which can lead to lipoid pneumonia 3
- Specifically avoid liquid paraffin for bed-bound patients and those with swallowing disorders due to the risk of aspiration pneumonia 1, 2
- Other safety concerns include perianal burning and potential interference with absorption of fat-soluble vitamins, though the clinical significance of vitamin malabsorption appears minimal 1, 3
Efficacy Considerations
- While some research shows liquid paraffin may increase stool frequency compared to lactulose (MD 4.94 stools per week), safety concerns outweigh potential benefits 4, 5
- A comparative study in children showed liquid paraffin had better improvement in stool consistency and frequency compared to lactulose, but safety concerns remain paramount 6
- The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy notes liquid paraffin has "minimal efficacy" as a faecal softener 1, 2
Recommended Alternatives
- Polyethylene glycol (PEG) is the preferred first-line treatment for constipation, with excellent safety profile and proven efficacy 1, 2, 5
- PEG 17g/day offers an efficacious and tolerable solution particularly for elderly patients 1
- Other recommended options include:
Special Populations
- For elderly patients with constipation, PEG is specifically recommended over liquid paraffin due to safety concerns 1
- For opioid-induced constipation, peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) like methylnaltrexone may be valuable in unresolved cases 1, 2
- For fecal impaction, digital fragmentation and extraction followed by maintenance bowel regimen is recommended rather than liquid paraffin 1, 2