CT Barium Swallow After Perforated Gastric Ulcer Repair
The primary indication for CT with oral contrast (or contrast swallow study) days after surgical repair of a perforated gastric ulcer is to detect anastomotic leak or repair site breakdown when clinical signs suggest postoperative complications, as CT has superior sensitivity (86%) compared to fluoroscopic studies alone (79%) for detecting clinically relevant leaks. 1
Primary Diagnostic Indication
Suspected anastomotic leak or repair site failure is the most critical indication for postoperative imaging after perforated ulcer repair. 1
- Clinical signs warranting imaging include: persistent abdominal pain, fever, tachycardia, leukocytosis, or failure to improve as expected postoperatively 1
- CT with oral contrast is the study of choice when leak is suspected, as it provides both anatomic detail and can identify associated complications like abscess formation 1
- Combined esophagography and CT together achieve 100% sensitivity for leak detection, with CT alone showing 86% sensitivity versus 79% for esophagography alone 1
Imaging Protocol Selection
The choice between fluoroscopic contrast study versus CT depends on clinical presentation and timing:
For immediate postoperative concerns (first 24-48 hours):
- Single-contrast esophagram with water-soluble contrast is preferred initially, as it is specifically designed to evaluate postoperative structural abnormalities 1
- Water-soluble contrast should always precede barium to avoid peritoneal contamination if perforation exists 1, 2
For delayed presentations (days to weeks postoperatively):
- CT with IV and oral contrast is superior when clinical suspicion remains high despite negative initial studies 1
- CT better defines anatomic structures, differentiates normal postoperative changes from pathology, and identifies complications like perigastric abscess (sensitivity 56.6%, specificity 95%) 1, 3
- The most sensitive CT finding for leak is perigastric abscess without visible contrast extravasation 3
Critical Diagnostic Pitfalls
A negative contrast study does NOT rule out leak. 1, 4
- Esophagography has only 36% sensitivity for detecting leaks despite 97% specificity 1
- If clinical suspicion persists despite negative imaging, diagnostic laparoscopy is mandatory 1, 4
- The mean time interval between initial postoperative imaging and diagnosis of leak can be 12.9 days, with leaks presenting up to 23.4 days postoperatively 3
Additional Indications Beyond Leak Detection
Other postoperative complications warranting CT imaging include: 1, 5
- Gastric outlet obstruction from edema or technical issues at the repair site 6
- Intra-abdominal abscess formation remote from the repair site 1, 3
- Missed underlying malignancy: 8.8% of perforated gastric ulcers harbor occult carcinoma, requiring follow-up endoscopy with biopsy rather than imaging 5
- Bowel obstruction from adhesions or other mechanical causes 1, 4
Algorithmic Approach to Postoperative Imaging
Clinical stability determines imaging strategy: 1
Hemodynamically unstable patient with peritonitis: Proceed directly to surgical re-exploration without imaging delay 1
Stable patient with concerning symptoms (fever, pain, tachycardia):
Routine postoperative screening: Not indicated, as routine contrast studies on postoperative day 1 have limited value and detect no leaks 3
Contrast Agent Considerations
- Water-soluble contrast first when perforation/leak suspected to avoid barium peritonitis 1, 2
- High-density barium may be added after negative water-soluble study to increase sensitivity for small leaks 1
- Oral contrast administration immediately before CT facilitates interpretation of esophageal/gastric integrity 1
- One study showed oral contrast did not change CT sensitivity for leak detection, but it aids anatomic delineation 1