What is the clinical significance of the Cd117 (Cluster of Differentiation 117) marker in diagnosis and treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CD117 (c-kit) Marker: Clinical Significance in Diagnosis and Treatment

CD117 is the cornerstone diagnostic marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with approximately 95% of GISTs showing positive immunohistochemical staining, making it both highly sensitive and specific for distinguishing GISTs from other mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. 1

Diagnostic Applications

Primary Role in GIST Diagnosis

  • CD117 expression with diffuse cytoplasmic staining pattern confirms GIST diagnosis when combined with compatible morphological features (spindle cell, epithelioid, or mixed cell types) 1
  • The marker shows intense staining in 75% of cases, with immunohistochemical positivity independent of KIT and PDGFRA mutational status 1
  • CD117 is more specific than CD34 for GIST diagnosis, as CD34 is expressed in various fibroblastic and endothelial tumors, whereas CD117 reliably separates GISTs from true leiomyomas and schwannomas 2

Complementary Markers When CD117 is Negative

  • Between 4-5% of GISTs with typical morphological features are CD117-negative, requiring additional diagnostic workup 1
  • For CD117-negative cases, DOG1 (discovered on GIST-1) immunostaining is highly recommended, as it is expressed in over 35% of CD117-negative GISTs 1
  • When both CD117 and DOG1 are negative, mandatory mutational analysis for KIT and PDGFRA genes should be performed at reference centers 1

Differential Diagnosis Utility

Distinguishing GISTs from Other Tumors

  • CD117 effectively differentiates GISTs from smooth muscle tumors (leiomyoma/leiomyosarcoma), schwannomas, and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, which are consistently CD117-negative 1, 2
  • True leiomyomas (desmin and actin-positive) and schwannomas in both gastrointestinal and peripheral locations are consistently negative for CD117 2
  • Solitary fibrous tumors and Kaposi's sarcomas, though typically CD34-positive, are consistently CD117-negative, providing clear diagnostic separation 2

Important Caveats

  • CD117 is not entirely specific to GISTs; it can be expressed in mastocytoses, seminomas, adenoid cystic carcinomas, thymic carcinomas, and melanomas 3
  • Approximately 9 of 25 metastatic melanomas and 7 of 15 clear cell sarcomas may show CD117 positivity 2
  • However, these non-GIST tumors typically lack KIT gene mutations, making mutational analysis critical for therapeutic decision-making 3

Therapeutic Implications

Predictive Value for Targeted Therapy

  • CD117 expression alone is insufficient to predict imatinib response; the presence of activating KIT mutations (found in 80-85% of GISTs) is required for sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors 4, 3
  • Imatinib is FDA-approved for Kit (CD117) positive unresectable and/or metastatic GISTs, as well as adjuvant treatment following resection of Kit-positive GISTs 4
  • Mutational analysis should be performed on all moderate or high-risk GISTs, specimens prior to neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy, and all unresectable/metastatic cases to guide treatment selection 1

Mutation-Specific Treatment Considerations

  • KIT exon 11 mutations (most common) respond to standard-dose imatinib (400mg) 1
  • KIT exon 9 mutations may benefit from high-dose imatinib (800mg) 1
  • PDGFRA p.D842V mutations are imatinib-resistant but may respond to avapritinib 1

Technical Considerations for Pathologists

Specimen Handling

  • Samples should be fixed in 4% buffered formalin; Bouin fixative must be avoided as it prevents molecular analysis 1
  • Immunohistochemistry should be performed without antigen retrieval, as this may result in false-positive CD117 staining 1
  • Fresh snap-frozen tissue collection is encouraged for subsequent molecular assessments 1

Reporting Requirements

  • The pathology report must include CD117 status along with tumor location, size, mitotic count (expressed as number of mitoses per 5 mm² total area), and margin status 1
  • Mitotic count should replace the conventional 50 high-power field measurement to standardize reporting 1

Clinical Algorithm for CD117-Negative Cases

When encountering a suspected GIST with negative CD117 staining:

  1. Perform DOG1 immunostaining immediately 1
  2. If DOG1 is also negative, order KIT and PDGFRA mutational analysis 1
  3. Refer complex cases to a reference sarcoma center with expertise in GIST diagnosis 1
  4. Consider SDHB immunohistochemistry for KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs, particularly in young patients with gastric location 1
  5. Be aware that dedifferentiation can occur de novo or after chronic imatinib exposure, representing a diagnostic pitfall 1

Beyond GISTs: Other Clinical Contexts

  • CD117 expression has been identified in approximately 75% of glial tumors, with higher expression in high-grade tumors like glioblastoma, though clinical utility for treatment selection remains investigational 5
  • The marker is expressed in normal hematopoietic stem cells, mast cells, melanocytes, and interstitial cells of Cajal 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

CD117: a sensitive marker for gastrointestinal stromal tumors that is more specific than CD34.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 1998

Research

[The diagnostic and predictive role of kit (CD117)].

Therapeutische Umschau. Revue therapeutique, 2006

Research

CD117 expression in glial tumors.

Journal of neuro-oncology, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.