Cornell Index EKG for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
The Cornell voltage criterion (S wave in V3 + R wave in aVL) is a highly specific ECG method for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy, using thresholds of >28 mm for men and >20 mm for women, with specificity of 85-90% but sensitivity typically <50%. 1
How to Calculate and Interpret Cornell Voltage
Measurement technique:
- Measure the S wave depth in lead V3 (in millimeters) 1
- Measure the R wave height in lead aVL (in millimeters) 1
- Add these two values together 1
- Positive for LVH if: Sum >28 mm in men OR >20 mm in women 2
Enhanced Cornell voltage-duration product:
- Multiply the Cornell voltage by QRS duration 2
- Positive for LVH if: Result >2440 mm·ms 2
- This product improves diagnostic accuracy over voltage alone 1
Clinical Significance and Prognostic Value
Cardiovascular risk stratification:
- Cornell voltage LVH predicts 29-98% increased risk of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure in treated hypertensive patients 3
- The presence of LVH by Cornell criteria carries independent prognostic value beyond other cardiovascular risk factors 3
- Cornell voltage-duration product allows detection of LVH in a higher proportion of subjects while maintaining high attributable risk for cardiovascular events 4
Comparison with other criteria:
- Only 11.2% of patients meeting Cornell voltage criteria also meet Sokolow-Lyon criteria, indicating these methods identify different patient populations 1
- Cornell criteria may have superior performance compared to traditional Sokolow-Lyon in certain populations 4
Factors That Affect Cornell Index Accuracy
Gender differences (critical adjustment):
- Women have lower voltage thresholds (>20 mm vs >28 mm for men) due to inherently lower QRS voltages 1, 2
- Gender-specific cutoffs significantly improve diagnostic performance 1
Age considerations:
- QRS voltages decline with increasing age, reducing sensitivity in elderly patients 1
- Standard criteria apply best to adults >35 years old 1
- Diagnosis in patients 16-35 years has low accuracy and is especially problematic in trained athletes 1
Body habitus effects:
- Obesity increases left ventricular mass but paradoxically decreases QRS voltage due to insulation effect of adipose tissue 1
- This creates false negatives in obese patients despite actual LVH presence 1
Supporting ECG Findings That Strengthen Diagnosis
When Cornell voltage is positive, look for:
- ST-T wave abnormalities (secondary repolarization changes): Strongly support LVH diagnosis and indicate more severe hypertrophy with larger left ventricular mass and higher cardiovascular risk 2, 5
- Left atrial abnormalities (P-wave changes): May be the earliest ECG sign of hypertensive heart disease 2, 5
- QRS duration prolongation: Attributed to increased ventricular wall thickness and intramural fibrosis 1
- Left axis deviation: Supportive but should not be used alone for diagnosis 2, 6
Critical Limitations and Pitfalls
Low sensitivity despite high specificity:
- Cornell voltage has sensitivity typically <50% but specificity 85-90% 1
- This means many patients with true LVH will have negative Cornell criteria (false negatives) 1
- However, positive results are highly reliable for confirming LVH (few false positives) 1
When Cornell criteria fail:
- Complete left bundle branch block: Cornell voltage cannot reliably diagnose LVH in this setting 5
- Right bundle branch block: Sensitivity is decreased but criteria may still be attempted 2
- Obesity: Creates false negatives despite actual LVH 1
Recommended approach:
- Apply multiple ECG criteria simultaneously rather than relying on Cornell voltage alone 1
- Specify which criteria are used when documenting LVH diagnosis 1
- Consider echocardiography for definitive diagnosis when clinical suspicion is high despite negative ECG criteria 1, 7
When to Use Cornell vs Other Criteria
Cornell voltage is particularly useful for:
- Screening in hypertensive populations where high specificity is valued 4, 3
- Risk stratification in treated hypertensive patients 3
- Situations where gender-adjusted criteria improve accuracy 1, 2
Consider alternative or additional criteria when: