Is high dose insulin (HDI) euglycemia therapy effective for treating aluminium phosphide poisoning?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

High-Dose Insulin Euglycemia Therapy for Aluminium Phosphide Poisoning

High-dose insulin euglycemia therapy appears to be highly effective and should be strongly considered as a primary treatment for aluminum phosphide poisoning, based on recent randomized controlled trial evidence showing dramatic mortality reduction from 96% to 65%. 1

Evidence for Insulin-Euglycemia Therapy in Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning

Mortality Benefit

  • A 2023 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that insulin-euglycemia therapy reduced mortality from 96.3% in the control group (receiving only norepinephrine and supportive care) to 64.8% in the intervention group (P <0.001). 1

  • This represents a substantial survival benefit in a poisoning with notoriously high mortality rates and no established antidote. 1

Hemodynamic Improvements

  • Insulin-euglycemia therapy significantly improved blood pressure parameters at 6 hours post-admission: median systolic BP was 80 mmHg versus 20 mmHg in controls, diastolic BP was 55 mmHg versus 10 mmHg, and mean arterial pressure was 65 mmHg versus 13 mmHg (P <0.001). 1

  • Patients receiving insulin-euglycemia required significantly lower doses of vasopressors (median 7 mg versus 26 mg norepinephrine; P = 0.006). 1

  • Fewer patients required intubation (61.1% versus 81.5% in controls; P = 0.019). 1

Metabolic Improvements

  • The therapy significantly improved bicarbonate and lactate concentrations, suggesting correction of metabolic acidosis. 1

  • An earlier 2020 pilot study using glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) infusion similarly showed reduced mortality (46.7% versus 73.3%; P = 0.03) and improved hemodynamic parameters. 2

Recommended Dosing Protocol

Standard High-Dose Insulin Regimen

  • Initial bolus of 1 U/kg regular insulin followed by continuous infusion at 1 U/kg/hr. 3

  • Concurrent dextrose infusion (typically D10 at 60 mL/hour providing 6 grams carbohydrates/hour) to maintain euglycemia. 3

  • Close monitoring of serum glucose and potassium levels is mandatory. 3

Monitoring Requirements

  • Frequent blood glucose monitoring (every 30-60 minutes initially) to prevent hypoglycemia. 3

  • Serial potassium measurements with supplementation as needed to prevent hypokalemia. 3

  • Continuous hemodynamic monitoring including blood pressure and cardiac function assessment. 1

Clinical Algorithm for Aluminum Phosphide Poisoning

Initial Assessment and Stabilization

  • Evaluate for signs of severe toxicity: hypotension, bradycardia, metabolic acidosis, and cardiac dysfunction. 1

  • Initiate standard resuscitative measures including airway management and IV access. 1

Primary Treatment Strategy

  • Start high-dose insulin euglycemia therapy early as primary intervention rather than relying solely on vasopressor support. 1

  • The 2023 trial demonstrated that vasopressor-only therapy was associated with very poor outcomes (96% mortality). 1

  • Add vasopressors (norepinephrine) as needed for blood pressure support, but insulin therapy should be the cornerstone. 1

Adjunctive Therapies to Consider

  • N-acetylcysteine (NAC) may provide additional mortality benefit: a 2023 meta-analysis showed reduced mortality with IV NAC (pooled risk ratio 0.5; 95% CI 0.32-0.77). 4

  • Combined therapy with trimetazidine, N-acetylcysteine, vitamin C, and hyperinsulinemia-euglycemia showed cardioprotective and hepatoprotective effects in animal models. 5

  • Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been reported as a novel therapy in severe cases with successful outcomes. 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Relying Solely on Vasopressors

  • The most important pitfall is treating aluminum phosphide poisoning with vasopressors alone without insulin therapy. The 2023 RCT showed this approach resulted in 96% mortality. 1

  • Vasopressors should be used as adjunctive therapy to insulin-euglycemia, not as monotherapy. 1

Delayed Initiation of Insulin Therapy

  • Early initiation of insulin-euglycemia therapy appears critical for optimal outcomes. 1

  • Do not wait for refractory shock to develop before starting insulin therapy. 1

Inadequate Glucose and Electrolyte Monitoring

  • Hyperglycemia can occur but is manageable with appropriate monitoring. 2

  • Hypoglycemia and hypokalemia are serious complications that require vigilant monitoring and correction. 3

Mechanistic Rationale

  • While the exact mechanism of aluminum phosphide toxicity remains incompletely defined, the dramatic hemodynamic improvement with insulin therapy suggests it addresses the core pathophysiology of cardiovascular collapse. 1, 5

  • Insulin improves cardiac contractility and facilitates myocardial carbohydrate utilization, similar to its mechanism in calcium channel blocker and beta-blocker poisoning. 3

  • The therapy appears to correct both the cardiogenic and vasodilatory components of shock in aluminum phosphide poisoning. 1

Important Distinction from Other Poisonings

  • The evidence base for insulin-euglycemia therapy in aluminum phosphide poisoning comes from direct randomized controlled trials in this specific poisoning, not extrapolation from calcium channel blocker or beta-blocker guidelines. 1, 2

  • This represents Level 1 evidence specifically for aluminum phosphide, making the recommendation particularly strong. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.