What Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) has the least incidence of cough?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ARB with Least Incidence of Cough

All ARBs have similarly low rates of cough that are comparable to placebo and significantly lower than ACE inhibitors, with no single ARB demonstrating superiority over others in terms of cough incidence.

Evidence from Guidelines and Clinical Trials

The available evidence does not differentiate between individual ARBs regarding cough incidence:

  • Class effect: ARBs as a class have cough rates similar to placebo or hydrochlorothiazide, and dramatically lower than ACE inhibitors 1. The mechanism explains this—ARBs do not inhibit ACE and therefore do not cause accumulation of bradykinin and substance P, the mediators responsible for ACE inhibitor-induced cough 1.

  • Losartan data: The most extensively studied ARB for cough is losartan, which showed a cough incidence of 29% in patients with prior ACE inhibitor-induced cough, compared to 72% with lisinopril and 34% with hydrochlorothiazide 2, 3. This 29% rate in a population selected for cough susceptibility demonstrates that losartan's cough rate approximates that of a diuretic 1, 4.

  • Valsartan data: In comparative trials, valsartan showed a cough incidence of 2.6% versus 7.9% with ACE inhibitors 5. In a specific study of patients with prior ACE inhibitor-induced cough, valsartan caused cough in only 20% of patients compared to 69% with lisinopril 5.

  • No comparative ARB studies: Importantly, no head-to-head trials have compared cough rates between different ARBs 1. The 2022 guidelines note "no sex-specific differences in cough" between ARBs 1.

Clinical Recommendation

When switching from an ACE inhibitor due to cough, any ARB is appropriate 1, 6, 4. The choice should be based on:

  • Comorbidities: Select based on cardiovascular or renal indications rather than cough profile
  • Dosing convenience: Once-daily formulations improve adherence
  • Cost and availability: All ARBs have equivalent cough profiles

Practical Algorithm for ARB Selection

  1. First-line options (based on guideline recommendations, not cough differences):

    • Losartan 25-50 mg daily (most studied in cough trials) 4, 7
    • Valsartan 80-160 mg daily 5
    • Candesartan 4-8 mg daily 4
  2. Monitoring after switch: Cough should resolve within 1-4 weeks, though may take up to 3 months in some patients 1, 6

  3. Important caveat: Rare cases of ARB-induced cough have been reported in post-marketing surveillance 7, 8. One case report documented losartan-induced cough that resolved with enalapril substitution, demonstrating idiosyncratic reactions can occur 8.

Key Clinical Pitfalls

  • Angioedema risk: Although rare, patients with prior ACE inhibitor-associated angioedema may experience angioedema with ARBs; use caution during initial treatment 4, 7

  • Renal monitoring: ARBs require the same renal function and potassium monitoring as ACE inhibitors 4

  • Elderly patients: Start with lower doses (e.g., losartan 25 mg, telmisartan 40 mg) and monitor for orthostatic hypotension 6, 4

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Modulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and cough.

The Canadian journal of cardiology, 1995

Guideline

Switching from Perindopril to ARB for ACE Inhibitor-Induced Cough

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of ACE Inhibitor-Induced Cough

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.