What is the maximum size of a common bile duct (CBD) stone that can be extracted by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Maximum Size of CBD Stone Extractable by ERCP

Standard ERCP with sphincterotomy and balloon/basket extraction can successfully remove CBD stones up to approximately 15 mm in diameter, with success rates declining dramatically for stones larger than this threshold. 1

Stone Size and Extraction Success Rates

Standard Extraction Techniques

  • Stones <10 mm: Nearly 100% successful extraction with standard ERCP techniques (sphincterotomy with balloon catheter or Dormia basket). 1
  • Stones 10-15 mm: Moderate success rates, often requiring mechanical lithotripsy as the next-line approach. 2
  • Stones >15 mm: Only 12% success rate with standard extraction techniques alone, requiring advanced interventions. 1
  • Stones up to 25 mm: Can be managed with mechanical lithotripsy when standard extraction fails. 2

Advanced Techniques for Larger Stones

For stones 15-25 mm, mechanical lithotripsy is the method of choice as the next step after failed standard extraction. 2 Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) has become the gold standard for large CBD stones up to 15 mm, reducing procedural time and device costs. 3

For stones >25 mm or very large/impacted stones, additional advanced lithotripsy techniques are required:

  • Laser lithotripsy shows the best results for CBD stones with 80-95% success rates. 2
  • Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) achieves similar 80-95% success rates but has higher tissue damage risk. 2
  • Peroral cholangioscopy with probe-based lithotripsy (electrohydraulic or laser) provides direct visualization for very large stones. 3

Clinical Management Algorithm

Initial Approach

Stones ≤15 mm: Proceed with standard ERCP, sphincterotomy, and balloon/basket extraction. 4, 1 Success is highly likely, with stones <10 mm having near-universal clearance rates. 1

Escalation for Difficult Stones

Stones 15-25 mm: Use EPLBD with prior sphincterotomy and mechanical lithotripsy. 4, 3 This combination is highly successful and cost-effective compared to multiple extraction attempts. 3

Stones >25 mm or impacted stones: Require cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy (laser or electrohydraulic) or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) when available. 4, 2 These techniques achieve 80-95% success rates for very large stones. 2

Important Caveats

Stone Size Measurement

Stone size should be measured on MRCP or ERCP cholangiograms with correction for magnification. 1 MRCP has diminishing sensitivity for stones <4 mm, which may spontaneously pass. 4, 5

Temporary Management

When immediate extraction fails, biliary stenting can reduce stone size over time (mean reduction from 24.9 mm to 20.1 mm after median 63 days), potentially facilitating subsequent removal. 6 However, stenting as definitive treatment should be restricted to patients with limited life expectancy or prohibitive surgical risk. 4

Alternative Approaches

For stones that cannot be removed despite advanced endoscopic techniques (EPLBD, mechanical lithotripsy, cholangioscopy), percutaneous radiological extraction or open duct exploration should be considered. 4 Laparoscopic bile duct exploration is also highly effective and can achieve near 100% clearance with intraductal lithotripsy. 4

Technical Limitations

The number of stones does not significantly affect success rates, but stone size is the critical determinant of extraction difficulty. 1 Stones in patients with altered anatomy from previous surgery may require alternative approaches regardless of size. 4

References

Research

Management of difficult common bile duct stones.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America, 2003

Research

Cracking Difficult Biliary Stones.

Clinical endoscopy, 2021

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Size of common bile duct stones on MRCP predicts likelihood of positive findings at ERCP.

The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.