What is the difference between Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Difference Between HLH and MAS

MAS is a specific subtype of secondary HLH that occurs exclusively in patients with underlying autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases (Still's disease, lupus, vasculitis), while HLH is the broader umbrella term encompassing both primary (genetic) and secondary (acquired) forms triggered by infections, malignancies, or autoimmune conditions. 1

Conceptual Framework

MAS and HLH share a common terminal pathway of hyperinflammation but have different pathogenetic roots. 1 Both are hyperferritinemic hyperinflammatory syndromes driven by aberrantly activated T cells and macrophages, resulting in a potentially fatal cytokine storm. 1

Key Distinguishing Features:

Underlying Disease Context:

  • MAS (also termed MAS-HLH) specifically refers to HLH arising on a background of systemic autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases, and the term should be restricted to patients with Still's disease (systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis/adult-onset Still's disease), systemic lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, and other related autoimmune systemic diseases. 1
  • HLH is the broader category that includes primary (genetic) forms caused by mutations affecting lymphocyte cytotoxicity, and secondary forms triggered by infections, malignancies, or autoimmune disorders. 1

Age Distribution:

  • Primary HLH is most common in children but can occur in adolescents and young adults. 1
  • Secondary HLH (including MAS) is most frequent in adults, with a mean age at onset of 49 years. 1

Diagnostic Biomarker Differences

Novel biomarkers can help differentiate MAS from other forms of HLH:

  • IL-18 levels: Free IL-18 levels are significantly higher in MAS associated with Still's disease compared to other forms of HLH, though IL-18BP levels do not differ between MAS and other HLH forms. 1
  • S100A12: Can differentiate MAS from both primary and secondary HLH with high sensitivity and specificity, particularly helpful when MAS presents at disease onset before the underlying autoimmune diagnosis is clear. 1
  • Activated CD8 T cells: While markedly elevated CD38high/HLA-DR+CD8+ T cells can differentiate MAS from active Still's disease, these populations are similarly increased in all forms of secondary HLH, meaning they do not differentiate MAS from other secondary HLH subtypes. 1

Treatment Implications

The distinction matters because treatment approaches may differ:

  • MAS treatment typically starts with high-dose corticosteroids as first-line therapy, with second-line options including cyclosporine A, anakinra, or tocilizumab—agents specifically targeting the autoimmune/autoinflammatory pathways. 1, 2
  • Other secondary HLH forms may require more aggressive immunosuppression with etoposide-containing regimens, particularly when triggered by malignancies or severe infections. 1, 2
  • Corticosteroids and/or IVIG may be sufficient as first-line therapy for patients with underlying rheumatologic disease presenting with MAS, whereas viral/infection-associated HLH more frequently requires etoposide. 3

Genetic Overlap

The distinction between primary and secondary HLH/MAS is increasingly blurred by genetic findings:

  • Heterozygous mutations in perforin-pathway genes have been found in MAS patients, potentially functioning as hypomorphic or partial dominant-negative alleles that contribute to disease pathogenesis. 4
  • This suggests a threshold model where genetic predisposition combines with chronic inflammation and/or infections to trigger MAS pathology. 4

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria rigidly for MAS: These criteria were developed for previously non-activated immune systems and do not perform well in MAS, where baseline immune activation (e.g., thrombocytosis and elevated fibrinogen in Still's disease) alters expected laboratory values. 5
  • Do not assume all secondary HLH is MAS: The term MAS should be reserved specifically for HLH in the context of autoimmune/autoinflammatory diseases, not for infection- or malignancy-triggered secondary HLH. 1
  • Do not overlook co-triggers: Patients with autoimmune disease may have both MAS and concurrent infection (e.g., EBV viremia), requiring treatment of both the autoimmune trigger and the infectious trigger. 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

HLH Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The genetics of macrophage activation syndrome.

Genes and immunity, 2020

Research

The History of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Autoimmune Diseases.

Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.