What is the recommended management for a spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (DP) for benign or low-grade malignant tumors in the distal pancreas?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy

For benign or low-grade malignant tumors in the distal pancreas, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) is the recommended approach when technically feasible, particularly for smaller tumors not involving the splenic vessels. 1

Indications for Spleen Preservation

Spleen preservation should be attempted for:

  • Insulinomas - smaller tumors not involving splenic vessels are ideal candidates for SPDP 1
  • Small peripheral tumors (<2 cm) - can undergo distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy 1
  • Benign or low-grade malignant lesions - SPDP is safe and effective for these pathologies 2, 3

Technical Approaches

Two main techniques exist for spleen preservation:

Kimura Technique (Splenic Vessel Preservation)

  • Preserves both splenic artery and vein 2
  • Preferred for lesions requiring less extensive pancreatic resection (typically <52 mm) 4
  • Associated with shorter operative times (201 min vs 256 min) 4

Warshaw Technique (Splenic Vessel Ligation)

  • Ligates splenic vessels while preserving short gastric vessels 1
  • Achieves lymph node retrieval comparable to en bloc splenectomy 1
  • Better suited for lesions requiring more extensive pancreatic resection (typically >95 mm) 4
  • No difference in splenic viability or complication rates compared to vessel preservation 4

Clinical Outcomes

SPDP demonstrates superior outcomes compared to conventional distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy:

  • Reduced infectious complications - 3% vs 18% intra-abdominal infections 3
  • Lower overall complication rates - 13% vs 34% 3
  • Eliminates risk of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI) 5, 3
  • Reduces postoperative venous thrombosis risk 5
  • No increase in operative time, blood loss, or hospital stay 5, 3
  • Pancreatic fistula rates remain comparable - 8.1% vs 13.3% 5

Laparoscopic Approach

Laparoscopic SPDP is safe and feasible with:

  • High success rate of spleen preservation - 91% 4
  • Mean operative time - 123 minutes 2
  • Low blood loss - 78 mL 2
  • Short hospital stay - 7.6 days 2
  • Clinical pancreatic fistula rate - 13.2% 2
  • No recurrence during median 38-month follow-up for benign and low-grade malignant lesions 2

Critical Caveats

Splenectomy is mandatory for:

  • Glucagonomas - typically malignant with regional node involvement requiring distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy 1, 6
  • VIPomas - require splenectomy with peripancreatic lymph node resection 1
  • Larger tumors (>2 cm) or malignant-appearing lesions - when adequate lymph node dissection is needed 1
  • Tumors with splenic vessel involvement - when vessels cannot be preserved 1

For glucagonomas specifically, perioperative anticoagulation should be considered due to hypercoagulable state and increased risk of pulmonary emboli. 1, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the technique must suit the lesion.

Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2014

Guideline

Management of Glucagonoma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.