What are the considerations for a subcostal view (x-ray view below the costal margin) in a patient at 6 weeks gestation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 3, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Subcostal Ultrasound View in 6 Weeks Pregnancy

In a patient at 6 weeks gestation, a subcostal ultrasound view is safe and appropriate for cardiac or IVC assessment, though the right upper quadrant transhepatic window may provide superior visualization and should be considered as an alternative approach.

Safety of Imaging Modalities at 6 Weeks Gestation

Ultrasound Safety

  • Ultrasound is completely safe at any gestational age, including 6 weeks, as it does not use ionizing radiation 1, 2
  • Ultrasound is recommended as the first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients across all clinical scenarios 2
  • There are no contraindications to performing subcostal ultrasound views in early pregnancy 1

If X-ray Imaging is Being Considered Instead

  • Chest radiography during the first trimester may be performed safely with minimal fetal risk 2
  • Simple X-rays with proper abdominal shielding carry negligible fetal radiation exposure of <0.1 mGy 2
  • Fetal doses below 50 mGy are not associated with detectable increases in adverse fetal outcomes 2
  • Most diagnostic X-ray studies deliver far less than 20 mGy to the uterus 2
  • The only statistically proven adverse effect at diagnostic radiation levels is a very small increase in childhood malignancy (one additional cancer death per 1,700 exposures at 10 mGy) 3

Technical Considerations for Subcostal Ultrasound View

Feasibility in Early Pregnancy

  • At 6 weeks gestation, the gravid uterus is still relatively small and should not significantly impede subcostal window access 4
  • The challenges with subcostal views described in the literature primarily apply to term pregnant women, not early first trimester 4

Alternative Approach if Subcostal View is Difficult

  • The right upper quadrant transhepatic window provides superior visualization of the IVC compared to the subcostal window in pregnant patients 4
  • In term pregnancy studies, the right upper quadrant window demonstrated:
    • Faster acquisition time (median 23 vs 52 seconds) 4
    • Higher success rate (100% vs 80%) 4
    • Better image quality as rated by independent reviewers 4
  • For cardiac assessment when subcostal views are inadequate, a left parasternal transthoracic view is an excellent alternative 5

Clinical Algorithm for Imaging Approach

For Cardiac or IVC Assessment at 6 Weeks Gestation:

  1. First attempt: Standard subcostal ultrasound view

    • Should be readily obtainable at this early gestational age 4
    • No radiation exposure or safety concerns 1, 2
  2. If subcostal view inadequate: Switch to alternative ultrasound windows

    • Right upper quadrant transhepatic window for IVC visualization 4
    • Left parasternal transthoracic view for cardiac assessment 5
  3. If ultrasound insufficient for diagnosis: Consider MRI without contrast

    • MRI is safe in pregnancy and does not expose the fetus to radiation 1, 2
    • Gadolinium-based contrast should be avoided unless absolutely necessary 2

Important Caveats

  • At 6 weeks gestation, the uterus has not yet enlarged enough to cause the technical difficulties with subcostal views that occur in late pregnancy 4
  • If chest X-ray is clinically indicated, do not withhold it due to pregnancy—the radiation risk is negligible with proper technique 2, 3
  • Always document pregnancy status and gestational age when performing any imaging study 2
  • The ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) should guide all imaging decisions, though ultrasound has no radiation concerns 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

X-ray Safety During Pregnancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnostic radiography in pregnancy: risks and reality.

The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2004

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.