CURB-65: Clinical Severity Score for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
CURB-65 is a validated 5-point clinical prediction tool that stratifies mortality risk in community-acquired pneumonia patients to guide hospital admission decisions, with each letter representing one clinical parameter that scores 1 point if present. 1, 2
The Five Components (Each Worth 1 Point)
- C = Confusion (new onset disorientation to person, place, or time) 1, 2
- U = Urea (Blood Urea Nitrogen >7 mmol/L or approximately >20 mg/dL) 1, 2
- R = Respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per minute 1, 2
- B = Blood pressure (systolic <90 mmHg OR diastolic ≤60 mmHg) 1, 2
- 65 = Age ≥65 years 1, 2
Risk Stratification and Management Recommendations
Score 0-1 (Low Risk):
- Mortality risk: 0.7-2.1% 2, 3
- Recommendation: Consider outpatient treatment 1, 2
- These patients can safely be managed at home with oral antibiotics 1
Score 2 (Intermediate Risk):
- Mortality risk: 9.2% 2, 3
- Recommendation: Consider short hospital stay or closely supervised outpatient treatment 1, 2
- Clinical judgment is particularly important in this group 2
Score 3 (High Risk):
Score 4-5 (Very High Risk):
Clinical Application Algorithm
Step 1: Calculate the score at point of care by assessing all five parameters 1
Step 2: Apply the risk stratification above, but recognize that CURB-65 must support, not replace, clinical judgment 1, 2
Step 3: Override the score when external factors are present 1, 2:
- Important comorbidities not captured by the score (HIV, immunosuppression) 1, 2
- Failure of prior outpatient antibiotic therapy 1, 2
- Social factors affecting medication adherence or follow-up 1, 2
- Need for procedures (pleural drainage, supplemental oxygen) 1
Advantages Over Other Scoring Systems
- Simplicity: Only 5 variables compared to 20 in the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), making it practical at the bedside 1, 2
- Minimal laboratory requirements: Only one blood test (urea/BUN) needed 2
- Speed: Can be calculated rapidly in emergency settings 2
- Validated effectiveness: Endorsed by American Thoracic Society, British Thoracic Society, and IDSA guidelines 1, 2
Simplified Alternative: CRB-65
When laboratory testing is unavailable, use CRB-65 (omits the Urea component, scoring 0-4 points instead of 0-5) 1, 2
- Particularly useful in outpatient clinics and resource-limited settings 2
- Maintains reasonable predictive accuracy without requiring blood work 1
Important Limitations and Pitfalls
CURB-65 may underestimate severity in: 2, 4
- Young patients (<65 years) with severe respiratory failure who lack age points
- Patients requiring critical care interventions despite low scores (15.6% of score 0-1 patients were admitted to ICU in one study) 4
CURB-65 performs less well for: 2
- ICU admission decisions specifically (use IDSA/ATS severe CAP criteria instead)
- Elderly nursing home patients with multiple comorbidities 5
Common pitfall: A score of 2 represents a "gray zone" where 27% required ICU admission and 15.4% needed critical care interventions 4. Do not automatically discharge these patients without careful assessment.
Practical Clinical Example
A 62-year-old patient with cough, fever, respiratory rate 24/min, normal blood pressure, no confusion, and BUN 14 mg/dL scores 0 points (age <65, all other parameters normal), suggesting safe outpatient treatment despite elevated white blood cell count, which is not part of the scoring system 1