What is the CURB-65 (Confusion, Urea, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, and age 65 or older) scoring system?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

CURB-65: Clinical Severity Score for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

CURB-65 is a validated 5-point clinical prediction tool that stratifies mortality risk in community-acquired pneumonia patients to guide hospital admission decisions, with each letter representing one clinical parameter that scores 1 point if present. 1, 2

The Five Components (Each Worth 1 Point)

  • C = Confusion (new onset disorientation to person, place, or time) 1, 2
  • U = Urea (Blood Urea Nitrogen >7 mmol/L or approximately >20 mg/dL) 1, 2
  • R = Respiratory rate ≥30 breaths per minute 1, 2
  • B = Blood pressure (systolic <90 mmHg OR diastolic ≤60 mmHg) 1, 2
  • 65 = Age ≥65 years 1, 2

Risk Stratification and Management Recommendations

Score 0-1 (Low Risk):

  • Mortality risk: 0.7-2.1% 2, 3
  • Recommendation: Consider outpatient treatment 1, 2
  • These patients can safely be managed at home with oral antibiotics 1

Score 2 (Intermediate Risk):

  • Mortality risk: 9.2% 2, 3
  • Recommendation: Consider short hospital stay or closely supervised outpatient treatment 1, 2
  • Clinical judgment is particularly important in this group 2

Score 3 (High Risk):

  • Mortality risk: 14.5% 2, 3
  • Recommendation: Hospital admission with assessment for ICU 2

Score 4-5 (Very High Risk):

  • Mortality risk: 40-60% 2, 3
  • Recommendation: Hospital admission with urgent ICU assessment 2

Clinical Application Algorithm

Step 1: Calculate the score at point of care by assessing all five parameters 1

Step 2: Apply the risk stratification above, but recognize that CURB-65 must support, not replace, clinical judgment 1, 2

Step 3: Override the score when external factors are present 1, 2:

  • Important comorbidities not captured by the score (HIV, immunosuppression) 1, 2
  • Failure of prior outpatient antibiotic therapy 1, 2
  • Social factors affecting medication adherence or follow-up 1, 2
  • Need for procedures (pleural drainage, supplemental oxygen) 1

Advantages Over Other Scoring Systems

  • Simplicity: Only 5 variables compared to 20 in the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), making it practical at the bedside 1, 2
  • Minimal laboratory requirements: Only one blood test (urea/BUN) needed 2
  • Speed: Can be calculated rapidly in emergency settings 2
  • Validated effectiveness: Endorsed by American Thoracic Society, British Thoracic Society, and IDSA guidelines 1, 2

Simplified Alternative: CRB-65

When laboratory testing is unavailable, use CRB-65 (omits the Urea component, scoring 0-4 points instead of 0-5) 1, 2

  • Particularly useful in outpatient clinics and resource-limited settings 2
  • Maintains reasonable predictive accuracy without requiring blood work 1

Important Limitations and Pitfalls

CURB-65 may underestimate severity in: 2, 4

  • Young patients (<65 years) with severe respiratory failure who lack age points
  • Patients requiring critical care interventions despite low scores (15.6% of score 0-1 patients were admitted to ICU in one study) 4

CURB-65 performs less well for: 2

  • ICU admission decisions specifically (use IDSA/ATS severe CAP criteria instead)
  • Elderly nursing home patients with multiple comorbidities 5

Common pitfall: A score of 2 represents a "gray zone" where 27% required ICU admission and 15.4% needed critical care interventions 4. Do not automatically discharge these patients without careful assessment.

Practical Clinical Example

A 62-year-old patient with cough, fever, respiratory rate 24/min, normal blood pressure, no confusion, and BUN 14 mg/dL scores 0 points (age <65, all other parameters normal), suggesting safe outpatient treatment despite elevated white blood cell count, which is not part of the scoring system 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Community-Acquired Pneumonia Severity Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.