How can wrong-site surgeries, such as operating on the incorrect leg during a total knee replacement, be prevented?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Prevention of Wrong-Site Surgery in Total Knee Replacement

Proper preoperative site marking by the surgeon, combined with multiple independent verification steps and a formal timeout procedure, is the cornerstone of preventing wrong-site surgery. 1

Critical Prevention Components

Preoperative Verification and Marking

  • The surgeon must personally discuss the planned procedure with the patient and mark the appropriate operative site before any sedation or anesthesia is administered 1, 2
  • The informed consent form must explicitly describe the procedure and operative site without abbreviations 1
  • Prior to administering any medications, nursing staff must independently ask the patient which site is to be operated on to ensure accuracy 1
  • Preoperative nursing staff must verify that the patient's verbal response, informed consent, and physician's orders all match for the operative site 1
  • For bilateral sites, standardized coding should be used (Right=1, Left=2, Bilateral=3) 1

Multiple Independent Checks

  • The patient is a more reliable source of accurate information than documents alone, and preoperative verification is the most effective step in preventing wrong-site surgery 2
  • Discrepancies among the operative record, consent, and surgeon's history and physical examination should be resolved prior to the day of surgery 2
  • Office chart notes must be physically available in the operating room for reference 1
  • Patients and circulating nurses are the surgeon's best allies in catching errors, with patients preventing 57 wrong-site surgeries and nurses preventing 30 in one state-wide analysis 3

Formal Timeout Protocol

  • A formal timeout must be performed verifying the patient's identity, planned procedure, operative site, and any implants or special equipment required before incision 1
  • The timeout must be conducted as a structured closed-loop communication process where information is stated and verbally confirmed by all team members 1
  • The circulating nurse must ensure the operative plan is visible so the surgeon can read it while gowned and gloved 1
  • The patient's name, operative site, and any implant information should be written on a visible whiteboard in the operating room 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Timing Issues

  • Many errors occur before the formal timeout, particularly during patient positioning (20 cases) and anesthesia interventions (29 cases) that happen before verification processes 3
  • Marking the operative site gives patients a voice after they are sedated or anesthesia is induced, preventing errors that occur once the patient can no longer communicate 2

Process Failures

  • Not verifying consents (22 cases) or site markings (16 cases) contributed to wrong-site surgery in state-wide reporting 3
  • Interestingly, 31 formal timeout processes were unsuccessful in preventing wrong-site surgery, indicating that the timeout alone is insufficient without proper preceding verification steps 3
  • Site markings must be visible after draping, yet only 55.6% of marked cases maintained visible markings 4

Team Communication

  • Junior members of the operating room team must be made comfortable speaking up if concerned about any discrepancy 2
  • The operating surgeon should personally mark the patient in the majority of cases rather than delegating this critical task 4

Why the Nurse Must Speak Up

The scenario described—where a nurse knew but kept quiet—represents a catastrophic failure of safety culture. 1 Establishing a culture of respect and collaboration that prioritizes patient safety is essential, with a "just culture" approach to error reporting that encourages transparency rather than punishment 1. Non-punitive quality assurance systems for incident reporting are essential for continuous improvement 1.

Implementation Requirements

  • Develop written policies specifically addressing wrong-site surgery prevention 1
  • Provide adequate training for new staff on wrong-site prevention protocols 1
  • Use simulation-based training to practice timeout procedures and closed-loop communication 1
  • Conduct regular audits of compliance with site verification protocols 1
  • Wrong-site surgery occurs an estimated 40 times per week in U.S. hospitals, with lower extremity procedures being the most common (30%), making total knee replacement a high-risk procedure requiring uncompromising vigilance 3, 5

References

Guideline

Preventing Wrong-Site Surgery: Core Strategies and Implementation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Wrong-site surgery: can we prevent it?

Advances in surgery, 2008

Research

Getting surgery right.

Annals of surgery, 2007

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.