What is the cure rate of cefixime for uncomplicated gonorrhea?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefixime Cure Rate for Gonorrhea

Cefixime 400 mg orally as a single dose achieves a cure rate of 97.4% for uncomplicated urogenital and anorectal gonorrhea, making it an effective oral alternative to intramuscular ceftriaxone, though it provides lower and less sustained bactericidal levels. 1

Historical Efficacy Data

The CDC guidelines from 2002 established cefixime 400 mg as a recommended first-line regimen based on clinical trial data showing:

  • 97.4% cure rate for uncomplicated urogenital and anorectal infections 1
  • 96% overall cure rate (89 of 93 patients) in a major randomized trial comparing it to ceftriaxone 2
  • 98% cure rate in another comparative study (118 of 121 evaluable patients) 3
  • 97% bacteriologic eradication (105 of 108 patients) in a third trial 4

These cure rates are slightly lower than ceftriaxone's 99.1% efficacy but still meet the therapeutic threshold of >95% for first-line treatment. 1

Comparative Performance

Urogenital and Rectal Sites

Cefixime performs well at these anatomic sites, with cure rates consistently above 96% across multiple studies. 2, 3, 4 The drug maintains efficacy regardless of antimicrobial resistance patterns, including against penicillinase-producing N. gonorrhoeae (PPNG) and tetracycline-resistant strains (TRNG). 2, 4

Pharyngeal Infections

For pharyngeal gonorrhea, cefixime shows 91% efficacy (20 of 22 patients cured), which is acceptable but less robust than urogenital sites. 2 This is an important consideration since pharyngeal infections are notoriously difficult to eradicate. 1

Pharmacodynamic Limitations

The critical caveat is that cefixime 400 mg does not provide as high or sustained bactericidal blood levels as ceftriaxone 125 mg IM. 1, 5 Pharmacodynamic analysis shows cefixime maintains free drug concentrations above the MIC90 for 22-50 hours, which is adequate but represents the lower end of the therapeutic window. 6

Clinical Advantages

  • Oral administration eliminates the need for injection, improving patient acceptance and ease of delivery 1, 2
  • Well-tolerated with self-limiting gastrointestinal side effects in only 10% of patients 4
  • Cost-effective compared to injectable alternatives 2

Important Caveats

Resistance Concerns

While cefixime was effective against resistant strains in earlier studies 2, 4, ongoing surveillance is critical as cephalosporin resistance patterns evolve. 1 The lower bactericidal levels compared to ceftriaxone theoretically provide less margin for emerging resistance. 6

Availability Issues

Cefixime 400 mg tablets were unavailable in the United States from 2002-2008, which limited its use during that period. 7 Clinicians should verify current availability in their region.

Chlamydia Co-treatment

Cefixime does not treat concurrent chlamydial infection, which persists in at least 50% of co-infected patients. 2 Always add azithromycin 1 g orally or doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for 7 days unless chlamydia is ruled out. 1

Not for Complicated Infections

These cure rates apply only to uncomplicated urogenital, anorectal, and pharyngeal infections. 1 For disseminated gonococcal infection or other complications, parenteral ceftriaxone is required.

Current Treatment Context

While cefixime remains an effective oral option with a 97.4% cure rate, ceftriaxone 125 mg IM achieves 99.1% cure rates and provides superior pharmacodynamics. 1 In settings where injection is feasible, ceftriaxone is preferred. However, when oral therapy is necessary or injection is not practical, cefixime 400 mg remains a valid choice with documented efficacy above the 95% threshold for first-line therapy.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.