Treatment Approach for Thrombotic Microangiopathy
Immediate plasma exchange with high-dose glucocorticoids and rituximab is the first-line treatment for suspected TTP, while aggressive blood pressure control is the primary intervention for malignant hypertension-associated TMA, and eculizumab is indicated for atypical HUS. 1, 2
Immediate Diagnostic Workup
The critical first step is distinguishing between TMA subtypes, as treatment differs dramatically and delays increase mortality 1:
- Obtain ADAMTS13 activity and inhibitor levels immediately to differentiate TTP from other forms—do not wait for results before initiating treatment if TTP is suspected 1
- Examine peripheral blood smear for schistocytes and measure CBC, LDH, haptoglobin (typically unmeasurable in TMA), renal function, and coagulation studies 1
- Assess blood pressure as severe hypertension with advanced retinopathy (flame hemorrhages, cotton wool spots, papilledema) suggests hypertension-induced TMA rather than TTP or HUS 3
Treatment Algorithm Based on TMA Subtype
For Suspected TTP (ADAMTS13 deficiency)
Begin plasma exchange immediately—within hours of suspicion—along with high-dose glucocorticoids and rituximab 1:
- TTP presents with more severe thrombocytopenia and numerous schistocytes compared to hypertension-induced TMA 3
- Very low ADAMTS13 activity (<10%) confirms TTP, while normal or slightly reduced levels suggest hypertension-induced TMA 3
- Caplacizumab provides significantly better remission rates and decreases TMA-related death 4
For Atypical HUS (aHUS)
Eculizumab (complement inhibitor) is FDA-approved and indicated for aHUS to inhibit complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy 2:
- This represents a major therapeutic advance, as eculizumab treats aHUS successfully by blocking the dysregulated complement system 4
- Critical caveat: Eculizumab is NOT indicated for Shiga toxin E. coli-related HUS (STEC-HUS) 2
- Pregnant patients with TMA history should receive hydroxychloroquine continuation and low-dose aspirin before 16 weeks gestation 1
For Malignant Hypertension-Associated TMA
Aggressive blood pressure lowering is the primary and often sole intervention needed 3, 1:
- This form typically shows only moderate thrombocytopenia and few schistocytes, distinguishing it from TTP and HUS 3
- BP-lowering treatment improves TMA within 24-48 hours, whereas TTP and HUS require different therapies 3
- High systolic blood pressure (>140 mmHg) on admission carries a sevenfold increased risk of severe kidney disease 5
- Mean arterial pressure >100 mmHg indicates fourfold increased risk for acute renal failure 5
Key Clinical Pitfalls
The coexistence of severe BP elevation with advanced retinopathy (bilateral flame hemorrhages, cotton wool spots, papilledema) is usually sufficient to discriminate malignant hypertension-induced TMA from TTP or HUS 3:
- Do not delay plasma exchange for suspected TTP while awaiting ADAMTS13 results—mortality increases significantly with treatment delays 1
- High C-reactive protein levels on admission correlate with renal failure during disease course 5
- Older age is an independent risk factor for death in TMA 5
- TMA more commonly occurs secondary to coexisting conditions (infection, pregnancy, autoimmune disease, malignancy) than as primary TTP or HUS 6
Special Therapeutic Considerations
- Defibrotide has been established in phase III studies for therapy-associated TMA (veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) to significantly improve outcomes 4
- Daily plasma exchange and fresh frozen plasma infusion remain the mainstay for TTP when newer agents are unavailable 4, 7
- Immunosuppressants may be added as adjunctive therapy for refractory cases 7