Sliding Scale Insulin Alone Should Not Be Used for Glucose Over 130 mg/dL
Sliding scale insulin (SSI) as a sole therapy is strongly discouraged for hospitalized patients and should be replaced with a scheduled basal-bolus insulin regimen, which provides superior glycemic control and reduces complications. 1, 2
Why Sliding Scale Insulin Fails
Sliding scale insulin is a reactive approach that treats hyperglycemia after it occurs, leading to:
- Rapid blood glucose fluctuations that worsen both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia 2
- Poor glycemic control, with only 38% of patients achieving mean blood glucose <140 mg/dL compared to 68% with basal-bolus regimens 2
- Ineffective outcomes, with 84% of SSI injections failing to bring glucose into target range (90-130 mg/dL) 3
- Persistent hyperglycemia without corresponding adjustments in insulin dosing in 81% of patients 3
The Recommended Approach: Basal-Bolus Insulin
For patients with glucose consistently >130 mg/dL, implement a scheduled basal-bolus regimen rather than relying on SSI alone:
Initial Dosing Strategy
For insulin-naive patients or those on low insulin doses:
- Start with 0.3-0.5 units/kg total daily dose (TDD) 1, 2
- Allocate 50% to basal insulin (given once or twice daily) 1
- Allocate 50% to rapid-acting insulin (divided before three meals) 1
- Use lower doses (0.1-0.25 units/kg) for high-risk patients: elderly (>65 years), renal failure, poor oral intake 1
For patients already on insulin at home:
- If using ≥0.6 units/kg/day, reduce home TDD by 20% during hospitalization to prevent hypoglycemia 1, 2
When SSI May Be Acceptable (Limited Circumstances)
SSI alone can be considered only in highly specific situations 1:
- Patients without diabetes who have mild stress hyperglycemia 2
- Patients with good baseline control (HbA1c <7%) on diet or low-dose oral agents 1
- Patients who are NPO with no nutritional replacement 1
However, even in these cases, if glucose cannot be maintained <180 mg/dL, basal insulin must be added. 1
Evidence for Superiority of Basal-Bolus Regimens
Randomized trials consistently demonstrate 1, 2:
- Better glycemic control with basal-bolus versus SSI alone in type 2 diabetes
- Reduced complications including postoperative wound infections, pneumonia, bacteremia, and acute renal/respiratory failure 1
- More predictable glucose patterns by providing proactive rather than reactive insulin coverage
Critical Pitfall to Avoid
Never use SSI alone in patients with type 1 diabetes - this population requires continuous insulin coverage and SSI monotherapy can lead to diabetic ketoacidosis 1
Hypoglycemia Risk Considerations
While basal-bolus regimens carry 4-6 times higher hypoglycemia risk than SSI (12-30% incidence in controlled settings), this reflects more aggressive glucose control rather than inappropriate therapy 1. The key is proper dosing and monitoring:
- Reassess the regimen if glucose falls <100 mg/dL 1
- Modify the regimen when glucose is <70 mg/dL 1
- Consider a basal-plus approach (basal insulin + correction doses only) for patients with mild hyperglycemia (<200 mg/dL), decreased oral intake, or surgical patients 1
Practical Implementation
For a patient with glucose >130 mg/dL on a 1:15 sliding scale:
- Calculate TDD: For a 70 kg patient = 0.4 units/kg × 70 kg = 28 units total daily
- Divide dosing: 14 units basal (e.g., glargine once daily) + 14 units rapid-acting (approximately 5 units before each meal)
- Add correction doses using the 1:15 ratio for glucose >130 mg/dL as supplemental coverage 2
- Adjust based on response: If correction doses are frequently needed, increase scheduled insulin accordingly 2