Management of Foreign Body Ingestion Not Visible on X-ray
Primary Recommendation
A negative X-ray does not rule out foreign body ingestion—proceed with CT scan for symptomatic patients or those with high clinical suspicion, as plain radiography has false-negative rates up to 47% for esophageal foreign bodies and up to 85% for food bolus, fish bones, chicken bones, and non-radiopaque objects. 1
Diagnostic Algorithm When X-ray is Negative
Step 1: Recognize the Limitations of Plain Radiography
- Plain X-rays miss many foreign bodies due to low radiopacity, including:
- The overall false-negative rate for esophageal foreign bodies is up to 47% 1
Step 2: Obtain CT Scan as the Next Imaging Study
CT scan should be performed in patients with suspected perforation or persistent symptoms despite negative X-ray 1
- CT has 90-100% sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies (compared to only 32% for plain X-ray in fish bone ingestion) 1, 2
- CT specificity is 93.7-100% 1
- CT is essential for:
Step 3: Proceed with Endoscopy Based on Clinical Presentation
In patients with persistent esophageal symptoms, endoscopic evaluation should be performed even if radiographic examination is negative 1, 2
Timing of Endoscopy:
Emergent endoscopy (within 2-6 hours) for:
Urgent endoscopy (within 24 hours) for:
What NOT to Do
Avoid Contrast Studies
Contrast swallow (barium or gastrografin) is NOT recommended and should not delay other investigations 1, 2
- Increased aspiration risk in patients with complete obstruction 1
- Barium coats the foreign body and mucosa, impairing endoscopic visualization 1
- Does not provide superior diagnostic information compared to CT 1
Exception: Water-soluble contrast enema may be used for anorectal foreign bodies only if CT is unavailable, to evaluate for rectal perforation or fistula 1
Initial Laboratory Workup
For symptomatic patients or those requiring intervention, obtain: 1, 2
- Complete blood count (CBC)
- C-reactive protein (CRP)
- Blood gas analysis for base excess and lactate
- Serum creatinine and inflammatory markers if perforation suspected 1
Location-Specific Considerations
Esophageal Foreign Bodies
- 80-90% of ingested foreign bodies that reach the stomach pass spontaneously 1, 3
- However, esophageal foreign bodies require intervention due to risk of aspiration and perforation 1, 2
- During endoscopy, attempt gentle pushing into stomach first (90% success rate), then retrieval if pushing fails 2
Anorectal Foreign Bodies
- Non-visualization on X-ray does not rule out retained anorectal foreign body 1
- CT scan is the next step for non-radiopaque objects 1
- Digital rectal examination should be performed carefully, preferably after imaging to avoid injury from sharp objects 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not rely solely on negative X-ray to exclude foreign body 1—the false-negative rate is too high for many object types
Do not delay endoscopy for contrast studies 1, 2—this increases risk without improving diagnostic yield
Do not assume asymptomatic patients are foreign body-free 4—16% of pediatric patients with confirmed foreign bodies had no symptoms
Do not forget to obtain biopsies during endoscopy 2—up to 46% of food impaction patients have underlying eosinophilic esophagitis
For anorectal foreign bodies, do not attempt bedside extraction if perforation or hemodynamic instability is present 1—proceed directly to surgical exploration