Management of Suspected Throat Foreign Body Not Visible on X-ray
A negative X-ray does not rule out a foreign body, and you should proceed directly to CT scan in symptomatic patients or those with high clinical suspicion, followed by laryngoscopy/endoscopy based on findings. 1
Diagnostic Limitations of X-ray
- Plain radiography has a false-negative rate up to 47% for esophageal foreign bodies and up to 85% for food bolus, fish bones, chicken bones, and other non-radiopaque objects 1
- Routine use of radiographs in assessing throat foreign bodies is inappropriate and should not guide clinical decision-making 2
- Many foreign bodies have very low radiopacity and will not be visualized on plain films 3
Immediate Next Steps
For symptomatic patients with negative X-ray, obtain CT scan immediately - it has 90-100% sensitivity and 93.7-100% specificity for detecting foreign bodies 1
Clinical Examination Priority
- Perform thorough visual inspection of the oropharynx looking for visible foreign bodies that can be manually extracted 3
- Never perform blind finger sweeps - this can impact the foreign body deeper or cause injury to the nasopharynx 3
- Only manually extract objects that are clearly visible in the mouth 3
Laryngoscopy Indications
- Indirect laryngoscopy has high diagnostic yield and should be performed in patients with persistent foreign body sensation 2
- In one study, 84.7% of patients referred to ENT underwent indirect laryngoscopy, which identified foreign bodies in 17.3% and other pathology in 4.8% 2
CT Scan Protocol
- CT is essential for locating non-radiopaque objects, evaluating for perforation, and assessing complications 3, 1
- Obtain contrast-enhanced CT of the neck and chest in hemodynamically stable patients with suspected perforation 3
- CT should evaluate for pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema, and soft tissue inflammation suggesting perforation 1
Laboratory Workup
For symptomatic patients requiring intervention:
- Complete blood count (CBC) 1
- C-reactive protein (CRP) and inflammatory markers if perforation suspected 3, 1
- Serum creatinine 3, 1
- Blood gas analysis in severe cases 1
Endoscopy Timing Based on Location and Symptoms
Emergent Endoscopy (within 2-6 hours):
Urgent Endoscopy (within 24 hours):
- Partial esophageal obstruction 1
- Food bolus impaction without complete obstruction 1
- Persistent symptoms despite negative imaging 1
Airway Management Considerations
- If the patient has ineffective cough and suspected airway obstruction, encourage coughing first as this is physiologic and unlikely to cause harm 3
- Use back blows initially if coughing is ineffective 3
- Follow with abdominal thrusts if back blows fail (in patients >1 year old) 3
- Appropriately skilled healthcare providers should use Magill forceps for visible foreign body airway obstruction 3
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not dismiss symptoms based on negative X-ray alone - this is the most critical error, as up to 85% of certain foreign bodies are not visible radiographically 1
- Do not delay CT imaging in symptomatic patients waiting for "observation" 1
- Avoid blind instrumentation of the pharynx, which can cause injury or worsen obstruction 3
- Consider alternative diagnoses such as acute epiglottitis, which can present similarly to foreign body sensation 4
- Remember that thyroid cartilage displacement can mimic foreign body sensation and requires different management 5
Special Considerations
- In patients with suspected perforation and hemodynamic instability, proceed directly to surgical intervention without delaying for imaging 3
- Esophageal foreign bodies require intervention due to aspiration and perforation risk - attempt gentle pushing into stomach during endoscopy first, then retrieval if pushing fails 1
- Repeat imaging after extraction is generally not necessary unless new symptoms develop, as plain films have low sensitivity for pneumoperitoneum 3