What is the average depth of a Non-Cariously Cervical Lesion (NCCL) that can cause pulpal irritation or pathology?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Average Depth of NCCL Causing Pulpal Irritation/Pathology

Based on clinical investigations, the vast majority (91%) of non-carious cervical lesions have axial depths of 1-2 mm, and these lesions typically exhibit mild to moderate sclerotic dentin (76%) with minimal sensitivity (73% showing no or mild sensitivity), indicating that pulpal irritation is uncommon at these depths. 1

Depth Characteristics and Pulpal Response

Typical NCCL Dimensions

  • 91% of NCCLs have axial depths between 1-2 mm 1
  • 49% have occlusogingival widths of 1-2 mm 1
  • These dimensions represent the most common presentation in clinical practice 1

Protective Pulpal Responses at Common Depths

The tooth responds to NCCL formation through several protective mechanisms that prevent pulpal pathology:

  • Dead tracts are present in 88% of teeth with NCCLs, with 62% located directly adjacent to the defect 2
  • Sclerotic dentin forms in 48% of cases immediately next to the lesion, providing a protective barrier 2
  • Tertiary dentin deposition occurs in 60% of teeth with NCCLs 2
  • 76% of lesions demonstrate mild to moderate sclerosis 1

Clinical Sensitivity Profile

The sensitivity profile suggests that pulpal irritation is not a primary concern at typical NCCL depths:

  • 73% of NCCLs present with no or mild sensitivity 1
  • Only a minority of lesions cause significant discomfort despite their presence 1

Clinical Decision Algorithm for Treatment

When to Intervene Based on Depth and Symptoms

Conservative management through prevention is recommended, with restorative treatment delayed until necessary based on specific clinical indicators rather than depth alone 3

Indications for restoration include:

  • Lesion progression documented over time 3
  • Impact on patient's quality of life 3
  • Persistent sensitivity despite conservative measures 3
  • Poor esthetics affecting patient satisfaction 3
  • Food collection causing discomfort or hygiene issues 3

Important Clinical Considerations

The sclerotic dentin present in most NCCLs (76%) acts as a natural barrier, explaining why pulpal pathology is rare even at 1-2 mm depths 1, 2. This sclerotic layer requires special consideration during restoration, as it does not etch like normal dentin and may require surface texturing with a fine diamond instrument to improve restoration retention 3.

The multifactorial etiology (excessive horizontal toothbrushing, acidic diet, potential occlusal factors) means that addressing causative factors is more important than immediate restoration based solely on depth 3, 4.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume depth alone indicates need for treatment - the presence of protective sclerotic dentin and tertiary dentin formation means most lesions at 1-2 mm depth do not cause pulpal pathology 1, 2
  • Avoid premature restoration - conservative management through prevention should be the first approach unless specific clinical indicators are present 3
  • Do not overlook the protective responses - dead tracts, sclerotic dentin, and tertiary dentin formation are present in the majority of NCCLs and protect the pulp 2

References

Research

Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions: a clinical investigation.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2002

Research

The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions.

Clinical oral investigations, 2014

Research

Noncarious cervical lesions: Morphology and progression, prevalence, etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical guidelines for restoration.

Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.