What is the purpose and explanation of each statement in the Behaviour Feeding Problem Assessment Scale (BFPAS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) Overview

The Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS) is a parent-report questionnaire designed to identify feeding difficulties in young children by measuring the frequency of undesirable mealtime behaviors and the degree to which parents perceive these behaviors as problematic. 1

Purpose and Structure

The BPFAS serves as a screening tool to distinguish children with clinically significant feeding problems from typically developing children through standardized parent reporting. 2 The scale has demonstrated:

  • High test-retest reliability over a 2-week period 2
  • Strong internal consistency across multiple validation studies 1
  • High specificity in detecting feeding difficulties, making it particularly useful for ruling out feeding disorders when scores are normal 2

Key Components Assessed

The BPFAS evaluates two primary dimensions:

Frequency of Feeding Behaviors

Parents rate how often specific mealtime behaviors occur, capturing patterns such as:

  • Food refusal behaviors during meals 3
  • Rapid eating patterns 3
  • Chewing difficulties 3
  • Food selectivity (limited dietary variety) 3
  • Vomiting episodes 3
  • Food-stealing behaviors 3

Problem Perception

Parents indicate which behaviors they perceive as problematic, providing insight into the impact on family functioning. 2 Typically developing children display few undesirable feeding behaviors, and parents report few concerns; therefore, any child with a large number of reported problems warrants immediate multidisciplinary evaluation. 2

Clinical Interpretation

The BPFAS demonstrates significant discrimination between typically developing children and those with feeding difficulties, with statistically significant differences in both frequency scores (P < 0.01) and problem perception scores (P < 0.01). 2

Responsiveness to Intervention

The scale is sensitive to treatment effects, with all subscales showing improvement following therapeutic intervention:

  • Scores decrease from clinically significant ranges to levels comparable with non-feeding-problem children after targeted treatment 4
  • Problem scores on the BPFAS predict 15% of variance in improved dietary variety following intervention 4

Comparative Performance

The BPFAS has the most comprehensive reliability and validity data of any parent-administered feeding questionnaire for preschool children. 1 When compared to other feeding assessment tools:

  • More predictive and concurrent validity data exists for the BPFAS than most alternative measures 1
  • Australian, Canadian, and UK normative data show comparable performance across international samples 2
  • The scale maintains reliability across diverse populations including children with autism, other special needs, and typically developing children 3

Clinical Application

Given its simplicity of administration, high reliability, and high specificity, the BPFAS is recommended as a screening tool for physicians working with young children. 2 The scale should be used:

  • As an initial screening instrument to identify children requiring further evaluation 2
  • To monitor treatment progress in children with established feeding disorders 4
  • In conjunction with multidisciplinary assessment including medical, nutritional, occupational therapy, and physical therapy evaluations when feeding problems are identified 5

Important Caveats

Parent report through the BPFAS captures feeding behaviors in naturalistic home environments over time, providing advantages over time-limited clinic observations. 1 However:

  • The scale relies on parent perception, which may be influenced by parenting style—overly permissive parental actions explain over 34% of links between feeding problems and poor outcomes 3
  • Positive screening results require comprehensive follow-up assessment rather than serving as definitive diagnostic tools 2
  • The BPFAS should be integrated with direct behavioral observation and medical evaluation for complete assessment of feeding disorders 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.