What is the difference between Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome and Lown-Ganong-Levine (LGL) syndrome in terms of electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, causes, and management strategies?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Wolff-Parkinson-White vs Lown-Ganong-Levine Syndrome: Key Differences

WPW syndrome and LGL syndrome are both pre-excitation syndromes with short PR intervals, but WPW features a delta wave and wide QRS complex due to an accessory pathway bypassing the AV node, while LGL syndrome shows a short PR interval with a normal narrow QRS complex, likely due to enhanced AV nodal conduction or a James bundle. 1, 2

ECG Changes

Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

  • PR interval <0.12 seconds 1
  • Delta wave (slurring of initial QRS segment) - the pathognomonic feature 1
  • Wide QRS complex >0.12 seconds 1
  • Secondary ST-T wave changes that are discordant (opposite direction) to the major delta wave and QRS complex 1
  • The degree of pre-excitation varies based on relative conduction through the AV node versus the accessory pathway 3
  • Intermittent pre-excitation (abrupt loss of delta wave) indicates a longer accessory pathway refractory period and lower risk 3

Lown-Ganong-Levine Syndrome

  • Short PR interval 2
  • Narrow, pointed, positive P wave 2
  • Normal narrow QRS complex (no delta wave) 2
  • Tendency to respiratory arrhythmia 2

Causes and Pathophysiology

WPW Syndrome

  • Accessory pathway (Bundle of Kent) creates a direct electrical connection between atria and ventricles, bypassing the AV node 1
  • Prevalence of 0.15-0.25% in general population 3
  • Higher prevalence (0.55%) in first-degree relatives, suggesting genetic component 3
  • Associated conditions include:
    • Ebstein's anomaly (increases sudden death risk) 3
    • Multiple accessory pathways 3
    • Familial WPW (rare but high sudden death risk) 3
    • MELAS syndrome or LEOPARD syndrome 4

LGL Syndrome

  • James bundle or short AV conduction pathway with small heart 2
  • Enhanced AV nodal conduction 2
  • Commonly affects young women with autonomic dystonia 2
  • Associated with paroxysmal tachycardia tendency 2

Management Strategy

WPW Syndrome - Definitive Treatment

Catheter ablation is the first-line definitive therapy for symptomatic WPW patients, particularly those with syncope, documented AF, or short bypass tract refractory period (<250 ms). 3, 5

Indications for Catheter Ablation (Class I)

  • Symptomatic patients with AF and WPW syndrome 3
  • Syncope due to rapid heart rate 3
  • Short bypass tract refractory period (<250 ms) 3
  • Success rates: 88-95% primary success, 93-98.5% final success after repeat procedures 5
  • Complication rates: 1-2% with experienced operators 5
  • Procedure duration: approximately 4.5 hours 5

WPW Syndrome - Acute Management

Hemodynamically Unstable AF with Rapid Ventricular Response

Immediate electrical cardioversion is mandatory to prevent ventricular fibrillation. 3

Hemodynamically Stable Pre-excited AF

  • Intravenous procainamide or ibutilide for wide QRS complex (≥120 ms) 3
  • Alternative agents: quinidine, disopyramide, amiodarone (Class IIb) 3

Critical Contraindications (Class III)

Never administer AV nodal blocking agents in WPW with pre-excited AF: 3

  • Digoxin - contraindicated 3
  • Diltiazem - contraindicated 3
  • Verapamil - contraindicated 3
  • Beta-blockers - contraindicated (ineffective and may cause hemodynamic compromise) 3

These agents increase AV nodal refractoriness, encouraging preferential conduction over the accessory pathway, potentially accelerating ventricular response and precipitating ventricular fibrillation 3

Narrow QRS Tachycardia in WPW

  • Intravenous adenosine may be used when QRS <120 ms, indicating anterograde conduction through AV node 3

WPW Syndrome - Risk Stratification

High-risk features for sudden cardiac death: 3, 6

  • Shortest pre-excited R-R interval <250 ms during AF 3, 6
  • History of symptomatic tachycardia 3, 6
  • Multiple accessory pathways 3, 6
  • Ebstein's anomaly 3, 6
  • Familial WPW 3, 6

Sudden cardiac death incidence: 0.15-0.39% over 3-10 years follow-up 3, 6

LGL Syndrome - Management

The provided evidence does not contain specific management guidelines for LGL syndrome. Based on the clinical description, management would focus on:

  • Treatment of paroxysmal tachycardia episodes when symptomatic 2
  • Management of autonomic dystonia 2

Common Pitfalls

Critical mistake: Administering AV nodal blockers (digoxin, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers) in WPW with AF can be fatal. 3 These agents block the AV node, forcing conduction exclusively through the accessory pathway, potentially causing ventricular fibrillation and cardiac arrest 3

WPW can mimic other conditions on ECG: bundle branch block, ventricular hypertrophy, or ischemic heart disease, leading to misdiagnosis 7

Asymptomatic WPW carries risk: In approximately 50% of WPW cardiac arrest cases, sudden death is the first manifestation 3, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Duration of Cardiac WPW Ablation Procedure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Monitoring and Management of Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.