What is the sensitivity of angiographic techniques, such as Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA), Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA), and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA), for detecting vasospasm?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sensitivity of CT Angiography (CTA) for Detecting Vasospasm

CTA demonstrates a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 93% for detecting cerebral vasospasm, making it the preferred non-invasive imaging modality for this indication. 1

Performance Characteristics by Vessel Location

Proximal (Central) Vessels

  • CTA achieves highest accuracy in large proximal intracranial vessels with sensitivity ranging from 82-91% and specificity of 90-97% 1, 2, 3

  • Detection rates are particularly strong for:

    • Middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 segments
    • Suprasellar internal carotid artery (ICA)
    • Basilar artery
    • Anterior cerebral artery (ACA) A1 segments 4
  • CTA shows excellent performance for severe vasospasm (>50% luminal reduction) with 100% accuracy in proximal locations 4

  • For absent vasospasm, CTA demonstrates 96% accuracy in proximal vessels 4

Distal (Peripheral) Vessels

  • Accuracy diminishes significantly in distal vascular territories 1
  • CTA correlation with conventional angiography decreases for smaller, more distal arteries 1
  • Detection of M2 segments and A2 segments shows lower correlation (0.152-0.446) compared to proximal vessels (0.88-1.00) 4

Severity Grading Performance

CTA demonstrates variable accuracy depending on vasospasm severity:

  • Severe spasm (>50% reduction): 100% accuracy 4
  • No spasm: 92% agreement with DSA 4
  • Moderate spasm (30-50% reduction): 64% agreement 4
  • Mild spasm (<30% reduction): 57% agreement 4

This pattern indicates CTA is most reliable for ruling in severe vasospasm or ruling out vasospasm entirely, but less dependable for intermediate grades 4

Comparison with Other Modalities

CTA vs. Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA)

  • DSA remains the gold standard with 100% sensitivity 1
  • CTA approaches DSA accuracy for proximal vessels but cannot replace it for definitive diagnosis of distal vasospasm 1
  • CTA has twice the spatial resolution of MRA but only half that of DSA 1

CTA vs. Transcranial Doppler (TCD)

  • TCD shows lower sensitivity (38%) and specificity (91%) compared to CTA 3
  • TCD achieves sensitivities of 70-90% for MCA vasospasm specifically, but performance drops in posterior circulation 1
  • CTA demonstrates superior positive likelihood ratio (27.3) compared to TCD for ruling in vasospasm 3

CTA vs. MRA

  • MRA is not recommended for vasospasm detection due to limitations from background hemorrhage and hemodynamic flow alterations 1
  • No relevant literature supports MRA use in suspected cerebral vasospasm 1

Clinical Application and Limitations

Optimal Use Cases

  • CTA combined with CT perfusion achieves 93% accuracy for vasospasm diagnosis 5
  • CTA is particularly useful when TCD readings become elevated and neurological examination is limited 1
  • CTA has 90% diagnostic accuracy and only 5% false-positive rate when symptoms develop 1

Important Caveats

  • Heavy atheromatous calcifications can produce blooming artifacts that may lead to false-positive results for stenosis 1
  • Metal artifacts from coils or clips can obscure adjacent arterial segments, and a negative CTA should not prevent further investigation in these areas 2
  • CTA provides static images and cannot assess flow rates, direction, or collateral circulation as effectively as DSA 1

Treatment Decision-Making

  • CTA is helpful for determining need for balloon angioplasty with significant predictive value 2
  • CT perfusion-derived mean transit time (MTT) ≥6.4 seconds combined with qualitative CTA assessment represents the most accurate combination (93%) for vasospasm diagnosis 5
  • Regional cerebral blood flow ≤39.3 mL×100g⁻¹×min⁻¹ on CT perfusion is the most accurate indicator (94.8%) for selecting patients requiring endovascular therapy 5

Guideline Recommendations

The 2023 AHA/ASA guidelines give CTA a Class 2a recommendation (Level B-NR evidence) for detecting vasospasm and predicting delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage 1

The 2021 ACR Appropriateness Criteria support CTA as providing less invasive evaluation compared to catheter angiography, with the caveat that correlation decreases in smaller distal arteries 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.