Switching from Lo Loestrin: Next Contraceptive Pill Option
For a patient not tolerating Lo Loestrin (norethindrone acetate 1mg/ethinyl estradiol 10mcg), the next best option is to increase the ethinyl estradiol dose to 20-35 mcg while maintaining a similar progestin, such as norethindrone acetate 1mg/ethinyl estradiol 20mcg or switching to a monophasic pill containing 30-35 mcg ethinyl estradiol with levonorgestrel or norgestimate. 1
Rationale for Dose Escalation
Lo Loestrin contains an ultra-low dose of ethinyl estradiol (10 mcg), which is at the lower threshold for reliable ovulation suppression. The evidence demonstrates that:
- 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol formulations show more follicular activity when pills are missed compared to 30 mcg formulations, requiring strict adherence for reliable contraceptive efficacy 2, 1
- Seven consecutive days of pill-taking is necessary to reliably prevent ovulation with 20 mcg formulations 2, 1
- Studies comparing different ethinyl estradiol doses found significantly greater suppression of ovulation with higher doses 2
Recommended Next Steps
First-Line Option: Increase Ethinyl Estradiol to 20-30 mcg
Switch to norethindrone acetate 1mg/ethinyl estradiol 20mcg (standard Loestrin formulation), which maintains the same progestin but provides double the estrogen dose 3. This formulation:
- Demonstrated effective contraception with 0.9% cumulative pregnancy risk over six cycles 3
- Was well-tolerated with generally mild to moderate side effects 3
- Provides better cycle control than ultra-low dose formulations 3
Alternative Option: Standard-Dose Monophasic COC
If intolerance persists or you prefer a different approach, switch to a monophasic pill containing 30-35 mcg ethinyl estradiol with levonorgestrel or norgestimate 1. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends these as first-line options due to:
- Established safety profile and effectiveness 1
- Second-generation progestins (like levonorgestrel) demonstrate a safer coagulation profile compared to newer progestins 1
- Lower thrombotic risk compared to third and fourth-generation progestins 1
Important Considerations
Why Not Stay at 10 mcg?
Ultra-low dose formulations (10 mcg ethinyl estradiol) have narrower margins for error:
- More susceptible to breakthrough ovulation with missed pills 2
- May have less favorable cycle control 3
- Require perfect adherence for reliable contraception 1
Safety Profile of Dose Increase
Increasing from 10 mcg to 20-30 mcg ethinyl estradiol remains within the low-dose range and maintains favorable safety:
- COCs containing 35 mcg or more ethinyl estradiol show statistically higher odds ratios for venous thromboembolism than lower doses 1
- The increase from 10 to 20-30 mcg provides better ovulation suppression while maintaining low thrombotic risk 1
- Most serious adverse event (blood clots) increases from 1 per 10,000 to 3-4 per 10,000 woman-years with COC use, still significantly lower than pregnancy risk (10-20 per 10,000) 1
Specific Formulation Recommendations
Among low-dose pills, there are no clear data suggesting one formulation is superior to another for most users, so the lowest copay option on the patient's insurance formulary is often appropriate 1. However:
- Norethindrone acetate formulations demonstrate minimal androgenic activity due to increases in sex hormone-binding globulin and decreases in free testosterone 4
- Second-generation progestins (levonorgestrel, norgestrel) have safer coagulation profiles 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not switch to progestin-only pills without understanding the patient's specific intolerance - if the issue is inadequate cycle control or breakthrough bleeding, progestin-only pills may worsen these symptoms 2
- Avoid formulations with drospirenone if the patient has hypertension or kidney disease - though drospirenone has anti-mineralocorticoid effects, it carries different risk profiles 1, 5
- Do not assume all intolerances require abandoning combined oral contraceptives - many side effects resolve with dose adjustment 1
Initiation Protocol
When switching from Lo Loestrin to the new formulation: