Triple A Screening
Men aged 65-75 who have ever smoked (≥100 cigarettes lifetime) should receive one-time ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm, as this reduces AAA-specific mortality by approximately 50%. 1, 2
Clarification: "Triple A" Refers to AAA Screening Only
The term "Triple A screening" refers specifically to Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) screening—not a combined screening for three separate cardiovascular conditions. 1 The evidence provided addresses only AAA screening protocols.
Primary Screening Recommendations by Population
Men Ages 65-75 Who Have Ever Smoked
- Definitive recommendation: One-time ultrasound screening is strongly recommended (Grade B). 1, 2
- Mortality benefit: Screening with appropriate treatment reduces AAA-specific mortality by approximately 43-50%. 1, 2
- Rationale: This population has AAA prevalence of 9.1-22%, making screening highly cost-effective. 1
Men Ages 65-75 Who Have Never Smoked
- Selective screening: Clinicians may offer screening on an individual basis rather than routinely (Grade C). 1, 2
- Lower prevalence: AAA is significantly less common in nonsmoking men, reducing the benefit-to-harm ratio. 1
Women Ages 65-75 Who Have Ever Smoked or Have Family History
- Insufficient evidence: Cannot make a recommendation for or against screening (I statement). 1, 2
- Important caveat: Women have one-sixth the prevalence of AAA compared to men, and the single trial studying women lacked adequate power. 1
Women Who Have Never Smoked
- Do not screen: Routine screening is not recommended (Grade D). 1, 2
- Rationale: AAA is extremely rare in this population, making screening unlikely to provide benefit. 1
Screening Methodology
Ultrasound as the Gold Standard
- Test characteristics: Sensitivity 95%, specificity approaching 100%. 1
- Quality assurance requirement: Ultrasonography must be performed in an accredited facility with credentialed technologists. 2
- Screening adequacy: One-time screening is sufficient; rescreening those with normal initial results provides negligible benefit. 1
- Incidence of new AAAs: After negative screening at age 65, the 10-year incidence of new AAAs is only 0-4%, with none exceeding 4.0 cm. 1
Alternative Imaging Modalities
- Noncontrast CT: Can be considered, especially in obese patients with poor ultrasound windows, with sensitivity 83-89% vs ultrasound 57-70%. 1
- Physical examination alone: Inadequate for screening; detects only 50% of AAAs overall, though may detect most in thin patients (abdominal girth <100 cm). 3
Management Based on Screening Results
Small AAAs (3.0-3.9 cm)
- Surveillance recommended: Periodic ultrasound monitoring without immediate intervention. 1
Intermediate AAAs (4.0-5.4 cm)
- Surveillance preferred over immediate surgery: Two randomized trials showed no mortality benefit from immediate repair compared to surveillance, with 39% fewer operations needed in the surveillance group. 1
Large AAAs (≥5.5 cm in men, ≥5.0 cm in women)
- Surgical intervention indicated: Either open repair or endovascular repair (EVAR). 1
- Open surgical mortality: 4-5% perioperative mortality with approximately one-third experiencing significant complications. 1
- EVAR short-term advantage: Lower 30-day mortality (~1.5% vs 4.5% for open repair), though long-term durability concerns exist with 1% annual rupture rate and 2% annual conversion to open repair. 1
Additional Risk Factors to Consider
High-Risk Populations Beyond Standard Guidelines
- Family history: First-degree relatives of AAA patients aged ≥50 years warrant screening consideration. 2
- Cardiovascular disease: Patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral artery disease have higher prevalence (4.3-6.8%). 4
- Expanded criteria consideration: The Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines include additional criteria that would identify more patients, particularly smokers under age 65 and elderly patients over 70 with no smoking history. 5
Common Pitfalls
- Missing younger smokers: Patients under 65 with heavy smoking history who develop AAA are twice as likely to present with rupture (8.5% vs 4.4%). 5
- Ignoring family history: This important risk factor may warrant screening outside standard age/smoking criteria. 2
- Assuming physical exam suffices: Abdominal palpation misses approximately 50% of AAAs and requires specific technique directed at AAA detection. 3
- Screening women inappropriately: Current evidence does not support routine screening in women, though Ontario data suggest this may need reevaluation. 6