What is the recommended treatment for elevated lactoferrin levels and ongoing digestive issues despite clear colonoscopy, endoscopy, and capsule endoscopy results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Elevated Lactoferrin with Clear Endoscopy: Diagnostic and Management Approach

Your lactoferrin level of 11.5 μg/g is elevated (normal <7.25 μg/g), and despite negative endoscopic evaluations, this warrants further investigation rather than empiric treatment, with repeat biomarker testing in 3-6 months being the most appropriate next step. 1, 2

Understanding Your Elevated Lactoferrin

Your fecal lactoferrin of 11.5 μg/g exceeds the diagnostic threshold of 7.25 μg/g used to detect intestinal inflammation. 1 However, the clinical significance must be interpreted in context:

  • Lactoferrin has 83% sensitivity and 75% specificity for detecting moderate to severe endoscopic inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). 2 This means approximately 25% of elevated results may not reflect true endoscopic inflammation, which appears consistent with your negative endoscopic findings.

  • The modest elevation (11.5 vs. threshold of 7.25) suggests either mild inflammation below endoscopic detection thresholds, segmental disease that was missed, or a false positive result. 2

Why Your Endoscopies Were Clear

Several important considerations explain the discordance between your elevated lactoferrin and negative endoscopic findings:

  • Capsule endoscopy, colonoscopy, and upper endoscopy can miss subtle mucosal inflammation, particularly in the small bowel or when inflammation is microscopic rather than macroscopic. 1

  • Fecal biomarkers can detect inflammation at a molecular level before it becomes visually apparent on endoscopy. 3

  • Your lactoferrin elevation is relatively modest, suggesting if inflammation exists, it may be mild (below the Mayo Endoscopic Score 2-3 threshold used in most studies). 1

Recommended Management Strategy

Immediate Steps:

Rule out infectious causes first - even with negative initial workup, ensure comprehensive stool testing for:

  • Clostridioides difficile (C. diff)
  • Enteric bacterial pathogens
  • Parasitic infections 2, 4

Primary Recommendation:

Repeat fecal lactoferrin measurement in 3-6 months rather than proceeding to empiric treatment or repeat endoscopy. 1, 2 This approach is specifically recommended by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) for patients with:

  • Mild or absent symptoms
  • Elevated biomarkers
  • No endoscopic confirmation of inflammation 1

If Lactoferrin Remains Elevated on Repeat Testing:

Proceed with repeat endoscopic assessment, potentially with biopsies from previously normal-appearing areas. 1, 2 The rationale:

  • Persistent elevation increases likelihood of true inflammation 1
  • Histologic examination may reveal microscopic inflammation missed on visual inspection 1
  • This establishes whether lactoferrin correlates with your specific disease pattern 2

If Symptoms Worsen Before Repeat Testing:

Immediate endoscopic reassessment is warranted if you develop:

  • Frequent rectal bleeding
  • Significant increase in stool frequency (≥4 bowel movements above baseline)
  • Abdominal pain with fever or tenderness 1

Important Considerations About Your Case

Factors That Can Elevate Lactoferrin Without IBD:

  • Recent NSAID use (within 6 weeks) - you've confirmed avoidance, which is appropriate 2
  • Alcohol consumption - you've confirmed avoidance, which is appropriate 2
  • Subclinical infections not detected on routine testing 2, 4
  • Microscopic colitis - requires histologic diagnosis, not visible endoscopically 1

Why Empiric Treatment Is Not Recommended:

The AGA specifically advises against empiric treatment in patients with elevated biomarkers but no endoscopic confirmation of inflammation. 1 The reasoning:

  • Risk of unnecessary immunosuppression and treatment-related complications 1
  • False positive rate of 12.5% for elevated lactoferrin in intermediate probability scenarios 1
  • Need to establish definitive diagnosis before committing to long-term therapy 1

Monitoring Strategy Going Forward

If repeat lactoferrin normalizes (<7.25 μg/g):

  • Continue monitoring symptoms
  • No further biomarker testing needed unless symptoms develop 1

If repeat lactoferrin remains elevated and endoscopy confirms inflammation:

  • Treatment should be adjusted based on endoscopic findings 2
  • Monitor both lactoferrin and fecal calprotectin going forward to determine which correlates better with your disease activity 2
  • Repeat biomarkers 2-4 months after treatment initiation 4

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

Do not dismiss ongoing digestive symptoms simply because endoscopy was clear. 1 The combination of symptoms plus elevated lactoferrin warrants continued investigation, as:

  • Functional disorders (like IBS) should have normal lactoferrin (<7.25 μg/g) 3
  • Your elevated level suggests organic pathology even if not yet endoscopically visible 3
  • Early detection and treatment of IBD improves long-term outcomes 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Considerations for Discordant Fecal Biomarkers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Elevated Fecal Calprotectin

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.