Who is a candidate for a Thoracolumbar Sacral Orthosis (TLSO) brace?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

TLSO Brace Candidacy for Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries

TLSO braces are indicated for neurologically intact patients with stable thoracolumbar burst fractures (T11-L3), though bracing is optional as outcomes are equivalent to no bracing, making the decision physician-dependent based on patient preference and clinical judgment. 1

Primary Indications

Stable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

  • Neurologically intact patients with AO Type A3 burst fractures between T11-L3 are the classic candidates for TLSO consideration 1, 2
  • Fractures must demonstrate intact posterior ligamentous complex (no posterior column disruption) 3
  • Initial kyphotic deformity should be less than 35 degrees 2
  • Patients should be skeletally mature and under 60 years of age 2
  • Admission within 72 hours of injury is typical for conservative management protocols 2

Key Clinical Decision Point

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons provides a Grade B recommendation that management with or without external bracing produces equivalent outcomes—the decision is at the treating physician's discretion. 1, 4

Evidence Against Routine Bracing

Equivalent Outcomes Demonstrated

  • Level I randomized controlled trial evidence shows no difference in pain, disability, or radiographic outcomes between braced and non-braced patients at 6 months 1, 5
  • Meta-analysis confirms no significant differences in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire scores, Oswestry Disability Index, SF-36 scores, pain levels, or kyphotic progression at both short-term and long-term (≥5 years) follow-up 6
  • Hospital length of stay is significantly shorter in non-braced patients (mean 2.8 days vs 6.3 days with TLSO) 5

Fracture Stability Rationale

  • Thoracolumbar burst fractures without posterior ligamentous complex injury are inherently stable and may not require external support 2
  • CT follow-up demonstrates significant resorption of retropulsed bone occurs naturally without bracing 3

When TLSO Is Reasonable to Use

Patient-Specific Factors Favoring Bracing

  • Patient anxiety or preference for external support during healing 1
  • Concerns about maintaining spinal precautions without external reminder
  • Concomitant lower extremity fractures that may complicate early mobilization (though these patients still achieve independent ambulation, just requiring more physical therapy sessions) 7
  • Occupational demands requiring earlier return to modified activities

Bracing Protocol When Used

  • Custom-molded TLSO typically arrives within 2 days of admission 7
  • Patients begin weaning at 8 weeks over a 2-week period 2
  • Early mobilization is encouraged even with brace, maintaining neutral spinal alignment 2
  • Most patients achieve independent ambulation after 1-2 physical therapy sessions 7

Absolute Contraindications to Conservative Management (Requiring Surgery, Not TLSO)

Unstable Fracture Patterns

  • Significant vertebral collapse, angulation, or canal compromise 1
  • Any neurological deficit present 1, 2
  • Posterior ligamentous complex disruption (posterior column injury) 3
  • Fractures with TLICS score >4 suggesting instability 1
  • Evidence of shear, rotation, or translational injury components 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume bracing is mandatory—high-quality evidence supports early mobilization without orthosis as equally effective 1, 6
  • Do not prolong hospitalization solely for brace fitting—non-braced patients have shorter stays without worse outcomes 5
  • Do not order TLSO for patients with neurological deficits—these require surgical evaluation 1
  • Do not use bracing as substitute for proper patient selection—ensure posterior column integrity before any conservative approach 3

Practical Implementation

For Non-Braced Approach

  • Educate patients on neutral spinal alignment maintenance for 8 weeks 2
  • Initiate physical therapy within 4 days of admission 7
  • Most patients discharge home the same day they clear PT for independent ambulation 7
  • Follow-up radiographs at 6 weeks and cessation of activity restrictions 8

Treatment Failure Recognition

  • Failure rates are low and similar between braced (3/59) and non-braced (1/60) groups 2
  • Monitor for progressive kyphosis or persistent pain beyond 6 weeks requiring advanced imaging 8

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.