What is the treatment for enteric fever?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Enteric Fever

For uncomplicated enteric fever, azithromycin 20 mg/kg/day (maximum 1g/day) orally for 7 days is the preferred first-line treatment, particularly in regions with high fluoroquinolone resistance, while ceftriaxone 50-80 mg/kg/day (maximum 2g/day) IV for 5-7 days should be used for severe cases requiring hospitalization. 1, 2

First-Line Treatment Selection

For Outpatient/Uncomplicated Cases

  • Azithromycin is superior to fluoroquinolones, demonstrating lower clinical failure rates (OR 0.48,95% CI 0.26-0.89), shorter hospital stays (-1.04 days), and dramatically lower relapse rates (OR 0.09,95% CI 0.01-0.70) compared to ceftriaxone 3, 1
  • Azithromycin achieves a 94% cure rate in children with typhoid fever 1
  • Dosing: 20 mg/kg/day (maximum 1g/day) orally for 7 days 1, 2, 4

For Hospitalized/Severe Cases

  • Ceftriaxone is the preferred parenteral agent, particularly given that over 70% of S. typhi isolates globally now demonstrate fluoroquinolone resistance 2, 4, 5
  • Dosing: 50-80 mg/kg/day (maximum 2g/day) IV for 5-7 days initially 1, 2
  • All organisms remained susceptible to ceftriaxone throughout 2005-2014 in major studies, while fluoroquinolone MICs rose significantly 6
  • Switch to oral therapy (azithromycin or cefixime) once temperature normalizes for 24 hours and clinical improvement occurs 2, 4

Alternative Oral Options

Cefixime

  • Dosing: 8 mg/kg/day as single daily dose for 7-14 days 1
  • Cefixime performs less well than fluoroquinolones when organisms are susceptible, with increased clinical failure (RR 13.39,95% CI 3.24-55.39), microbiological failure (RR 4.07), and relapse rates (RR 4.45) 7
  • Fever clearance is 1.74 days longer compared to fluoroquinolones 7
  • Consider as step-down therapy after initial parenteral treatment rather than primary therapy 1

Treatment Based on Resistance Patterns

Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible Strains (Rare)

  • Ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin may be used only if documented susceptibility exists 3
  • Critical caveat: Over 70% of isolates from South Asia are fluoroquinolone-resistant; avoid empiric use for cases from this region 2, 4, 5
  • Fluoroquinolone resistance is a class effect and increasing globally 1, 6

Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Strains

  • Fluoroquinolones historically recommended, but resistance now precludes this approach 3, 7
  • Use ceftriaxone or azithromycin instead 3, 4

Extensively Drug-Resistant (XDR) Strains

  • Emerging from Pakistan since 2016 with limited treatment options 5, 8
  • Azithromycin and carbapenems may be only effective options 5, 8

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

  • Standard duration: 7 days for uncomplicated cases with azithromycin or oral cephalosporins 1, 4
  • Extended duration: Consider 14 days to reduce relapse risk, particularly with ceftriaxone 4
  • Expected fever clearance: 4-5 days with appropriate therapy 1
  • Relapse rates: <3% with azithromycin, <8% with ceftriaxone, higher with fluoroquinolones 4

Diagnostic Considerations Before Treatment

  • Obtain blood cultures before starting antibiotics whenever possible, as they have highest yield in first week of symptoms 2, 4
  • For patients with sepsis features, start broad-spectrum therapy immediately after blood culture collection 2, 4
  • Stool and urine cultures become positive after first week but have lower sensitivity 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Do not use fluoroquinolones empirically for cases from South Asia or other high-resistance areas 2, 4, 5
  2. Do not rely on older antibiotics (chloramphenicol, ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) as they show higher clinical failure rates than fluoroquinolones, which themselves are now largely ineffective 3
  3. Do not use cefixime as first-line monotherapy when azithromycin or ceftriaxone are available, given inferior outcomes 7
  4. Do not discontinue antibiotics prematurely before symptom resolution to prevent relapse 2
  5. Do not ignore local resistance patterns, which vary geographically and change over time 1, 2, 7

Special Clinical Scenarios

Non-Response to Initial Therapy

  • Approximately 10% of patients show clinical non-response despite in vitro susceptibility 9
  • Consider switching antibiotic class or adding combination therapy 9
  • Evaluate for complications (perforation, bleeding, abscess formation) if fever persists beyond 5 days 2

Complications Requiring Monitoring

  • Gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation, and typhoid encephalopathy occur in 10-15% of patients 4
  • More likely if illness duration exceeds 2 weeks before treatment 4
  • Consider CT imaging for persistent peritoneal signs or failure of bowel function to normalize 2

References

Guideline

Treatment of Enteric Fever in Children

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment of Enteric Fever in Inpatient Setting

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Enteric Fever

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Treatment of enteric fever (typhoid and paratyphoid fever) with cephalosporins.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2022

Research

Salmonellosis Including Enteric Fever.

Pediatric clinics of North America, 2022

Research

Current antibiotic use in the treatment of enteric fever in children.

The Indian journal of medical research, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.