Initial Imaging for Suspected Scaphoid Fracture
Order standard wrist radiographs including a dedicated "scaphoid view" (anteroposterior, lateral, oblique, and scaphoid-specific views) as your first-line imaging study. 1, 2
Initial Radiographic Evaluation
- Begin with a four-view radiographic series: anteroposterior, lateral, oblique, and scaphoid view (Stecher's view with the wrist in ulnar deviation) 1, 3
- The dedicated scaphoid view may reveal fractures that are otherwise occult on standard wrist radiographs 1
- Standard radiography detects approximately 70% of scaphoid fractures, meaning up to 30% are initially missed 4
When Initial Radiographs Are Negative But Clinical Suspicion Remains High
If the patient has a positive Kanawel sign (anatomic snuffbox tenderness) or other concerning clinical findings with negative initial radiographs, proceed directly to MRI without IV contrast rather than presumptive casting and repeat radiographs. 1
Clinical Decision-Making Tool
- Consider using a Clinical Scaphoid Score (CSS) to guide advanced imaging decisions 5:
- Anatomic snuffbox tenderness with wrist in ulnar deviation: 3 points
- Scaphoid tubercle tenderness: 2 points
- Pain with longitudinal thumb compression: 1 point
- If CSS ≥4 points (snuffbox pain plus at least one other finding), proceed directly to MRI 5
- A CSS <4 has a 96% negative predictive value, making scaphoid fracture unlikely 5
Advanced Imaging Options (When Initial X-rays Are Negative)
MRI Without IV Contrast (Preferred)
- MRI is the preferred advanced imaging modality with sensitivity of 94.2% and specificity of 97.7% for detecting occult scaphoid fractures 1, 2
- MRI detects bone marrow edema, bone bruises, and concomitant ligament injuries that may affect treatment 1
- No radiation exposure 1
- Common pitfall: MRI can sometimes struggle to differentiate bone contusion from non-displaced fracture 4
CT Without IV Contrast (Alternative)
- Use CT if MRI is contraindicated or unavailable 1
- CT provides superior anatomic detail of bone cortex, trabeculae, and fracture morphology (localization, fragment displacement, comminution) 4
- Sensitivity of 85-95% and specificity of 95-100% 4
- Shorter acquisition time and easier to perform in casted patients 1
- CT is particularly useful for evaluating the hook of the hamate 1
Bone Scan (Less Preferred Alternative)
- High sensitivity but lower specificity compared to CT and MRI 1, 6
- May be reasonable for claustrophobic patients who cannot tolerate MRI 1
- Becomes positive 1-2 weeks before radiographic changes are visible 6
The Traditional "Wait and Repeat" Approach (Generally Not Recommended)
- If advanced imaging is unavailable, immobilize in a thumb spica cast and repeat radiographs in 10-14 days 6
- Critical pitfall: Repeating radiographs too early (less than 10 days) has high risk of missing fractures that remain occult 6
- This approach results in unnecessary immobilization in 76-94% of patients who don't have fractures, leading to lost productivity 7
- The American College of Radiology now recommends proceeding directly to MRI rather than this traditional approach 1