Workup for Suspected Malignancy
The workup for suspected malignancy should begin with location-specific imaging (ultrasound for abdominal/pelvic masses, plain radiographs for bone lesions, chest CT for pulmonary lesions) followed by cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI), appropriate laboratory studies including tumor markers, and tissue diagnosis via core needle or excisional biopsy when indicated. 1, 2
Initial Assessment by Location
Abdominal/Pelvic Mass
- Ultrasound is the first-line imaging modality to determine if the mass is solid or cystic and assess vascularity 1
- CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast should follow for suspected malignancy or indeterminate ultrasound findings, providing detailed characterization and assessment for metastasis 1
- For pelvic/adnexal masses specifically, transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound with Doppler is preferred initially 1
- MRI pelvis without and with IV contrast is superior for characterizing complex adnexal masses when ultrasound is indeterminate 1
Bone Lesions
- Plain radiographs are the initial study when a bone tumor is suspected 2
- In patients under 40 years with an aggressive, painful bone lesion, refer to an orthopedic oncologist before further workup due to high risk of primary bone malignancy 2
- In patients ≥40 years, if radiographs don't suggest a specific diagnosis, obtain chest/abdomen/pelvis CT, bone scan, mammogram, and other imaging as clinically indicated 2
- Complete staging before biopsy includes chest imaging (chest radiograph or CT), MRI for local staging, CT of primary site, and bone scan 2
Bladder/Urothelial Lesions
- Cystoscopy with transurethral resection (TURBT) is the initial diagnostic and staging procedure 2
- Examination under anesthesia (EUA) should be performed 2
- CT or MRI of abdomen/pelvis to assess local and regional extent, though these cannot accurately predict depth of invasion 2
- Chest imaging (radiograph or CT) to detect metastases 2
- Bone scan only in patients with symptoms or elevated alkaline phosphatase 2
Hepatic Lesions
- Multiphasic CT or MRI showing classic enhancement pattern is more definitive than AFP alone for HCC diagnosis 2
- If rising AFP without visible mass, additional imaging (CT or MRI) is recommended 2
- Biopsy may be considered when lesion is suspicious but imaging doesn't meet HCC criteria 2
Laboratory Studies
General Malignancy Workup
- Complete blood count (CBC) to assess for anemia, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, or thrombocytopenia 2, 3, 4
- Comprehensive metabolic panel including liver function tests (bilirubin, AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase), renal function (BUN, creatinine), and albumin 2, 3
- Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) - elevated in various malignancies including bone tumors, lymphomas, and germ cell tumors 2, 3
Location-Specific Tumor Markers
For Pelvic/Adnexal Masses:
- CA-125 is recommended as part of initial evaluation to differentiate benign from malignant processes 3
- Age-specific markers for patients <35 years: AFP and hCG to assess for germ cell tumors and rule out pregnancy 3
- Inhibin if granulosa cell tumor suspected 3
- CEA for suspected mucinous histology, with gastrointestinal tract evaluation to distinguish primary ovarian from metastatic disease 3
For Hepatobiliary Malignancy:
- AFP testing useful in conjunction with imaging, though can be elevated in pregnancy and other cancers (cholangiocarcinoma, colon metastases, lymphoma, germ cell tumors) 2
- Hepatitis panel: HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antibody, HBcAb, HBcAb IgM (if acute hepatitis), HCV antibodies 2
- Confirm viral load if positive for HBsAg, HBcAb IgG, or HCV antibodies 2
For Bone Tumors:
- Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) - commonly elevated in bone malignancies 2
Lymphoma-Specific Workup
- LDH and β2-microglobulin for prognostication 2
- HIV and hepatitis B/C screening 2
- Immunophenotyping of peripheral blood and bone marrow is not routinely recommended 2
Tissue Diagnosis
Biopsy Principles
- Image-guided core needle biopsy is preferred for suspicious solid masses 1
- Excisional lymph node biopsy or core biopsy should be performed for lymphoma diagnosis; fine-needle aspiration is insufficient 2
- For bone lesions, the biopsy tract must be planned to lie within the planned resection bed so it can be resected with wide margins during definitive surgery 2
- Fine-needle aspiration should be avoided for suspected ovarian masses to prevent spillage of malignant cells 1
- For bone tumors, appropriate communication between surgeon, musculoskeletal oncologist, and bone pathologist is critical in planning biopsy route 2
Common Pitfall
Do not perform fine-needle aspiration for primary bone lesions - diagnostic accuracy is less than core needle or open biopsy, though it doesn't carry significant risk of tumor seeding 2
Staging and Metastatic Evaluation
Chest Imaging
- Chest radiograph or chest CT to detect pulmonary metastases is standard for most malignancies 2
Bone Scan
- Indicated for patients with bone pain, elevated alkaline phosphatase, or clinical suspicion of bone metastasis 2
- Not routinely needed in asymptomatic patients without these findings 2
Advanced Imaging
- Whole-body MRI is sensitive for detecting skeletal metastases in small cell neoplasms, Ewing sarcoma, and osteosarcoma 2
- PET or PET/CT useful for evaluating chemotherapy response in osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and advanced chordoma 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely solely on CA-125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis - it can be elevated in benign conditions and may not be elevated in early-stage disease 3
- Do not skip age-appropriate tumor markers in young patients - missing AFP/hCG in patients <35 can lead to missed germ cell tumor diagnoses 3
- Do not perform biopsy before complete staging in bone sarcomas - staging must be completed first 2
- Do not assume negative biopsy rules out malignancy in a growing mass - continual monitoring with multidisciplinary review is essential 2
- For mucinous pelvic masses, always evaluate the gastrointestinal tract to avoid misdiagnosing metastatic disease as primary ovarian cancer 3