Diagnosis and Management of Fatty Tissue Near the Xiphoid Process
Initial Diagnostic Approach
If fatty tissue is palpable near the xiphoid process, begin with plain radiographs to identify bone involvement or calcifications, followed by ultrasound to characterize the soft tissue mass. 1
Radiographic Evaluation
- Plain radiographs should be obtained first to identify bone involvement, calcifications, or intrinsic fat characteristics, as recommended by the American College of Radiology 1, 2
- Radiographs can demonstrate positive findings in 62% of soft tissue masses and help distinguish xiphoid process anatomical variations from true pathology 2
- The xiphoid process itself shows significant anatomical variations and can be bifid, trifid, curved, or deflected, which may be mistaken for masses 3
Ultrasound Characterization
- Ultrasound is the primary triage tool after radiographs, with sensitivity of 94.1% and specificity of 99.7% for evaluating superficial soft tissue masses 1, 4, 2
- Classic ultrasound features of a lipoma include an avascular, ovoid mass that is isoechoic with surrounding fat 4
- When ultrasound features are typical (well-circumscribed, hyperechoic, minimal vascularity), further imaging is generally unnecessary 4
Advanced Imaging
- MRI without IV contrast may be appropriate if ultrasound is non-diagnostic or if soft tissue pathology is suspected 1
- MRI is not routinely needed for typical lipomas but should be considered for atypical features or deep-seated masses 2
Management Based on Diagnosis
For Benign Lipomas
For small (<5 cm), asymptomatic lipomas with typical imaging features, observation is the appropriate management strategy. 4
- Observation is recommended for asymptomatic lesions with classic benign imaging characteristics 4
- Complete en bloc surgical excision is indicated when the lipoma is symptomatic, rapidly growing, large (>5 cm), or shows atypical features on imaging 4
For Xiphoid Process-Related Pain (Xiphodynia)
- Xiphodynia is diagnosed when chest or abdominal discomfort is completely or almost completely reproduced with light pressure on the xiphoid process 5
- Local injection with an anesthetic-steroid combination is frequently curative, using no more than 5-7 mL of solution 5
- Surgical excision of the xiphoid process may be necessary for persistent symptoms or "tack hammer deformity" 5, 6
For Xiphoid Process Abnormalities
- Post-surgical elongation or fracture of the xiphoid process should be managed with surgical resection to avoid tissue neogenesis and chronic symptoms 7
- Xiphoid syndrome from chronic occupational trauma responds to anti-inflammatory medication and avoidance of pressure on the anterior chest wall 8
Red Flags Requiring Further Evaluation
Consider referral or additional workup if any of the following are present:
- Rapid growth of the mass 4
- Development of pain in a previously asymptomatic lesion 4
- Size >5 cm 4
- Atypical features on imaging (irregular margins, increased vascularity, heterogeneous appearance) 4
- Concerning features on follow-up imaging 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not rely on physical examination alone, as it correctly identifies only about 85% of soft tissue tumors 2
- Do not confuse normal xiphoid process anatomical variations with pathology during ultrasound examination of the abdominal aorta or epigastric region 1, 3
- If fatty tissue alone is identified in the palpable region on mammography (in breast imaging context), ultrasound may not be necessary 9
- Avoid unnecessary biopsy of clearly benign lesions with typical imaging characteristics 9, 4