Alternative Calcium Channel Blockers to Diltiazem 120 mg
For patients requiring an alternative to diltiazem 120 mg, verapamil is the most appropriate substitute as it shares similar non-dihydropyridine properties with comparable effects on heart rate, AV conduction, and blood pressure control, while amlodipine serves as the preferred dihydropyridine alternative when rate control is not needed. 1, 2
Non-Dihydropyridine Alternative: Verapamil
Verapamil is the direct pharmacologic equivalent to diltiazem as both are non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with similar mechanisms of action 1:
- Verapamil shares diltiazem's negative chronotropic and dromotropic effects, making it suitable when heart rate control is desired 1
- Both agents have pronounced effects on myocardial contractility and cardiac pacemaker/AV conduction cells, unlike dihydropyridines 1
- Typical verapamil dosing ranges from 120-360 mg daily (similar to diltiazem's range), with initial doses of 120-180 mg once daily for extended-release formulations 1, 3
- Like diltiazem, verapamil has minimal negative inotropic effects in patients with normal ventricular function 4
Key Differences Between Verapamil and Diltiazem
- Verapamil causes more constipation, especially in elderly patients, due to decreased intestinal motility 1
- Both have similarly low rates of peripheral edema compared to dihydropyridines 2
- Both are metabolized by CYP3A4 and should not be combined with ivabradine due to severe bradycardia risk 1
Dihydropyridine Alternative: Amlodipine
When rate control is not required and pure vasodilation is the goal, amlodipine is the preferred alternative 2, 5:
- Amlodipine provides superior blood pressure reduction compared to diltiazem in head-to-head trials, with greater reductions in both systolic and diastolic pressures 5
- In one comparative study, amlodipine reduced sitting systolic pressure by 14 mm Hg versus 3.9 mm Hg with diltiazem, and sitting diastolic by 12.4 mm Hg versus 9.2 mm Hg 5
- Amlodipine has high selectivity for vascular L-type calcium channels, producing coronary and systemic vasodilation without significant effects on heart rate or AV conduction 1
- Standard dosing is 5-10 mg once daily 6, 5
Important Caveats for Amlodipine
- Peripheral edema occurs significantly more frequently with amlodipine than with diltiazem or verapamil, particularly in women 1, 2
- Reflex tachycardia may occur, especially problematic in patients with angina or coronary disease 1
- Amlodipine is better tolerated in patients with mild left ventricular dysfunction compared to non-dihydropyridines 2
- Avoid in patients requiring rate control for atrial fibrillation or other tachyarrhythmias 1
Clinical Decision Algorithm
- Heart rate control is needed (e.g., atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia)
- Patient has normal ventricular function
- Peripheral edema is a concern
- Patient is not elderly or prone to constipation
Choose amlodipine when: 1, 2, 5
- Pure vasodilation is the goal (hypertension without rate control needs)
- Maximum blood pressure reduction is required
- Patient has mild left ventricular dysfunction
- Patient tolerates peripheral edema
- No concerns about reflex tachycardia
Contraindications Shared by All Non-Dihydropyridines
Both diltiazem and verapamil are contraindicated in: 2, 3
- Second or third-degree AV block without pacemaker
- Sick sinus syndrome without pacemaker
- Decompensated systolic heart failure or severe LV dysfunction
- Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome with atrial fibrillation/flutter
- Cardiogenic shock
- Hypotension
Monitoring Requirements
For verapamil (similar to diltiazem): 3
- Blood pressure and heart rate at each visit
- ECG monitoring in patients with conduction system disease
- Signs and symptoms of heart failure in at-risk patients
- Liver function tests if clinically indicated
For amlodipine: 1
- Blood pressure monitoring
- Assessment for peripheral edema
- Heart rate monitoring for reflex tachycardia