Exercise Stress Test Protocol for Patients at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease
For patients at intermediate risk (15-65% pre-test probability) who can exercise and have an interpretable baseline ECG, standard exercise ECG testing without imaging is the recommended initial diagnostic test. 1
Patient Selection for Standard Exercise ECG
Ideal Candidates (Class I Recommendation)
- Intermediate pre-test probability of CAD (15-65%) with anginal symptoms 1
- Ability to exercise adequately (achieve ≥85% maximum predicted heart rate) 1
- Normal or near-normal baseline ECG without ST-segment abnormalities 1, 2
- Not taking digoxin 1
- No prior coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) 1
Absolute Contraindications Requiring Imaging Instead
- Baseline ST-segment depression ≥0.1 mV (1 mm) 1
- Baseline ST-segment elevation 3
- Left bundle branch block (LBBB) 1
- Ventricular paced rhythm 1
- Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome 1
- Left ventricular hypertrophy with strain pattern 1
- Taking digoxin 1
When to Use Stress Imaging as Initial Test
High-Risk Scenarios (Class I for Imaging)
- Pre-test probability 66-85% 1
- Left ventricular ejection fraction <50% without typical angina 1
- Prior revascularization (PCI or CABG) 1
- Uninterpretable baseline ECG due to abnormalities listed above 1
Gender Considerations
- Women have lower sensitivity and specificity with standard exercise ECG 1
- However, a randomized trial showed no incremental benefit of nuclear imaging over standard treadmill testing for clinical outcomes in symptomatic women capable of exercise 1
- Stress echocardiography or nuclear imaging should be considered for women with intermediate-to-high pre-test probability and abnormal baseline ECG 1
Exercise Protocol Selection
Preferred Modality
- Exercise (treadmill or bicycle) is always preferred over pharmacologic stress when the patient can exercise 1
- Treadmill provides higher diagnostic sensitivity than bicycle ergometer 4
- Target duration: 8-12 minutes to maximal capacity 4
Common Protocols
- Bruce protocol is most widely used in North America 4
- Modified protocols with smaller workload increments are preferred for patients with limited exercise capacity or very high fitness levels to achieve the 8-12 minute target 4
Test Endpoints and Interpretation
Adequate Test Requirements
- Achievement of ≥85% maximum predicted heart rate in absence of symptoms or ischemic signs 1
- Maximum predicted heart rate = 220 - age 5
Key Diagnostic Parameters Beyond ECG Changes
- Exercise capacity (METs achieved) - most powerful predictor of risk 1
- Heart rate response and recovery 6
- Blood pressure response 1, 5
- Symptoms during exercise 1
- Workload achieved 1
Positive Test Criteria
- Horizontal or downsloping ST-segment depression ≥1 mm (0.1 mV) 1
- ST-segment elevation in non-Q wave leads 1
Risk Stratification After Testing
Low-Risk Patients (Conservative Management)
- Normal exercise ECG with good exercise capacity 1
- No further imaging required 1
- Medical therapy and risk factor modification 1
High-Risk Patients (Refer to Angiography)
- Significant ischemia at low workload 1
- Extensive ST-segment changes 1
- Hypotensive response to exercise 5
- Poor exercise capacity with ischemic changes 1
Intermediate/Uncertain Risk (Consider Imaging)
- Inconclusive test (failure to achieve 85% maximum heart rate without symptoms/signs) 1
- Equivocal ECG changes 1
- Borderline ST-segment depression (0.05-0.1 mV) 1
Special Populations
Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients
- Low-risk patients: test within 72 hours of presentation 1
- Intermediate-risk patients: test after 2-3 days of clinical stability (minimum 8-12 hours symptom-free) 1
- Submaximal test can be performed before hospital discharge 5
- Full symptom-limited test after 2-3 weeks post-MI 5
Asymptomatic Patients with Risk Factors
- Exercise stress testing may provide valuable prognostic information 5
- Not routinely recommended for screening but can guide risk stratification 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never perform standard exercise ECG in patients with baseline ST-segment abnormalities - this leads to uninterpretable results and requires imaging 1, 3
- Do not interpret a "normal" test in patients taking anti-ischemic medications as ruling out significant CAD 1
- Avoid testing patients with unstable symptoms - ensure clinical stability first 1
- Do not rely solely on ST-segment changes - incorporate exercise capacity, hemodynamic response, and symptoms into risk assessment 1, 6
- False-positive rates are higher in women, patients with LVH, electrolyte imbalances, and those on digoxin 1