What are the treatment options for ankylosing spondylitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Options for Ankylosing Spondylitis

Start with NSAIDs as first-line therapy for all patients with pain and stiffness, and escalate to TNF inhibitors if disease activity remains high despite adequate NSAID trials. 1

Initial Treatment Approach

Non-Pharmacological Foundation

  • Patient education and regular exercise must be initiated immediately upon diagnosis as these are cornerstone treatments that improve long-term outcomes 1, 2
  • Physical therapy should be incorporated, with group therapy showing superior patient global assessment outcomes compared to individual therapy alone 2
  • Individual and group physical therapy sessions should be considered based on patient preference and availability 1

First-Line Pharmacological Treatment: NSAIDs

NSAIDs are the recommended first-line drug treatment with Level Ib evidence demonstrating improvement in spinal pain, peripheral joint pain, and function over 6-week periods 1, 2

NSAID Selection Strategy:

  • For patients with standard gastrointestinal risk: Use any NSAID at maximum tolerated dose 1
  • For patients with increased GI risk: Use either non-selective NSAIDs plus gastroprotective agent (PPIs reduce serious GI events by 60%, RR 0.40) OR selective COX-2 inhibitors (which reduce serious GI events by 82% compared to non-selective NSAIDs, RR 0.18) 1
  • Continuous NSAID treatment is preferred over on-demand use for patients with persistently active, symptomatic disease, as continuous therapy may prevent new bone formation 1

Important NSAID Considerations:

  • Trial at least two different NSAIDs at maximum tolerated dose for at least 3 months each before declaring NSAID failure 2
  • Cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and renal risks must be assessed before prescribing 1
  • NSAIDs carry significant GI toxicity (RR 5.36 for serious GI events) and modest cardiovascular effects (RR 0.86) 1

Second-Line Options for Inadequate NSAID Response

Analgesics (paracetamol and opioids) may be added for pain control when NSAIDs are insufficient, contraindicated, or poorly tolerated 1, 3

Advanced Therapy: TNF Inhibitors

Anti-TNF treatment should be initiated in patients with persistently high disease activity (BASDAI >4) despite conventional treatments including at least two NSAIDs for at least 3 months 1, 2

TNF Inhibitor Selection:

  • No particular TNF inhibitor is preferred for axial disease alone 1, 3
  • For patients with concomitant inflammatory bowel disease: TNF monoclonal antibodies (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab) are strongly preferred over etanercept 1, 3
  • For patients with recurrent iritis: TNF monoclonal antibodies should be used 1

TNF Inhibitor Dosing (FDA-Approved):

  • Adalimumab (Humira): 40 mg subcutaneously every other week 4
  • Etanercept (Enbrel): 50 mg subcutaneously weekly 5

Duration and Monitoring of TNF Inhibitor Therapy:

  • Long-term treatment is recommended; discontinuation is not advised as 60-74% of patients relapse after stopping 3
  • Discontinuation might only be considered in patients with sustained remission for several years, with understanding that two-thirds will relapse 3
  • Dose tapering is not recommended as a standard approach 3
  • Regular monitoring of disease activity using validated measures (BASDAI, ASAS core set) is recommended 3

Switching Biologics:

  • For primary non-response to first TNF inhibitor: Switch to secukinumab or ixekizumab over switching to a different TNF inhibitor 3
  • For secondary non-response: Switch to a different TNF inhibitor over switching to a non-TNF biologic 3

Treatments with Limited or No Role

DMARDs for Axial Disease:

There is no evidence for efficacy of DMARDs (sulfasalazine, methotrexate) for axial disease 1

  • Sulfasalazine may be considered only for patients with peripheral arthritis 1, 6
  • DMARDs are not required before or during anti-TNF treatment for axial disease 1, 4
  • Co-treatment with low-dose methotrexate is not recommended for patients on TNF inhibitors 3

Corticosteroids:

  • Systemic corticosteroids for axial disease are not supported by evidence and should be avoided 1, 2
  • Corticosteroid injections directed to local sites of musculoskeletal inflammation (peripheral joints, entheses) may be considered 1, 2

Surgical Interventions

Total hip arthroplasty should be considered in patients with refractory pain or disability and radiographic evidence of structural damage, independent of age 1

Spinal surgery (corrective osteotomy, stabilization procedures) may be valuable in selected patients with severe deformities 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Inadequate NSAID trials: Must try at least two different NSAIDs at maximum tolerated dose for at least 3 months each before declaring treatment failure 2
  • Premature discontinuation of TNF inhibitors: Results in high relapse rates (60-74%) 3
  • Using systemic corticosteroids for axial disease: No evidence supports this and potential side effects are significant 1, 2
  • Prescribing DMARDs for axial disease: These are ineffective for axial manifestations and delay appropriate TNF inhibitor therapy 1, 6
  • Failing to assess cardiovascular and GI risk before NSAID prescription: NSAIDs carry significant toxicity that requires risk stratification 1
  • Not continuing TNF inhibitor alone when effective: Adding NSAIDs or DMARDs to effective TNF inhibitor therapy is not recommended 3

Monitoring Strategy

Disease monitoring should include patient history (questionnaires including BASDAI), clinical parameters, laboratory tests (CRP, ESR), and imaging according to clinical presentation and ASAS core set 1, 2

Frequency of monitoring should be determined by symptom course, severity, and treatment intensity 1

Spinal radiographs should not be repeated more frequently than every 2 years unless clearly indicated 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Initial Management of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Dose and Duration of Anti-TNF Therapy in Ankylosing Spondylitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Traitement de la Spondylarthrite Ankylosante avec Vascularite

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.