Single Donor Platelet Transfusions
Single-donor apheresis platelets and pooled random-donor platelet concentrates are clinically interchangeable in routine circumstances, with comparable post-transfusion increments, platelet survival, and hemostatic effectiveness. 1
When Single-Donor Platelets Are Required
Single-donor platelets are the only option when histocompatible (HLA-matched) platelets are needed for patients who are refractory to random donor transfusions. 1 This represents the primary absolute indication for single-donor products.
Clinical Equivalence in Routine Use
The evidence consistently demonstrates no clinically meaningful differences between single-donor and pooled products:
- Post-transfusion platelet increments are equivalent between single-donor apheresis platelets and pooled platelet concentrates 1
- Hemostatic benefit is comparable with either product type 1
- Platelet survival is similar regardless of preparation method 1
- Adverse effects occur at similar rates with both products 1
The Alloimmunization Question
A critical randomized trial (TRAP study) definitively addressed whether single-donor platelets reduce alloimmunization:
- Single-donor platelets showed no additional advantage over filtered pooled platelets in reducing alloimmunization or refractoriness 1
- Both leukoreduced single-donor and leukoreduced pooled products reduced lymphocytotoxic antibody formation to 17-21% compared to 45% with unmodified products 1
- The key factor is leukoreduction, not whether platelets come from single or multiple donors 1
Disease Transmission Considerations
The theoretical advantage of reduced donor exposure with single-donor platelets has not translated to measurable clinical benefit:
- No evidence exists that transfusion-transmitted infection rates differ between single-donor and pooled products in oncology patients with contemporary screening and testing 1
- This may be relevant only for patients receiving very few total transfusions 1
- Oncology patients typically require dozens of donor exposures during treatment, negating any theoretical advantage 1
Practical and Economic Factors
Single-donor platelets cost 50-100% more than equivalent doses of pooled concentrates, even accounting for pooling and filtration costs 1
Advantages of single-donor products:
- Most current apheresis procedures produce inherently leukodepleted products (typically <5 × 10⁶ leukocytes) 1
- No pooling required at time of transfusion, reducing staff time 1
- Facilitates HLA matching when needed 1
Advantages of pooled products:
- Lower cost remains significant even after accounting for filtration 1
- Equally effective when leukoreduced 1
Leukoreduction: The Critical Factor
Leukoreduction of both platelet and RBC products should be provided to patients with acute myeloid leukemia from diagnosis to reduce alloimmunization and platelet refractoriness 1, 2
- This recommendation likely extends to other leukemias and cancer patients receiving chemotherapy 1, 2
- Prestorage leukoreduction is now standard in the United States and many countries, making the inherent leukodepletion advantage of apheresis products less relevant 1, 2
- Leukoreduction also reduces febrile reactions and CMV transmission 1, 2
Clinical Decision Algorithm
For routine prophylactic or therapeutic platelet transfusions:
- Use whichever product (single-donor or pooled) is most readily available and cost-effective at your institution 1
- Ensure products are leukoreduced 1, 2
For patients with documented platelet refractoriness due to alloimmunization:
For patients with history of severe allergic reactions:
- Consider single-donor platelets to limit donor exposures, though this is not evidence-based 1
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume single-donor platelets prevent alloimmunization better than leukoreduced pooled products—the TRAP trial definitively showed equivalence 1
- Do not use single-donor platelets routinely based solely on theoretical disease transmission benefits—no evidence supports this in patients requiring multiple transfusions 1
- Do not forget that only 10-15% of AML patients actually benefit clinically from alloimmunization prevention strategies, as antibodies often develop late in treatment 1
- Verify your institution's apheresis product specifications—some centers split collections into two products, affecting dosing 1