What tests should I order for a patient with a positive beta-D-glucan (BDG) test?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Workup for Positive Beta-D-Glucan

When you encounter a positive beta-D-glucan (BDG) result, immediately repeat the test within 3-5 days and obtain blood cultures, as two consecutive positive BDG results significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and a single positive result has poor specificity. 1

Immediate Assessment Steps

Repeat Beta-D-Glucan Testing

  • Obtain a second BDG test within 3-5 days to confirm persistent positivity, as two consecutive positive results increase specificity from approximately 60% to 78% 2, 1
  • A single positive result has limited positive predictive value, particularly in ICU settings where false positivity is common 2

Obtain Blood Cultures

  • Draw at least two sets of blood cultures from different sites before initiating antifungal therapy 1, 3
  • Blood culture sensitivity for invasive fungal infections ranges from only 21-71%, so negative cultures do not exclude infection 2, 3
  • Blood cultures may take 2-5 days to become positive, but remain essential for species identification and susceptibility testing 2

Order Complementary Fungal Biomarkers

  • Obtain serum galactomannan (GM) testing if aspergillosis is suspected, as GM has higher specificity than BDG for mold infections 2, 1
  • The combination of positive blood culture OR positive BDG has 79% sensitivity for invasive candidiasis, while positive blood culture OR positive PCR reaches 98% sensitivity 2
  • Consider Candida PCR if available, which has pooled sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 92% for invasive candidiasis 2

Imaging Studies

High-Resolution Chest CT

  • Obtain high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) if pulmonary involvement is suspected, as early fungal infiltrates are often missed on conventional chest X-rays 2, 1
  • Look for the "halo sign" (nodules 1-3 cm surrounded by ground-glass opacification), which suggests perifocal hemorrhage from angioinvasive fungal infection 2
  • The "hypodense sign" (central hypodensity within nodules) is highly specific for fungal angiotropism with hemorrhagic infarction 2
  • Cavitations and air-crescent signs typically appear during or after neutrophil recovery 2

Baseline CT Before Therapy

  • Perform baseline chest CT in high-risk patients before starting intensive chemotherapy, as 38% of patients have pre-existing abnormalities that complicate later interpretation 4

Site-Specific Cultures

Obtain Cultures from Sterile Sites

  • Collect cultures from any normally sterile site with clinical suspicion of infection, including cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, joint fluid, or tissue biopsies 2, 1
  • For suspected intra-abdominal candidiasis, BDG becomes positive a median of 5-6 days before positive intra-abdominal cultures 2
  • Tissue biopsy with histopathology provides definitive diagnosis when accessible 4

Do NOT Culture Respiratory Secretions

  • Never use Candida isolation from respiratory secretions (sputum, tracheal aspirates) to guide antifungal treatment, as this represents colonization, not infection 5, 3

Assess for False Positive Causes

Common Confounding Factors

Before acting on a positive BDG, evaluate for these causes of false positivity:

  • Hemodialysis with cellulose-containing membranes 2, 1, 5
  • Administration of albumin or intravenous immunoglobulin products 2, 1, 5
  • Antibiotics, particularly piperacillin-tazobactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate 2, 1
  • Gram-positive or gram-negative bacteremia (10 of 14 bacteremic patients had false positive BDG) 1, 6
  • Surgical gauze or glucan-containing medical materials 2, 1
  • Mucositis or gastrointestinal mucosal disruption 1
  • Fungal colonization without invasive disease 1

Risk Stratification

High-Risk Features Requiring Aggressive Workup

Assess for these risk factors that increase likelihood of true invasive fungal infection:

  • Neutropenia (especially >10 days) or hematologic malignancy 2, 1, 4
  • Hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation 1
  • Prolonged ICU stay with multiple risk factors 1
  • Recent abdominal surgery with complications 1
  • Monocytopenia >10 days 4
  • Karnofsky score <90 4
  • Persistent fever despite broad-spectrum antibiotics 1

Additional Diagnostic Tests

Ophthalmologic Examination

  • Perform dilated fundoscopic examination to rule out Candida endophthalmitis in all patients with candidemia 5

Consider Bronchoalveolar Lavage

  • Obtain bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) with GM testing if pulmonary aspergillosis is suspected, as BAL GM has higher sensitivity than serum GM 1

Special Population Considerations

Avoid BDG in Certain Populations

  • Do not use BDG for clinical decision-making in pediatric patients, as optimal thresholds are not established and mean BDG levels are higher in uninfected children 1
  • BDG has extremely poor performance in lung transplant recipients (specificity only 9%, positive predictive value 14%), with 90% having at least one false positive result 1

Patients on Antifungal Prophylaxis

  • Recognize that BDG sensitivity may be reduced in patients receiving mold-active antifungal prophylaxis 1
  • Echinocandins may cause false-negative BDG results by inhibiting β-D-glucan synthase 2

Critical Limitations of BDG Testing

Fungi NOT Detected by BDG

  • BDG does NOT detect mucormycosis (Zygomycetes) 1, 5
  • BDG does NOT reliably detect Cryptococcus species 2, 1
  • If mucormycosis is suspected (negative GM, clinical presentation), BDG negativity increases likelihood of this diagnosis 1

Fungi Detected by BDG

  • BDG detects Candida species, Aspergillus species, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Fusarium, Trichosporon, Saccharomyces, and Acremonium 2, 5, 7
  • BDG cannot differentiate between these fungal species, requiring additional testing for species identification 2, 5

When to Initiate Empiric Antifungal Therapy

Start Treatment While Awaiting Results If:

  • Patient is critically ill with septic shock and high clinical suspicion for invasive candidiasis 1
  • Patient is neutropenic with persistent fever despite broad-spectrum antibiotics and high-risk features 1
  • Clinical deterioration with radiographic findings suggestive of invasive fungal infection 1
  • Two consecutive positive BDG results plus clinical signs of infection plus high-risk factors 2, 1

Preferred Empiric Regimen

  • Echinocandin is first-line for suspected invasive candidiasis: caspofungin 70 mg loading then 50 mg daily, micafungin 100 mg daily, or anidulafungin 200 mg loading then 100 mg daily 1, 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never initiate antifungal therapy based solely on a single positive BDG without supporting clinical or microbiological evidence 1, 5
  • Do not ignore the high negative predictive value (>90%): a negative BDG is useful for ruling out invasive fungal infection 5, 3, 6
  • Do not use BDG results from respiratory secretions or colonization sites to guide treatment 5
  • Remember that source control (catheter removal, abscess drainage) is essential for successful treatment 5, 3

References

Guideline

Approach to Indeterminate Beta-D-Glucan Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Elevated Fungitell Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Positive Fungitell Result

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Detection of plasma (1 --> 3)-beta-D-glucan in patients with Fusarium, Trichosporon, Saccharomyces and Acremonium fungaemias.

Journal of medical and veterinary mycology : bi-monthly publication of the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology, 1997

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.