What antifungal therapy is recommended for a patient with a positive beta-D-glucan test on cefepime?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 7, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Positive Beta-D-Glucan in Patients on Cefepime

Critical First Step: Do Not Treat Based on Beta-D-Glucan Alone

A positive beta-D-glucan test in a patient receiving cefepime should NOT automatically trigger antifungal therapy, as beta-lactam antibiotics (including cefepime) can cause false-positive results, and the test has limited positive predictive value (PPV) requiring clinical correlation and additional diagnostic workup. 1

Understanding the False Positive Risk

  • Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase combinations (particularly piperacillin-tazobactam) are well-documented causes of false-positive galactomannan results, and similar concerns exist for beta-D-glucan testing with beta-lactam antibiotics 1
  • The specificity of beta-D-glucan ranges from 65-95% in various studies, with PPV as low as 11.8-18% in some populations, meaning many positive results do not represent true invasive fungal infection 1, 2
  • Additional causes of false positivity include: bacteremia, hemodialysis, administration of albumin or immunoglobulin products, hemolysis, exposure to surgical gauze, and gastrointestinal mucositis 1

Diagnostic Algorithm for Positive Beta-D-Glucan

Step 1: Repeat Testing (Days 1-3)

  • Obtain serial beta-D-glucan measurements over 2-3 consecutive days 1, 3
  • Two consecutive positive results significantly improve specificity and PPV compared to a single positive test 1, 4, 2
  • A single negative result has extremely low sensitivity and should not rule out invasive fungal infection 1

Step 2: Assess Clinical Risk Factors

High-risk features that increase likelihood of true invasive fungal infection include:

  • Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <500 cells/μL) 1
  • Hematologic malignancy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 1
  • Prolonged ICU stay with multiple risk factors (>7 days with central venous catheter, broad-spectrum antibiotics, parenteral nutrition, dialysis, surgery, pancreatitis, or immunosuppressive therapy) 1, 3
  • Recent abdominal surgery with complications or tertiary peritonitis 1
  • Persistent fever despite 4+ days of appropriate antibacterial therapy 1

Step 3: Obtain Complementary Diagnostic Tests

  • Blood cultures: Minimum of two sets from different sites on consecutive days 1, 3
  • High-resolution chest CT: Look for macronodules with halo sign (suggests invasive aspergillosis), cavitary lesions, or wedge-shaped peripheral infiltrates 1
  • Galactomannan testing: If aspergillosis is suspected (detects only Aspergillus species, not Candida) 1
  • Site-specific cultures: From normally sterile sites when clinically indicated (peritoneal fluid, abscess drainage, tissue biopsy) 1

Treatment Decision Framework

Initiate Antifungal Therapy When:

Echinocandins are the first-line empirical therapy for suspected invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients with positive beta-D-glucan plus clinical risk factors. 1

Specific indications for treatment initiation:

  • Consecutive positive beta-D-glucan results (2+ tests) PLUS high-risk clinical features PLUS signs of sepsis unresponsive to antibiotics 1, 4, 3
  • Positive blood cultures for Candida species (even a single positive culture constitutes candidemia requiring treatment) 1
  • Radiographic findings suggestive of invasive fungal infection (halo sign, nodular lesions) PLUS positive beta-D-glucan 1
  • Proven or probable invasive fungal infection by EORTC/MSG criteria 1

First-Line Antifungal Regimens:

For non-neutropenic critically ill patients:

  • Echinocandin (preferred): Caspofungin 70 mg loading dose, then 50 mg daily; OR micafungin 100 mg daily; OR anidulafungin 200 mg loading dose, then 100 mg daily 1, 4, 5
  • Alternative: Fluconazole 800 mg loading dose, then 400 mg daily (only if patient is hemodynamically stable and no prior azole exposure) 1

For neutropenic patients:

  • Echinocandin OR liposomal amphotericin B (3-5 mg/kg daily) 1
  • Voriconazole is considered a reliable alternative despite not meeting strict statistical noninferiority in some trials 1

Do NOT Initiate Antifungal Therapy When:

  • Single positive beta-D-glucan with consecutive negative repeat tests 4, 3
  • Candida isolated from respiratory secretions only (represents colonization, not infection) 1
  • Low-risk patient without clinical signs of infection 1
  • Fungal colonization at single site without systemic signs 1

Duration and Monitoring

Treatment Duration:

  • For documented candidemia: Minimum 14 days after first negative blood culture AND resolution of clinical symptoms 6, 7
  • Mandatory ophthalmologic examination to rule out endophthalmitis in all candidemia cases 6

Source Control (Critical):

  • Remove infected central venous catheters within 24-48 hours 6, 7
  • Drain abscesses or infected fluid collections 6, 7
  • Surgical debridement of infected tissues when indicated 1

Special Considerations for Cefepime Context

  • Cefepime itself is not specifically listed as causing false-positive beta-D-glucan (unlike piperacillin-tazobactam for galactomannan), but all beta-lactams carry theoretical risk 1
  • If patient has bacteremia while on cefepime, this is an independent cause of false-positive beta-D-glucan 1
  • Consider switching to non-beta-lactam antibiotic if feasible to clarify beta-D-glucan results, though this is rarely practical 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never treat based on single positive beta-D-glucan without supporting evidence 1, 4
  • Do not ignore negative predictive value: Consecutive negative tests effectively rule out invasive fungal infection (NPV >90%) 1, 4, 8
  • Beta-D-glucan does NOT detect mucormycosis (Zygomycetes) or Cryptococcus species 1
  • Antifungal prophylaxis or treatment reduces test sensitivity, potentially causing false negatives 1, 4
  • In lung transplant recipients, beta-D-glucan has particularly poor specificity (as low as 9%) and should not guide therapy 4

Preemptive vs. Empirical Strategy

  • Preemptive therapy (treating only when biomarkers suggest infection) remains largely experimental and is not standard practice 1
  • Empirical therapy for persistently febrile high-risk patients is still the standard approach, though serial beta-D-glucan monitoring can guide early discontinuation in patients with consecutive negative results 1, 3
  • In one study, 75% of high-risk ICU patients discontinued empirical echinocandin on day 4 based on negative beta-D-glucan (days 1-3) with no subsequent candidemia through day 30 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Approach to Indeterminate Beta-D-Glucan Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Positive Fungitell Result

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Elevated Fungitell Results

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Multicenter clinical evaluation of the (1-->3) beta-D-glucan assay as an aid to diagnosis of fungal infections in humans.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2005

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.