What are the differences in indications and dosing between cefexime (Cefexime) and cefpodoxime (Cefpodoxime) for various infections?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cefixime vs Cefpodoxime: Key Differences in Indications and Dosing

Cefixime is superior to cefpodoxime for gonorrhea treatment, while both agents have similar efficacy for respiratory and urinary tract infections, though cefixime requires only once-daily dosing compared to cefpodoxime's twice-daily regimen.

Gonorrhea Treatment: Critical Distinction

  • Cefixime 400 mg orally is an established alternative for uncomplicated urogenital and anorectal gonorrhea, though it is less preferred than ceftriaxone 1.

  • Cefpodoxime proxetil 200 mg PO is less active against N. gonorrhoeae than cefixime and does not meet minimum efficacy criteria with cure rates of only 96.5% (CI = 94.8%-98.9%) for urogenital and rectal infection 1.

  • Cefpodoxime's efficacy in treating pharyngeal gonorrhea is unsatisfactory at 78.9% (CI = 54.5%-94%), making it unsuitable for this indication 1.

  • For gonorrhea, cefixime 400 mg single dose is the only acceptable oral cephalosporin alternative when ceftriaxone cannot be used 2.

Urinary Tract Infections

Uncomplicated Cystitis

  • Cefpodoxime 200 mg twice daily for 10 days is an acceptable option for uncomplicated pyelonephritis, though fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are preferred 1.

  • Cefixime is FDA-approved for uncomplicated UTIs caused by E. coli and Proteus mirabilis in adults and children ≥6 months 2.

  • Cefpodoxime has lower bacterial eradication rates for cystitis compared to other approved agents, which should be considered when selecting therapy 3.

  • Both agents achieved 70-82% bacteriological cure rates in clinical trials for uncomplicated UTIs 4.

Pyelonephritis

  • Cefpodoxime 200 mg twice daily for 10 days is listed as an empirical oral option for uncomplicated pyelonephritis 1.

  • An initial intravenous dose of a long-acting parenteral antimicrobial (e.g., ceftriaxone 1 g) should be administered if oral cephalosporins like cefpodoxime are used empirically 1.

  • Cefixime is not specifically recommended in major pyelonephritis guidelines, suggesting cefpodoxime may be preferred for this indication 1.

Respiratory Tract Infections

Otitis Media and Pharyngitis

  • Cefixime is FDA-approved for otitis media caused by H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and S. pyogenes in patients ≥6 months 2.

  • For otitis media caused by S. pneumoniae, cefixime's response was approximately 10% lower than comparators, representing a significant limitation 2.

  • Cefpodoxime is indicated for pharyngitis/tonsillitis caused by S. pyogenes, though penicillin remains the drug of choice 3.

  • Both agents are effective for pharyngitis, but neither establishes efficacy for rheumatic fever prophylaxis 2, 3.

Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

  • Cefixime is approved for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis caused by S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae 2.

  • Cefpodoxime is indicated for community-acquired pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae (including beta-lactamase-producing strains) 3.

  • Cefpodoxime was as efficacious as parenteral ceftriaxone for bronchopneumonia in hospitalized high-risk patients, a notable advantage 5.

Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

  • Cefpodoxime is FDA-approved for uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections caused by S. aureus (including penicillinase-producing strains) or S. pyogenes 3.

  • The effective therapeutic dose for skin infections with cefpodoxime was higher than doses used for other indications, requiring careful attention to dosing 3.

  • Cefixime lacks FDA approval for skin and soft tissue infections, making cefpodoxime the clear choice for these conditions 2.

  • This reflects cefpodoxime's enhanced antistaphylococcal activity, which distinguishes it from cefixime 5.

Dosing Regimens

Standard Dosing

  • Cefixime: 400 mg once daily for most indications in adults 2.

  • Cefpodoxime: 100-400 mg twice daily depending on indication, with 200 mg twice daily most common 3, 5.

Pediatric Dosing

  • Cefpodoxime: 8-10 mg/kg/day in 1-2 divided doses for children 6.

  • Cefpodoxime: 10 mg/kg/day in 2 doses for pediatric UTI treatment 1.

  • Both agents are approved for children ≥6 months of age 2, 3.

Pharmacokinetic Advantages

  • Cefixime's extended half-life permits once-daily dosing, improving compliance 2.

  • Cefpodoxime has a plasma half-life of 1.9-3.7 hours, necessitating twice-daily administration 5.

  • Cefpodoxime proxetil has 68% absolute bioavailability after oral administration with food 7.

  • Both agents achieve adequate tissue penetration in respiratory secretions, bronchial mucosa, and interstitial fluid 5, 7.

Safety Profile

  • Both agents are generally well tolerated with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal disturbances in 4-15% of patients 5, 7.

  • Adverse reactions include diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, typically mild and transient 5, 7.

  • There is no significant difference in overall adverse event incidence between the two agents 4.

Clinical Pitfalls

  • Never use cefpodoxime for gonorrhea due to inadequate efficacy, particularly for pharyngeal infections 1.

  • Consider cefpodoxime's lower eradication rates for cystitis when other agents are available 3.

  • For S. pneumoniae otitis media, cefixime has reduced efficacy compared to other agents 2.

  • Cefpodoxime requires higher doses for skin infections than for other indications 3.

  • Neither agent should replace penicillin for S. pyogenes pharyngitis when rheumatic fever prophylaxis is the goal 2, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.