Treatment of Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB)
Primary Recommendation
Isolated RBBB without symptoms or other cardiac abnormalities requires no specific treatment—observation only is recommended. 1
Assessment and Risk Stratification
The initial approach depends entirely on whether RBBB is isolated or associated with symptoms and additional conduction abnormalities:
For Asymptomatic Isolated RBBB:
- No treatment is indicated beyond regular follow-up monitoring 1, 2
- Schedule periodic ECG monitoring to detect progression to more complex conduction disorders 1, 2
- Obtain echocardiography if structural heart disease is suspected, though the threshold for imaging is lower than with LBBB 3
- Recognize that isolated RBBB occurs in <2% of the general population and may signal underlying cardiovascular disease warranting evaluation 1
For Symptomatic RBBB or Additional Conduction Abnormalities:
- Obtain 24-hour to 14-day ambulatory ECG monitoring to establish symptom-rhythm correlation and detect intermittent higher-degree AV block 2
- Proceed to electrophysiology study (EPS) in patients with syncope to measure HV interval and assess for infranodal block 2
- Permanent pacing is definitively indicated when syncope occurs with RBBB and EPS demonstrates HV interval ≥70 ms 1, 2
Specific Clinical Scenarios Requiring Intervention
Bifascicular Block (RBBB + Hemiblock):
- Carefully evaluate for progressive cardiac conduction disease 1, 2
- Consider electrophysiologic study to evaluate atrioventricular conduction 2
- Screen siblings with ECG if bifascicular block is present in a young athlete 2
Alternating Bundle Branch Block:
- Permanent pacing is mandatory due to high risk of developing complete atrioventricular block 1, 2, 3
Acute Myocardial Infarction with New RBBB:
- Ensure transcutaneous pacing capability is immediately available (Class I recommendation) for new RBBB with first-degree AV block 1, 2, 3
- Consider temporary transvenous pacing (Class IIb recommendation) 1, 2
- Provide immediate reperfusion therapy—RBBB patients have 64% increased odds of in-hospital death compared to those without bundle branch block 3, 4
- Recognize that RBBB obscures ST-segment analysis, leading to dangerous undertreatment—only 32% of RBBB patients with acute MI receive fibrinolytic therapy compared to 65.5% without bundle branch block 3
- Do not dismiss chest pain because ST-segments are difficult to interpret 3
Heart Failure with RBBB:
- Post hoc analysis of REVERSE, MADIT-CRT, and RAFT trials showed that patients with non-LBBB QRS morphology (including RBBB) do not derive significant benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) 5
- However, RBBB patients demonstrating left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking radial strain or interventricular mechanical delay may benefit from CRT 5
- A long Q-LV time predicts good CRT response, even for patients with RBBB, emphasizing the importance of accurate tailoring of pacing therapy 5
Special Genetic/Infiltrative Conditions:
- Permanent pacing is reasonable for Kearns-Sayre syndrome with conduction disorders 2
- Consider permanent pacing in Anderson-Fabry disease with QRS prolongation >110 ms 2
- Obtain cardiac MRI when sarcoidosis, connective tissue disease, myocarditis, or infiltrative cardiomyopathies are suspected, as cardiac MRI detects subclinical abnormalities in 33-42% of patients with conduction disease and normal echocardiograms 2
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not assume all RBBB patterns are benign—evaluate for underlying structural heart disease, especially when new-onset 1
- Avoid unnecessary permanent pacing for isolated RBBB without symptoms or other conduction abnormalities 1
- Do not confuse isolated RBBB with bifascicular block (RBBB + hemiblock), which carries higher risk of progression to complete AV block 3
- Do not assume RBBB configuration during tachycardia excludes ventricular tachycardia, particularly in congenital heart disease patients where 25% of VT has RBBB morphology 3
- In patients with incomplete RBBB who progress to complete RBBB, monitor closely as they show higher incidence of heart failure and chronic kidney disease 6
Prognosis and Monitoring
- Complete RBBB is associated with male sex and increasing age 6
- Bifascicular block shows statistically significant association with increased all-cause mortality 6
- Incomplete RBBB is not associated with adverse outcomes 6
- RBBB patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement have increased need for permanent pacemaker implantation (adjusted OR: 4.18) and higher rates of cardiac arrest and post-procedural heart failure 7