Are CPT codes 64493, 64494, 64495, 27096, 20552, and 20553 medically necessary for a 51-year-old patient with bilateral hip pain, multilevel spondylosis, and mild spinal stenosis, who has tried conservative treatments including dihydropyridine (Calcium Channel Blocker), etoricoxib (COX-2 inhibitor), and tramadol (Opioid analgesic) without adequate relief?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Determination: NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY

Based on the CPB 0016 criteria provided, the requested procedures are NOT medically necessary because the patient has not met the required duration of conservative treatment (minimum 6 weeks) and the pain duration requirement (minimum 3 months).

Critical Missing Criteria

The patient fails to meet two essential requirements from CPB 0016:

  • Pain duration: Symptoms present for only 2 weeks, but criteria requires >3 months of pain
  • Conservative treatment duration: Current medications (dihydropyridine, etoricoxib, tramadol) have been tried, but no documentation of 6+ weeks of structured conservative therapy including physical therapy

Criteria Analysis

Met Criteria

  • Facet joint syndrome symptoms present: Absence of radiculopathy, pain aggravated by extension/rotation (positive FADIR/FABER tests) [@CPB 0016@]
  • Provocative testing positive: Physical examination confirms pain with extension and rotation [@CPB 0016@]
  • Imaging excludes other causes: MRI shows spondylosis and facet arthropathy without fracture, tumor, or infection [@CPB 0016@]
  • Pain limits daily activities: Sleep disruption and impaired sports activities documented [@CPB 0016@]

Unmet Criteria (CRITICAL)

  • Pain duration <3 months: Only 2 weeks of symptoms documented [@CPB 0016@]
  • Inadequate conservative treatment duration: No documentation of 6+ weeks of physical therapy [@CPB 0016@]
  • Radiofrequency neurolysis consideration: Not documented as planned next step [@CPB 0016@]

Specific CPT Code Analysis

Facet Joint Injections (64493,64494,64495)

NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY - While the patient has appropriate clinical findings for facet-mediated pain (multilevel spondylosis L3-S1, facet arthropathy), the temporal requirements are not met [@CPB 0016@]. The 2-week symptom duration falls far short of the 3-month minimum.

Sacroiliac Joint Injections (27096)

NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY - Despite positive FABER testing and MRI showing sacroiliac degenerative changes, the same temporal criteria apply. Additionally, the primary complaint is hip/groin pain with gluteal tendinopathy, not isolated sacroiliac pain [@CPB 0016@].

Trigger Point Injections (20552,20553)

NOT MEDICALLY NECESSARY - While Grade 2 gluteus medius/minimus tendinopathy is documented, trigger point injections are not the appropriate intervention for insertional tendinopathy. The ACR/Arthritis Foundation guidelines recommend NSAIDs and physical therapy as first-line treatment for hip osteoarthritis and related conditions 1. Ultrasound-guided glucocorticoid injection directly into the greater trochanteric bursa would be more appropriate than trigger point injections if conservative measures fail 1.

Appropriate Clinical Pathway

Immediate Management (Weeks 1-6)

  1. Optimize pharmacologic therapy: The current regimen includes tramadol, which has only modest efficacy for hip/knee osteoarthritis with significant adverse effects 2. Consider:

    • NSAIDs (etoricoxib 90mg is appropriate) with gastroprotection if needed 1
    • Duloxetine as adjunct for chronic pain if NSAIDs insufficient 1
    • Discontinue dihydropyridine (calcium channel blocker) unless indicated for hypertension, as it has no role in pain management
  2. Structured physical therapy: Minimum 6 weeks of supervised therapy targeting:

    • Hip strengthening exercises for gluteal tendinopathy 3
    • Core stabilization for lumbar spondylosis 1
    • Low-impact activities (swimming, cycling) 3
  3. Activity modification: Avoid aggravating movements while maintaining mobility 3

Re-evaluation at 6-8 Weeks

If pain persists after documented 6+ weeks of conservative treatment AND symptoms have been present for >3 months total, then reconsider:

  • Diagnostic facet joint injections (intra-articular or medial branch blocks) for L3-S1 [@CPB 0016@]
  • Ultrasound-guided greater trochanteric bursa injection (NOT trigger point injection) for gluteal tendinopathy 1
  • Sacroiliac joint injection only if isolated SI joint pain predominates [@CPB 0016@]

Special Considerations

Hip pathology vs. spine pathology: The clinical presentation suggests overlapping hip and spine pathology 4. The femoroacetabular impingement (CAM deformity) and labral fraying may be the primary pain generators rather than facet joints. Consider:

  • Diagnostic intra-articular hip injection with local anesthetic to differentiate hip from spine pain 5, 6
  • Orthopedic consultation for potential hip arthroscopy if conservative measures fail 5

Red flags: The acute 2-week onset with radiation to the thigh warrants careful monitoring to exclude:

  • Progressive neurologic deficits requiring urgent intervention 7
  • Occult fracture in setting of spondylolisthesis 6

Rationale Summary

The CPB 0016 criteria exist to ensure that invasive procedures are reserved for patients with chronic, refractory pain who have exhausted appropriate conservative measures. This patient's 2-week symptom duration represents an acute exacerbation that may respond to optimized medical management and physical therapy. Proceeding with multiple bilateral injections (10 separate procedures) at this early stage:

  1. Violates evidence-based temporal criteria [@CPB 0016@]
  2. Exposes the patient to unnecessary procedural risks
  3. May delay diagnosis of the true pain generator (likely hip joint pathology) 5, 4
  4. Does not align with guideline recommendations for initial management 1

Recommendation: DENY current request. Approve conservative management for 6-8 weeks with re-evaluation for interventional procedures only if pain persists beyond 3 months total duration with documented failure of conservative therapy.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Non-Infectious Psoas Inflammation Treatment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Differentiating Hip Pathology From Lumbar Spine Pathology: Key Points of Evaluation and Management.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 2017

Research

Evaluation of the patient with hip pain.

American family physician, 2014

Research

Missed thoracic myelopathy: Do not throw the hammer away yet.

Surgical neurology international, 2019

Related Questions

What are the differential diagnoses for a 40-year-old female with transient left-sided hip, shoulder, and knee pain after inactivity?
What is the best course of treatment for a 64-year-old female with hip and lower back pain?
What is the next best step for a 58-year-old male patient with persistent bilateral hip pain despite completing physical therapy (PT), who has been taking Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and Tylenol (acetaminophen) since 2020, and also has a left foot deformity due to a congenital absence of the 4th metatarsal, causing difficulty with ambulation?
What is the best initial intervention for an 80-year-old patient with severe left hip pain (10/10) and a history of similar pain 6 months ago, with a previously normal X-ray?
What is the best diagnostic evaluation for hip pain in an 81-year-old after a mechanical fall with limited range of motion and atrophy (osteopenia) on x-ray?
Is Augmentin (amoxicillin-clavulanate) safe to use in patients with heart problems?
What is the management and treatment of Kennedy's disease (Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy, SBMA)?
What is the next step in management for a patient with a history of myocardial infarction (MI), abnormal rest/stress Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion images, and mildly reduced left ventricle function?
What are the signs of myocardial infarction (MI) on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)?
What is the recommended treatment for Pseudomonas (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) cellulitis?
What is the importance of understanding the relationship between depression and motor severity in Parkinson's disease?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.