Is the treatment plan of infliximab (Infliximab-abda) and secukinumab (Secukinumab) medically necessary and considered standard of care for a 19-year-old female patient with severe and refractory Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medical Necessity Review for Infliximab Continuation in Severe Refractory Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This off-label treatment with infliximab 10 mg/kg every 4 weeks DOES continue to meet medical necessity for this 19-year-old female with Hurley Stage III hidradenitis suppurativa who has failed multiple prior therapies and is now on dual biologic therapy with secukinumab.

Rationale for Medical Necessity Approval

Patient Meets All Established Criteria

This patient has exhausted appropriate first-line and second-line therapies before escalation to biologics:

  • Antibiotic trials completed: Failed >90 days of oral antibiotics including doxycycline, clindamycin, and augmentin 1
  • Anti-androgen therapy attempted: Trialed spironolactone (discontinued due to nausea) 1
  • Multiple biologic failures: Failed adalimumab 80 mg q2 weeks for 6 months (inadequate disease control), failed infliximab monotherapy at both 10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg dosing 1
  • Severe disease classification: Hurley Stage III with involvement of groin, buttocks, and bilateral axillae with fistulous tracts and scarring 1, 2

Infliximab is Guideline-Supported for Pediatric/Young Adult HS

The 2025 North American Clinical Practice Guidelines explicitly support infliximab use in this age group:

  • Pediatric recommendation: Infliximab is suggested for patients 6 years and older with HS requiring biologics 1
  • Dosing supported: Standard dosing is 5-10 mg/kg at weeks 0,2,6, then every 4 weeks for maintenance 2, 3
  • Evidence quality: This recommendation carries conditional strength with moderate quality evidence 1

Clinical Response Documentation Supports Continuation

The patient demonstrates positive clinical response meeting continuation criteria:

  • Subjective improvement: Patient experienced improvement in pain control and disease activity on dual biologic therapy 3, 4
  • Objective findings: Decreased exudation and fewer new lesions noted on combined infliximab-secukinumab regimen 3
  • Inadequate trial period: Only 3 months on dual therapy (started 09/2025) - insufficient time to assess full treatment response, as 6 months is recommended before reassessment 2
  • Wound healing progress: Active wound management with granulation tissue formation indicates ongoing healing process 2

Standard of Care Analysis

Infliximab is Established Standard of Care for Severe HS

Multiple authoritative guidelines support infliximab as standard therapy:

  • American Academy of Dermatology: Recommends infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0,2,6, and every 2 months for patients who fail adalimumab 2
  • Dosing flexibility: Higher doses (10 mg/kg) and more frequent intervals (every 4 weeks) are supported for severe refractory cases 3, 5
  • Evidence base: Retrospective studies demonstrate 71-93% response rates with significant improvement in subjective symptoms, lesion size, exudation, and fistulous tract development 3, 4

Dual Biologic Therapy is Appropriate for Treatment-Refractory Disease

This patient's clinical scenario justifies combination biologic approach:

  • Secukinumab addition rationale: IL-17 inhibition targets different inflammatory pathway than TNF-alpha blockade 1
  • Pediatric support: Secukinumab is suggested for patients 6 years and older with HS requiring biologics 1
  • Real-world evidence: Secukinumab shows 64.5-71.4% HiSCR response rates in adalimumab-failure patients at 16-52 weeks 6, 7
  • Safety profile: Generally well-tolerated with minimal adverse effects in HS populations 6, 7

Critical Clinical Context

Why This Case Requires Continued Infliximab

Premature discontinuation would be clinically inappropriate:

  • Insufficient trial duration: Only 3 months on optimized dual therapy versus recommended 6-month assessment period 2
  • Disease severity: Hurley Stage III with chronic wounds requiring specialized wound care - this represents the most severe disease classification 1, 2
  • Limited alternatives: Patient has already failed adalimumab, and switching to another TNF-alpha inhibitor would not address the underlying treatment resistance 2, 5
  • Surgical limitations: Extensive disease with slow wound healing and granulation tissue formation makes surgical intervention higher risk 2

Safety and Monitoring Considerations

Treatment is being appropriately monitored:

  • TB screening completed: Negative QuantiFERON-TB Gold test documented 09/06/2024 2
  • Infusion reactions: Only mild headache reported, no treatment discontinuation required 3
  • Regular follow-up: Patient seen every 4 months with wound care nurse involvement 2
  • Pain management: Appropriate multimodal approach with NSAIDs, gabapentin, and antimicrobial prophylaxis 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not discontinue therapy prematurely: The 6-month timeframe for dual biologic assessment has not been reached - stopping now would prevent evaluation of true treatment efficacy 2

Do not confuse off-label with experimental: Infliximab for HS is off-label but represents established standard of care supported by multiple guidelines and extensive clinical experience 1, 2, 3, 5

Do not overlook age-appropriate guidelines: The 2025 North American guidelines specifically address pediatric/young adult populations and support infliximab use in patients 6 years and older 1

Do not ignore disease severity: Hurley Stage III disease with fistulous tracts, scarring, and chronic wounds requires aggressive medical management to prevent further morbidity and preserve quality of life 1, 2

Conclusion on Medical Necessity

Both questions answered definitively:

  1. Medical necessity: YES - This treatment plan is medically necessary for Hurley Stage III HS that has failed multiple conventional therapies and single biologic agents, with documented clinical response to dual biologic therapy requiring 6-month assessment period 1, 2

  2. Standard of care: YES - Infliximab is guideline-supported standard therapy for severe refractory HS in this age group, not experimental or investigational 1, 2, 3, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hidradenitis Suppurativa Treatment Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Infliximab for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa.

Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland), 2007

Research

Infliximab for hidradenitis suppurativa.

The British journal of dermatology, 2003

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.