What biologics are recommended for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients after failure of infliximab (Infliximab) and vedolizumab (Vedolizumab)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: March 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

After failure of both infliximab and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis (UC), the recommended biologics to consider are ustekinumab (Stelara) or upadacitinib, with upadacitinib demonstrating superior efficacy in biologic-exposed patients, as shown in the 2024 study by 1.

Key Considerations

  • Ustekinumab is typically administered as an intravenous induction dose of approximately 6 mg/kg, followed by 90 mg subcutaneous injections every 8 weeks for maintenance, as outlined in the study by 1.
  • Upadacitinib is given orally at 10-30 mg twice daily for 8-16 weeks for induction, then 10 mg twice daily for maintenance, with the higher dose showing superior efficacy in biologic-exposed patients, as demonstrated in the study by 1.
  • For patients with inadequate response to standard dosing, consider optimizing therapy by increasing the frequency of ustekinumab to every 4-6 weeks or maintaining the higher dose of upadacitinib.
  • These medications work through different mechanisms than previous failed therapies - ustekinumab targets the p40 subunit shared by IL-12 and IL-23 cytokines, while upadacitinib is a JAK inhibitor that blocks multiple inflammatory pathways, as discussed in the study by 1.

Patient-Specific Factors

  • The choice between these agents should consider patient-specific factors including:
    • Preference for oral versus injectable therapy
    • Comorbidities (particularly avoiding upadacitinib in patients with high thrombosis risk)
    • Insurance coverage
  • Regular monitoring for response is essential, with consideration of colectomy if medical therapy continues to fail despite optimization, as emphasized in the study by 1.

Evidence-Based Recommendation

The recommendation to use ustekinumab or upadacitinib after failure of infliximab and vedolizumab is based on the most recent and highest quality study available, which demonstrates the superior efficacy of upadacitinib in biologic-exposed patients, as shown in the 2024 study by 1. This study highlights the importance of prior treatment exposure on subsequent therapy selection in moderate-to-severe UC, and provides evidence for the use of upadacitinib as a preferred option in this population.

From the FDA Drug Label

Ustekinumab was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies [UC-1 and UC-2 (NCT02407236)] in adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who had an inadequate response to or failed to tolerate a biologic (i.e., TNF blocker and/or vedolizumab), corticosteroids, and/or 6-MP or AZA therapy. A total of 51% had failed at least one biologic and 17% had failed both a TNF blocker and an integrin receptor blocker.

Recommended biologics for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients after failure of infliximab and vedolizumab:

  • Ustekinumab: is a recommended biologic for UC patients who have failed infliximab and/or vedolizumab, as well as corticosteroids, and/or immunomodulators 2.

From the Research

Biologics for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Patients After Failure of Infliximab and Vedolizumab

  • Ustekinumab is a recommended biologic for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and can be considered as a therapeutic option following the failure of other biologics, including anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists and anti-α4ß7 integrin antagonists 3.
  • The efficacy of ustekinumab in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC has been demonstrated in clinical trials 4.
  • A real-world comparison of the effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with UC exposed to at least one anti-TNF agent found that ustekinumab appears to be more effective than vedolizumab in inducing endoscopic and histological remission at week 16 after failure of anti-TNFs in UC 5.
  • Other biologics approved for the treatment of UC include infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, and vedolizumab, and the choice of biologic therapy may depend on patient-specific and disease-specific characteristics as well as biomarkers 6.

Considerations for Biologic Therapy in UC

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics, especially anti-TNF alpha agents, may improve the long-term efficacy of these agents 6.
  • The positioning of ustekinumab in the therapeutic strategy for UC remains unclear, and further studies are required to understand the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with UC, particularly in special situations 3.
  • Primary failure to at least one biologic/small molecule was significantly associated with a decreased rate of steroid-free clinical remission among patients treated with ustekinumab 5.

Related Questions

What is the most appropriate therapy for a 16-year-old boy with a 3-week history of diarrhea (loose stools), occasional bloody stools, crampy abdominal pain, fatigue, and weight loss, diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) based on colonoscopy and biopsy findings?
What is the recommended treatment for a 45-year-old gentleman with chronic bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, fecal incontinence, and significant weight loss, diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) unresponsive to steroids, mesalazine (Mesalamine), and antibiotics, with findings of colonic wall thickening, severely inflamed mucosa, and minimal mucosal inflammatory infiltrate?
What is the comparison between Vedolizumab (Entyvio) and Infliximab in treating severe Ulcerative Colitis (UC)?
Is Stelara (Ustekinumab) infusion medically necessary for the treatment of ulcerative pancolitis with rectal bleeding?
Is infliximab (Remicade) therapy medically necessary for a 17-year-old male patient with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who has failed steroid therapy?
What are the comparative efficacy studies of add-on medication (Add-on pharmacotherapy) and non-medication methods?
What are the parameters of a normal semen analysis?
Is it reasonable to perform an intraoperative cholangiogram during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (lap chole) in a patient with a history of acute cholecystitis, 7 weeks post-cholecystostomy (cholecystostomy tube) drain removal and recent cholangiogram?
What are the United Kingdom (UK) specific guidelines for managing atrophic gastritis?
What is the activation time of intravenous (IV) metoprolol (Lopressor)?
What is the management of iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) in a 35-year-old male according to United Kingdom (UK) guidelines?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.