Procalcitonin for Detecting Appendicitis
Procalcitonin (PCT) should NOT be used as a diagnostic test for acute appendicitis, as it has poor sensitivity (14-44%) and lacks diagnostic value for detecting the disease. 1, 2, 3, 4
Diagnostic Performance for Acute Appendicitis
PCT performs poorly compared to standard inflammatory markers when screening for appendicitis:
- Sensitivity: Only 33% (95% CI 21-47%), meaning it misses two-thirds of appendicitis cases 4
- Specificity: 89% (95% CI 78-95%), which is reasonable but insufficient given the low sensitivity 4
- Area under ROC curve: 0.65, indicating poor overall diagnostic accuracy 4
For comparison, CRP demonstrates superior diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.75) and WBC count also outperforms PCT (AUC 0.72) 4. The World Journal of Emergency Surgery guidelines recommend routine laboratory workup should include WBC, absolute neutrophil count, CRP, and urinalysis—but notably do not recommend routine PCT testing for diagnosis 1.
Limited Role: Identifying Complicated Appendicitis
PCT has value specifically for identifying complicated appendicitis (perforation, gangrene, abscess), not for diagnosing appendicitis itself. 1, 4
When appendicitis is already suspected or confirmed, PCT can help stratify severity:
- Sensitivity for complicated appendicitis: 89% (95% CI 84-93%) 1
- Specificity for complicated appendicitis: 90% (95% CI 86-94%) 1
- Diagnostic odds ratio: 76.73 for complicated disease 1
PCT levels increase progressively with disease severity, with values >0.5 ng/mL suggesting higher risk of perforation or gangrenous appendicitis 2, 3, 5. However, even in complicated cases, only 14.3% of patients show elevated PCT, with remarkably low sensitivity prohibiting routine diagnostic use 2.
Pediatric Considerations
In children, PCT performs similarly poorly for diagnosis but may have adjunctive value:
- PCT has lower diagnostic accuracy than CRP and WBC for detecting appendicitis 1
- Greater value for identifying complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients, similar to adults 1
- The World Journal of Emergency Surgery suggests that adding PCT to routine tests (WBC, CRP) may improve diagnostic discrimination, though it is not widely available 1
One pediatric study reported 95.65% sensitivity and 100% specificity, but this outlier result has not been replicated and contradicts the meta-analysis showing 33% sensitivity 6, 4.
Recommended Diagnostic Approach Instead
Use imaging, not biomarkers, as the primary diagnostic modality:
- Adults: CT abdomen with IV contrast as initial imaging (sensitivity 96-100%, specificity 93-95%) 1, 7
- Children: Ultrasound first (sensitivity 76%, specificity 95%), followed by MRI or CT if equivocal 1, 7
- Pregnant patients: Ultrasound first, then MRI if inconclusive 1
Clinical scoring systems (Alvarado score) combined with standard inflammatory markers (WBC, CRP) outperform PCT for diagnostic decision-making 3, 4.
Key Clinical Pitfalls
- Do not rely on PCT to rule out appendicitis—its 33% sensitivity means negative results are meaningless for excluding disease 4
- Do not order PCT routinely—it is not cost-effective and does not improve diagnostic accuracy over standard markers 5
- Consider PCT only when appendicitis is already confirmed and you need to assess for complications like perforation 1
- PCT values >0.5 ng/mL may prompt more aggressive surgical planning due to higher perforation risk, but this should not replace clinical judgment and imaging findings 3, 5