What is the current workup for peripheral arterial disease (PAD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Current Workup for Peripheral Arterial Disease

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the first-line diagnostic test for PAD, recommended for all patients aged ≥65 years or aged 50-64 years with smoking history or diabetes, with an ABI ≤0.90 confirming the diagnosis. 1

Initial Clinical Assessment

Patient History and Risk Factor Identification

  • Assess for exertional leg symptoms, nonhealing wounds, and walking impairment 1
  • Document smoking history (present in >80% of PAD patients and increases risk 2-6 fold) 2
  • Identify diabetes mellitus (increases PAD risk 2-4 fold) 1, 2
  • Evaluate for coronary artery disease, as PAD and CAD frequently coexist due to shared atherosclerotic pathophysiology 2
  • Note that classic claudication occurs in only 11% of PAD patients, so absence of typical symptoms does not exclude disease 3

Physical Examination

  • Perform comprehensive pulse examination of both lower extremities (femoral, popliteal, dorsalis pedis, posterior tibial) 1, 4
  • Inspect feet for ulcers, gangrene, or tissue loss 1
  • Measure blood pressure in both arms to identify subclavian artery stenosis (difference >15-20 mmHg is significant) 4
  • Assess for neuropathy in diabetic patients, as this increases risk of foot ulceration 2

Diagnostic Testing Algorithm

First-Line: Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)

  • Measure ABI in both legs for all suspected PAD patients 1
  • ABI ≤0.90 confirms PAD diagnosis (sensitivity 79-95%, specificity 95-100%) 1, 5
  • ABI 0.91-0.99 is borderline and warrants close follow-up 1
  • ABI 1.00-1.40 is normal 1
  • ABI >1.40 indicates non-compressible vessels (medial arterial calcification) 1

When ABI is Non-Diagnostic or Unreliable

For non-compressible vessels (ABI >1.40):

  • Obtain toe-brachial index (TBI), as digital arteries are rarely affected by medial calcification 1
  • TBI <0.70 confirms PAD diagnosis 1
  • This scenario is particularly common in patients with long-standing diabetes or advanced age 1

For normal ABI with persistent clinical suspicion:

  • Perform post-exercise ABI (measured 1 minute after standardized treadmill exercise) 1, 4
  • A fall in absolute ankle BP >30 mmHg is diagnostic 1
  • Note that a post-exercise ABI drop >20% has high false-positive rates in healthy populations and should be interpreted cautiously 1

Supplementary Non-Invasive Tests

Duplex ultrasound (DUS):

  • Recommended as first-line imaging for PAD screening and anatomic localization 1
  • Provides dynamic, non-invasive, radiation-free examination with 88% sensitivity and 95% specificity for >50% stenosis 1
  • Localizes vascular lesions and quantifies severity through velocity criteria 1
  • Distinguishes atherosclerotic from non-atherosclerotic lesions 1
  • Caveat: Reliability depends heavily on sonographer expertise 1

Segmental pressure measurements:

  • Useful when anatomic localization is required for treatment planning 1
  • Helps determine level of arterial obstruction 1

Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2):

  • Indicated for evaluating tissue viability in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) 1
  • Resting TcPO2 >30 mmHg predicts favorable wound healing 1
  • Resting TcPO2 <10 mmHg associated with poor prognosis for healing and amputation 1
  • Caveat: Values affected by skin thickness, probe temperature, inflammation, and edema 1

Advanced Imaging for Revascularization Planning

Cross-sectional imaging is advisable when revascularization is being considered 1:

  • ECG-triggered cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT) for comprehensive aortic and lower extremity assessment 1
  • Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) when chronic follow-up is required to minimize radiation exposure 1
  • These modalities provide detailed anatomic information beyond what DUS can offer 1

Laboratory Evaluation

Comprehensive cardiovascular risk factor assessment is recommended 1:

  • Lipid panel (for statin therapy guidance)
  • Hemoglobin A1c (in diabetic patients)
  • Renal function (affects contrast imaging decisions and medication choices)
  • Complete blood count

Special Populations

Diabetic patients:

  • ABI accuracy is lower due to arterial calcification 1
  • TBI should be obtained if ABI >1.40 1
  • Annual screening recommended once diabetes is diagnosed 1
  • Assess for neuropathy, which compounds amputation risk 7-15 fold 2

Patients with critical limb-threatening ischemia:

  • Expedited evaluation required 1, 4
  • Use WIfI (Wound, Ischemia, foot Infection) classification to stratify amputation risk 1
  • Early referral to vascular team essential for limb salvage 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on symptoms: Only 11% of PAD patients have classic claudication 3
  • Do not accept ABI >1.40 as normal: This indicates non-compressible vessels requiring TBI 1
  • Do not use post-exercise ABI drop >20% alone: High false-positive rate in healthy populations 1
  • Do not delay imaging in CLTI: These patients require urgent vascular team evaluation 4
  • Do not forget bilateral measurements: ABI should be measured in both legs to establish baseline 1

Screening Recommendations

The 2024 ESC Guidelines recommend ABI screening for 1:

  • All men aged ≥65 years with smoking history (Class I, Level A)
  • First-degree relatives of AAA patients aged ≥50 years (Class I, Level C)

The 2024 ACC/AHA Guidelines recommend screening for 1:

  • Patients aged ≥65 years
  • Patients aged 50-64 years with diabetes or smoking history
  • Patients with exertional leg symptoms or nonhealing wounds

The American Diabetes Association recommends ABI screening for diabetic patients >50 years 5, though the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend population-based screening due to lack of evidence that screening reduces cardiovascular events 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Relationship Between PVD and PAD in Patients with Risk Factors

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Suspected Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease.

American family physician, 2013

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.