What is the first line antiarrhythmic (arrhythmia) drug?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

First-Line Antiarrhythmic Drug Selection

The first-line antiarrhythmic drug depends critically on the specific arrhythmia type and underlying cardiac pathology, but adenosine is the first-line agent for acute supraventricular tachycardia, while beta-blockers represent the safest and most evidence-based first-line choice for most chronic arrhythmia management, particularly in patients with structural heart disease. 1, 2

Acute Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)

For acute SVT termination, adenosine is the definitive first-line drug after vagal maneuvers fail. 1, 2

  • Dosing: 6 mg rapid IV bolus with saline flush; if ineffective after 1-2 minutes, give 12 mg (may repeat once). 2
  • Adenosine works specifically for AV nodal re-entrant tachyarrhythmias with a very short half-life, making it unlikely to reach fetal circulation in pregnancy. 1
  • Critical caveat: Must be administered in a monitored environment as it causes transient complete heart block; contraindicated in asthmatics due to bronchospasm risk. 2

Second-line options if adenosine fails include:

  • Beta-blockers (metoprolol or propranolol IV) are reasonable alternatives, particularly in pregnancy where they have extensive safety data. 1
  • Verapamil (5-10 mg IV over 60 seconds) may be used but carries higher hypotension risk than adenosine and is absolutely contraindicated if beta-blockers have been given or in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. 2

Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)

For stable VT with pulse, lidocaine (lignocaine) is the first-choice antiarrhythmic. 2

  • Dosing: 50 mg IV over 2 minutes, repeated every 5 minutes to total 200 mg, followed by maintenance infusion at 2 mg/min. 2
  • Alternative dosing: 1-3 mg/kg IV bolus (not exceeding 100 mg), then 2-4 mg/min infusion. 2

For refractory or recurrent VT (VT storm):

  • Amiodarone becomes first-line: 150 mg IV over 10 minutes, then 1.0 mg/min for 6 hours, then 0.5 mg/min maintenance. 2, 3
  • Beta-blockers IV are the single most effective therapy for polymorphic VT storm. 3

Critical distinction: For unstable VT with pulse, immediate synchronized cardioversion (100J, 200J, 360J) takes precedence over pharmacotherapy. 2

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) - Rhythm Control

Safety considerations dictate first-line selection more than efficacy, as most antiarrhythmics have similar effectiveness. 1

In Structurally Normal Hearts (No CAD, No Heart Failure, No LVH):

Flecainide or propafenone are first-line agents for maintaining sinus rhythm. 1, 4

  • These class IC agents have the lowest proarrhythmic risk and organ toxicity in normal hearts. 5
  • Absolute contraindication: Never use in ischemic heart disease or heart failure due to life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia risk. 1
  • Require pre-treatment with beta-blocker, verapamil, or diltiazem to prevent high ventricular rates from AF converting to 1:1 atrial flutter. 1

In Coronary Artery Disease:

Sotalol is preferred as first-line due to substantial beta-blocking activity and less long-term toxicity than amiodarone. 1

  • Beta-blockers alone may be considered first but lack convincing efficacy data for maintaining sinus rhythm post-cardioversion. 1
  • Amiodarone is reserved for second-line or when heart failure coexists. 1

In Heart Failure:

Amiodarone or dofetilide are the only safe first-line options. 1, 4

  • These are the only agents proven safe in randomized trials of heart failure patients. 1
  • Dronedarone is absolutely contraindicated in recently decompensated heart failure due to increased mortality. 1

In Hypertensive Heart Disease with LVH:

Propafenone or flecainide are first-line if no marked LVH and no CAD. 1

  • Avoid QT-prolonging agents (sotalol, dofetilide) due to increased torsades de pointes risk with LVH. 1
  • Amiodarone becomes first-line when marked LVH is present despite QT prolongation, as it carries very low ventricular proarrhythmia risk. 1

Chronic Prophylaxis and Mortality Reduction

Beta-blockers are the only antiarrhythmic class definitively proven to reduce sudden arrhythmic death and overall mortality. 4, 6

  • This benefit is most pronounced post-myocardial infarction and in heart failure patients. 4, 7
  • Beta-blockers should be considered first-line for maintaining sinus rhythm in AF patients with MI, heart failure, or hypertension. 7
  • Metoprolol CR/XL has specific evidence for maintaining sinus rhythm after AF cardioversion. 7

Critical Safety Principles

The overarching principle: Safety trumps efficacy in antiarrhythmic selection. 1

  • Most antiarrhythmic drugs have similar modest efficacy (approximately doubling sinus rhythm maintenance vs. no therapy). 1
  • Quinidine and disopyramide are associated with increased all-cause mortality and should be avoided as first-line agents. 1
  • Class I drugs (except in structurally normal hearts) and class III drugs carry significant proarrhythmic risk that often outweighs benefits. 4, 5
  • Amiodarone, while highly effective, causes frequent extracardiac toxicity (thyroid, pulmonary, hepatic) and is relegated to second-line therapy except in heart failure. 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Cardiac Arrhythmia Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Ventricular Tachycardia Storm

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2004

Research

Drug choices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

The American journal of cardiology, 2000

Research

Use of beta-blockers in atrial fibrillation.

American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2002

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.